Now the daughters of Zelophehad son of Hepher
Zelophehad is introduced as a descendant of Hepher, indicating his lineage within the tribe of Manasseh. This genealogy is significant as it establishes the daughters' rightful claim to their father's inheritance. In the patriarchal society of ancient Israel, lineage and inheritance were typically passed through male descendants, making the mention of daughters noteworthy. This sets the stage for a legal and cultural shift regarding inheritance rights.

the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh
This lineage traces back to Manasseh, one of Joseph's sons, who was born in Egypt. Manasseh was one of the two tribes that descended from Joseph, the other being Ephraim. The mention of Gilead and Machir highlights the family's connection to the land east of the Jordan River, which was allocated to the half-tribe of Manasseh. This geographical context is important as it underscores the daughters' claim to land that was part of their ancestral heritage.

belonged to the clans of Manasseh son of Joseph
The reference to the clans of Manasseh son of Joseph emphasizes the tribal structure of Israelite society. Each tribe was divided into clans, which were further divided into families. This structure was crucial for maintaining order and distributing land among the Israelites. The daughters' association with the clan of Manasseh underscores their legitimate place within the tribal system and their right to seek an inheritance.

These were the names of his daughters: Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah
The naming of Zelophehad's daughters is significant as it personalizes their story and highlights their individual identities. In biblical narratives, the naming of women is often associated with important events or roles they play. The inclusion of their names in the text underscores the importance of their legal case and the precedent it sets for future generations. Each name carries its own meaning and cultural significance, reflecting the values and hopes of their family.

They approached
The act of approaching indicates a bold and proactive step taken by the daughters. In the cultural context of ancient Israel, women typically did not have the same legal standing as men, especially in matters of inheritance. Their approach to the leaders of Israel demonstrates courage and a desire for justice. This action sets a precedent for addressing legal and social issues within the community, highlighting the importance of advocacy and the pursuit of equity.

the entrance to the Tent of Meeting
The Tent of Meeting, also known as the Tabernacle, was the central place of worship and the dwelling place of God's presence among the Israelites during their wilderness journey. It was a portable sanctuary that accompanied the Israelites and was the focal point for divine communication. The entrance to the Tent of Meeting was a significant location where important matters were addressed, symbolizing access to God and His guidance. This setting underscores the gravity of the situation and the reverence with which the petitioners approached their request.

stood before Moses
Moses was the leader and prophet of Israel, chosen by God to deliver His people from Egypt and guide them through the wilderness. Standing before Moses indicates a formal presentation of a case or request, acknowledging his authority and role as mediator between God and the people. This act of standing before Moses reflects the established order and respect for leadership within the Israelite community.

Eleazar the priest
Eleazar, the son of Aaron, served as the high priest after Aaron's death. The presence of Eleazar signifies the religious and ceremonial aspects of the issue at hand, as priests were responsible for maintaining the spiritual well-being of the nation and ensuring adherence to God's laws. His involvement highlights the importance of priestly oversight in matters of inheritance and legal decisions.

the leaders
The leaders, or elders, of Israel were representatives of the various tribes and clans, responsible for governance and decision-making within the community. Their inclusion in this assembly indicates that the matter being addressed had implications for the broader social and legal structure of Israel. It reflects the communal nature of decision-making and the importance of consensus among the leaders.

and the whole congregation
The involvement of the whole congregation emphasizes the public and communal nature of the proceedings. It suggests that the issue at hand was not only a private concern but one that affected the entire community. This phrase underscores the transparency and inclusivity of the decision-making process in Israelite society, where significant matters were addressed openly before the people.

and said
The act of speaking in this context implies a formal petition or request being made. It indicates that the individuals involved had a specific concern or issue they wished to bring before the leadership for resolution. This phrase sets the stage for the subsequent dialogue and decision-making process, highlighting the importance of communication and advocacy within the community.

Our father died in the wilderness
This phrase refers to the period of Israel's 40-year journey in the wilderness after their exodus from Egypt. The wilderness journey was a time of testing and judgment for the Israelites, as they wandered due to their disobedience and lack of faith in God's promise to enter the Promised Land (Numbers 14:33-34). The wilderness symbolizes a place of trial and purification, where the older generation of Israelites died because of their unbelief, as seen in Hebrews 3:17-19.

but he was not among the followers of Korah who gathered together against the LORD
This distinguishes the father of Zelophehad's daughters from those who participated in Korah's rebellion. Korah, along with Dathan and Abiram, led a revolt against Moses and Aaron, challenging their leadership and, by extension, God's authority (Numbers 16:1-3). The rebellion resulted in a dramatic judgment where the earth swallowed the rebels (Numbers 16:31-33). This distinction emphasizes that Zelophehad's death was not due to rebellion against God, which is significant in maintaining the integrity of his lineage.

Instead, he died because of his own sin
This acknowledges the personal responsibility for sin, a recurring theme in Scripture. While the specific sin of Zelophehad is not detailed, it reflects the broader reality that all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23). The acknowledgment of personal sin is crucial in the biblical narrative, as it underscores the need for atonement and redemption, ultimately fulfilled in Jesus Christ.

and he had no sons
In the cultural and historical context of ancient Israel, inheritance and family lineage were typically passed through male descendants. The absence of sons in Zelophehad's family presented a legal and social challenge regarding inheritance rights. This situation led to the daughters of Zelophehad appealing to Moses for the right to inherit their father's land, which resulted in a significant legal precedent in Israelite law (Numbers 27:7-11). This case highlights the importance of justice and equity in God's law and foreshadows the inclusive nature of God's kingdom, where all, regardless of gender, are heirs through faith in Christ (Galatians 3:28-29).

Why should the name of our father disappear from his clan because he had no sons?
In ancient Israelite culture, lineage and inheritance were typically passed through male descendants. The concern here reflects the importance of preserving a family's name and inheritance within the tribal structure. The daughters of Zelophehad, who speak these words, challenge the existing norms by advocating for their father's legacy despite the absence of male heirs. This request highlights the significance of family names in maintaining tribal identity and property rights. The cultural context underscores the patriarchal nature of society, where inheritance laws favored sons, yet this passage begins to address gender equity in inheritance rights. This plea also foreshadows later biblical themes of justice and fairness, as seen in Galatians 3:28, which speaks to the equality of all in Christ.

Give us property among our father’s brothers.”
The daughters' request for property among their father's brothers is a direct appeal for inclusion in the inheritance rights typically reserved for male relatives. This request is significant as it sets a precedent for inheritance laws in Israel, leading to a divine ruling that would allow daughters to inherit if there were no sons, as seen in Numbers 27:7. This change in law reflects God's justice and care for all members of the community, ensuring that the vulnerable are protected. Theologically, this can be seen as a type of Christ's inclusive kingdom, where all believers, regardless of gender or status, are co-heirs with Christ (Romans 8:17). The request also emphasizes the importance of land in Israelite society, as land was not only a source of sustenance but also a symbol of God's promise and blessing to His people.

So Moses brought their case before the LORD,
Moses, as the leader and mediator of Israel, often brought difficult cases to God for guidance. This reflects his role as a prophet and intercessor, similar to how Jesus intercedes for believers (Hebrews 7:25). The context here involves the daughters of Zelophehad, who approached Moses with a legal issue regarding inheritance rights, highlighting the importance of justice and fairness in God's law. This act of bringing the case before the LORD underscores the theocratic nature of Israel's governance, where divine guidance was sought in legal matters. It also illustrates the principle of seeking God's wisdom in decision-making, a theme echoed in James 1:5, which encourages believers to ask God for wisdom. Moses' action demonstrates humility and reliance on God, setting a precedent for leaders to seek divine counsel. This moment foreshadows the ultimate fulfillment of God's law and justice in Christ, who perfectly embodies wisdom and truth. and the LORD answered him,
This phrase highlights the direct communication between God and Moses, a recurring theme in the Pentateuch. It underscores the unique relationship Moses had with God, as seen in Exodus 33:11, where it is stated that the LORD spoke to Moses face to face, as a man speaks to his friend. This divine response also emphasizes God's willingness to provide guidance and clarity in matters of law and justice, reflecting His role as the ultimate lawgiver. The context of this passage involves the daughters of Zelophehad, who approached Moses with a legal question about inheritance rights, showcasing the progressive nature of God's laws in addressing issues of justice and equity. This moment foreshadows the New Testament principle found in James 1:5, where believers are encouraged to seek wisdom from God, who gives generously to all without finding fault. The daughters of Zelophehad speak correctly.
This phrase acknowledges the validity of the daughters' claim, which was a significant moment in biblical history. In the patriarchal society of ancient Israel, inheritance typically passed through male descendants. The daughters of Zelophehad—Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah—challenged this norm by approaching Moses and the leaders to request their father's inheritance, as he had no sons. This event is a pivotal moment in the biblical narrative, highlighting God's justice and the importance of women's rights within the community. It also sets a precedent for future inheritance laws in Israel, as seen in Numbers 36 and Joshua 17.

You certainly must give them property as an inheritance among their father’s brothers
This command from God through Moses ensures that the daughters receive a portion of land among their father's brothers, thus preserving their father's name and property within the tribe of Manasseh. This decision reflects the broader biblical principle of justice and fairness, as seen in Deuteronomy 10:18, where God is described as one who "defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow." The allocation of land is crucial in the context of the Promised Land, as it represents not only economic stability but also a tangible connection to God's covenant promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

and transfer their father’s inheritance to them.
The transfer of inheritance to the daughters signifies a shift in the legal and cultural practices of the time, allowing for the preservation of family lineage and property rights even in the absence of male heirs. This decision is later codified into Israelite law, as seen in Numbers 36, where additional regulations are provided to ensure that such inheritances remain within the tribe. This provision also foreshadows the inclusive nature of God's kingdom, where all believers, regardless of gender or social status, are heirs to the promises of God, as articulated in Galatians 3:28-29. The daughters of Zelophehad can be seen as types of Christ in their role as advocates for justice and righteousness, prefiguring Christ's advocacy for humanity before God.

Furthermore, you shall say to the Israelites
This phrase indicates a direct command from God to Moses, emphasizing the importance of the message. The Israelites, as God's chosen people, are being given specific instructions to ensure justice and fairness within their community. This command is part of the broader legal and moral code given to the Israelites during their wilderness journey, reflecting God's concern for order and equity among His people.

If a man dies and leaves no son
In ancient Israelite society, inheritance typically passed through the male line, as sons were expected to carry on the family name and manage the family estate. The absence of a son would have posed a significant issue, potentially leading to the loss of family property and name. This situation highlights the patriarchal structure of the society, where lineage and property rights were closely tied to male heirs.

you are to transfer his inheritance to his daughter
This provision marks a significant development in the inheritance laws of ancient Israel, ensuring that a man's lineage and property could continue through his daughter if he had no sons. It reflects a measure of protection for women in a patriarchal society, acknowledging their role in preserving family heritage. This law also foreshadows the New Testament's emphasis on the equal value of all individuals before God, as seen in Galatians 3:28, where Paul states that in Christ, there is neither male nor female. This provision can be seen as a type of Christ's inclusive kingdom, where all believers are heirs to God's promises, regardless of gender.

If he has no daughter
In the context of ancient Israelite society, inheritance laws were crucial for maintaining family lineage and property within the tribe. The absence of a daughter in this scenario highlights the patriarchal structure of the society, where male heirs were typically prioritized. This reflects the broader cultural norms of the ancient Near East, where lineage and inheritance were often passed through male descendants. The mention of a daughter here is significant because it follows the case of Zelophehad's daughters (Numbers 27:1-8), who successfully petitioned for the right to inherit their father's property, setting a precedent for female inheritance rights in specific circumstances.

give his inheritance to his brothers
This directive ensures that the inheritance remains within the immediate family, preserving the tribal allotment as originally distributed among the Israelites. The brothers of the deceased would be the next closest male relatives, maintaining the property within the same paternal line. This practice underscores the importance of family and tribal continuity in Israelite culture. It also reflects the broader biblical theme of family responsibility and care, as seen in other passages such as Ruth 4:1-10, where Boaz acts as a kinsman-redeemer to preserve the family line of Elimelech. This principle of keeping inheritance within the family can be seen as a type of Christ, who as our kinsman-redeemer, restores and preserves our spiritual inheritance.

If he has no brothers
In the context of ancient Israelite society, inheritance laws were crucial for maintaining family lineage and property within the tribe. The absence of brothers meant that the direct male line of inheritance was broken. This reflects the patriarchal structure of the society, where male heirs were typically responsible for carrying on the family name and managing the family estate. The situation described here arises from the case of Zelophehad's daughters, who brought their petition to Moses because their father died without sons (Numbers 27:1-4). This highlights the flexibility within the law to adapt to specific family circumstances, ensuring that property remained within the tribe.

give his inheritance to his father’s brothers
This provision ensures that the inheritance remains within the extended family, preserving the tribal allotment as originally distributed among the Israelites. The father's brothers, or uncles of the deceased, would be the next closest male relatives, maintaining the property within the paternal line. This reflects the importance of family and tribal continuity in Israelite culture. The law here anticipates situations where there are no direct male descendants, providing a clear line of succession. This principle of keeping inheritance within the family is echoed in other parts of Scripture, such as the story of Ruth and Boaz, where the kinsman-redeemer plays a role in preserving family lineage (Ruth 4:1-10). This also foreshadows the New Testament concept of spiritual inheritance, where believers are considered co-heirs with Christ (Romans 8:17), emphasizing the importance of familial and spiritual continuity.

And if his father has no brothers,
This phrase addresses the situation where a man dies without leaving a male heir, and his father also has no brothers to inherit the property. In ancient Israelite society, inheritance was typically passed through the male line, reflecting the patriarchal structure of the culture. This provision ensures that the inheritance remains within the extended family, preserving the tribal and familial land allocations established when the Israelites entered the Promised Land.

give his inheritance to the next of kin from his clan,
The next of kin, or closest relative, would be responsible for taking possession of the inheritance. This reflects the importance of family and clan in maintaining the social and economic stability of the community. The concept of the "kinsman-redeemer" is seen here, which is further illustrated in the Book of Ruth, where Boaz acts as a redeemer for Naomi and Ruth. This principle underscores the value placed on family loyalty and the preservation of family lineage.

that he may take possession of it.
The taking of possession by the next of kin ensures that the land remains within the tribe, which was crucial for maintaining the tribal boundaries and identity. This also prevented the fragmentation of land holdings, which could weaken the economic base of a family or clan. The possession of land was not just an economic matter but also a spiritual one, as the land was seen as a gift from God to the Israelites.

This is to be a statutory ordinance for the Israelites,
The term "statutory ordinance" indicates that this command is not merely a suggestion but a binding legal requirement for the Israelite community. It reflects the divine authority behind the laws given to Moses and underscores the importance of obedience to God's commands. This ordinance is part of the broader legal framework that governed Israelite society, emphasizing justice, fairness, and the protection of family rights.

as the LORD has commanded Moses.’”
This phrase affirms the divine origin of the command, highlighting Moses as the mediator of God's law to the people. It reinforces the authority of the law by attributing it directly to the LORD, the covenant God of Israel. This divine commandment is part of the larger narrative of God's covenant relationship with Israel, where obedience to God's laws is a central theme. Moses, as a type of Christ, serves as a mediator between God and His people, foreshadowing the ultimate mediation of Jesus Christ in the New Testament.

Then the LORD said to Moses
This phrase indicates a direct communication from God to Moses, a common occurrence in the Pentateuch. Moses is often seen as a mediator between God and the Israelites, highlighting his unique role as a prophet and leader. This divine instruction underscores the intimate relationship Moses had with God, as seen in Exodus 33:11, where it is said that the LORD spoke to Moses face to face.

Go up this mountain of the Abarim range
The Abarim range is a series of mountains east of the Jordan River, opposite Jericho. This geographical location is significant as it provides a vantage point to view the Promised Land. The Abarim range includes Mount Nebo, where Moses would later die (Deuteronomy 34:1-5). The command to ascend the mountain symbolizes a transition in leadership and the nearing fulfillment of God's promise to Abraham regarding the land (Genesis 12:7).

and see the land
Moses is instructed to view the land, which he will not enter due to his disobedience at Meribah (Numbers 20:12). This act of seeing represents both a fulfillment and a limitation of the promise. It serves as a poignant moment of closure for Moses, who led the Israelites out of Egypt and through the wilderness. Theologically, it reflects the idea of faith and hope, seeing the promise from afar, as echoed in Hebrews 11:13.

that I have given the Israelites
This phrase emphasizes God's sovereignty and faithfulness in fulfilling His covenant promises. The land is described as a divine gift, reinforcing the concept of the Promised Land as an inheritance for the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. This promise is central to the narrative of the Israelites and is a recurring theme throughout the Old Testament, pointing to God's unchanging nature and His plan for His people.

After you have seen it
This phrase refers to Moses being allowed to view the Promised Land from Mount Nebo before his death. This moment is significant as it fulfills God's promise to show Moses the land, even though he would not enter it due to his disobedience at Meribah (Numbers 20:12). The act of seeing the land symbolizes the culmination of Moses' leadership and the journey of the Israelites from Egypt. It also serves as a reminder of God's faithfulness in fulfilling His promises, despite human shortcomings.

you too will be gathered to your people
The phrase "gathered to your people" is a common biblical expression for death, indicating a reunion with ancestors in the afterlife. This reflects the belief in an existence beyond death and a continuity of the covenant community. It underscores the idea of a spiritual heritage and the hope of being united with those who have gone before. This concept is seen throughout the Old Testament, such as in Genesis 25:8 regarding Abraham and Genesis 49:33 concerning Jacob.

as your brother Aaron was
Aaron's death is recorded in Numbers 20:22-29, where he ascends Mount Hor and dies there, passing his priestly garments to his son Eleazar. This parallel between Moses and Aaron highlights the end of an era of leadership for the Israelites. Both brothers played crucial roles in leading the people out of Egypt and through the wilderness. Their deaths signify a transition in leadership to the next generation, specifically to Joshua, who will lead the Israelites into the Promised Land. This transition also points to the continuity of God's plan and the importance of faithful leadership.

for when the congregation contended in the Wilderness of Zin,
The Wilderness of Zin is a desert region located in the northeastern part of the Sinai Peninsula. It is significant in the Israelites' journey from Egypt to the Promised Land. The congregation's contention here reflects a recurring theme of Israel's complaints and lack of faith during their wilderness wanderings. This incident is part of a broader narrative of testing and rebellion against God, which is a central theme in the Pentateuch.

both of you rebelled against My command
This phrase refers to Moses and Aaron, who were leaders of the Israelites. Their rebellion is detailed in Numbers 20:7-12, where God instructed Moses to speak to the rock to bring forth water, but instead, Moses struck the rock twice with his staff. This act of disobedience is seen as a failure to uphold God's holiness and a lack of trust in His provision. It highlights the importance of obedience to God's commands, especially for those in leadership.

to show My holiness in their sight regarding the waters.”
God's holiness is a central theme throughout the Bible, emphasizing His separateness, purity, and divine nature. In this context, Moses and Aaron's failure to follow God's instructions prevented the demonstration of His holiness to the Israelites. The incident underscores the importance of leaders reflecting God's character and the consequences of failing to do so.

Those were the waters of Meribah in Kadesh,
Meribah, meaning "quarreling" or "strife," is a location associated with the Israelites' complaints and God's provision of water. Kadesh is a significant site in the wilderness journey, serving as a base for the Israelites. The naming of Meribah serves as a reminder of the people's contentious nature and the testing of God's patience.

in the Wilderness of Zin.
The repetition of the location emphasizes the geographical and historical context of the event. The Wilderness of Zin is a harsh, arid environment, which contributed to the Israelites' struggles and complaints. This setting serves as a backdrop for God's miraculous provision and the testing of faith. The wilderness experience is often seen as a metaphor for spiritual testing and growth in the Christian life.

So Moses appealed to the LORD
Moses, as the leader of the Israelites, consistently sought guidance from God, demonstrating his role as a mediator between God and His people. This appeal signifies Moses' recognition of God's ultimate authority and wisdom. In the context of Numbers 27, Moses is aware of his impending death and the need for a successor to lead the Israelites into the Promised Land. This reflects the biblical principle of seeking divine guidance in leadership transitions, as seen in other instances such as the anointing of David by Samuel (1 Samuel 16:12-13).

The act of appealing to the LORD underscores the importance of prayer and intercession in the life of a believer. Moses' relationship with God was characterized by direct communication, as evidenced by their encounters on Mount Sinai (Exodus 19-20). This phrase also highlights the humility of Moses, who, despite his leadership position, acknowledges his dependence on God for direction and decision-making.

In a broader biblical context, Moses' appeal can be seen as a type of Christ, who is the ultimate mediator between God and humanity (1 Timothy 2:5). Just as Moses interceded for the Israelites, Jesus intercedes for believers, providing a way to approach God with confidence (Hebrews 4:14-16).

Culturally, the role of a leader in ancient Israel was not only political but also spiritual. Moses' appeal to God reflects the theocratic nature of Israelite society, where God was recognized as the true King and leader. This theocratic principle is echoed throughout the Old Testament, where leaders like Joshua, David, and Solomon sought God's guidance in their reigns.

Geographically, the Israelites were on the brink of entering Canaan, the land promised to their ancestors. Moses' appeal is set against this backdrop of transition and anticipation, emphasizing the need for divine guidance as they prepared to settle in a new land. This moment is pivotal in Israel's history, marking the end of their wilderness journey and the beginning of a new chapter in the Promised Land. May the LORD
This phrase acknowledges the sovereignty and authority of God. In the context of Numbers, Moses is speaking to God, recognizing Him as the ultimate source of guidance and leadership. This reflects the consistent biblical theme that God is the one who appoints leaders (Romans 13:1). The invocation of the LORD here is a plea for divine intervention and wisdom, emphasizing the need for God's direction in the leadership of His people.

the God of the spirits of all flesh
This phrase highlights God's omniscience and omnipotence. It acknowledges that God is the creator and sustainer of all life, possessing intimate knowledge of every individual (Psalm 139:13-16). The term "spirits of all flesh" suggests that God understands the inner workings and needs of every person, making Him uniquely qualified to appoint a leader who can shepherd His people effectively. This also underscores the belief that human life is sacred and under God's dominion.

appoint a man over the congregation
Here, Moses requests that God choose a successor to lead the Israelites. This reflects the biblical principle of divinely appointed leadership, as seen in the anointing of kings and prophets throughout Scripture (1 Samuel 16:1-13). The need for a leader "over the congregation" indicates the importance of guidance and order within the community of God's people. This request foreshadows the role of Jesus Christ as the ultimate shepherd and leader of God's people (John 10:11-16), fulfilling the need for a divinely appointed leader who guides with wisdom and compassion.

who will go out and come in before them
This phrase refers to the leadership role that involves guiding and directing the people in their daily activities and military endeavors. In ancient Israel, a leader was expected to be actively involved in the life of the community, both in times of peace and war. The expression "go out and come in" is a Hebrew idiom for leading in battle and managing the affairs of the people (1 Samuel 18:13, 2 Samuel 5:2). It emphasizes the need for a leader who is present and engaged with the people, ensuring their safety and well-being.

and who will lead them out and bring them in
This part of the verse highlights the need for a leader who can guide the people effectively, ensuring their safe passage and return. It underscores the importance of a leader who can provide direction and protection, much like a shepherd with his flock. This imagery is consistent with the role of a king or military leader in ancient Israel, who was responsible for the security and prosperity of the nation. The phrase also foreshadows the role of Jesus Christ as the Good Shepherd (John 10:3-4), who leads His followers with care and authority.

so that the congregation of the LORD
The term "congregation of the LORD" refers to the assembly of the Israelites, God's chosen people. This phrase emphasizes the covenant relationship between God and Israel, where the people are seen as a community under divine guidance and protection. The congregation is not just a social or political entity but a spiritual one, called to live according to God's laws and purposes. This concept is foundational in understanding the identity and mission of Israel as a nation set apart for God's glory (Exodus 19:5-6).

will not be like sheep without a shepherd.
This simile draws on the pastoral imagery common in the ancient Near East, where sheep without a shepherd are vulnerable to danger and easily scattered. It underscores the necessity of strong, godly leadership to provide guidance, protection, and care for the people. The imagery of sheep and shepherd is prevalent throughout Scripture, symbolizing the relationship between God and His people (Psalm 23, Ezekiel 34:5-6). In the New Testament, Jesus is portrayed as the ultimate Shepherd who lays down His life for the sheep (John 10:11), fulfilling the prophetic and pastoral role anticipated in the Old Testament.

And the LORD replied to Moses
This phrase indicates direct communication from God to Moses, a common occurrence in the Pentateuch. Moses, as the leader of Israel, often received divine instructions. This communication underscores the theocratic nature of Israel's leadership, where God directly guides His chosen leaders. It also highlights Moses' unique role as a prophet and mediator between God and the people.

Take Joshua son of Nun
Joshua, whose name means "The LORD is salvation," is introduced as the successor to Moses. He is the son of Nun, from the tribe of Ephraim. Joshua had been Moses' assistant and had proven his faithfulness and leadership abilities, notably as one of the two spies who brought back a positive report from Canaan (Numbers 14:6-9). His selection signifies the importance of mentorship and preparation for leadership within the community of Israel.

a man with the Spirit in him
This phrase indicates that Joshua is endowed with the Spirit of God, which is essential for leadership among God's people. The presence of the Spirit signifies divine approval and empowerment, enabling Joshua to lead with wisdom and strength. This concept is echoed in the New Testament, where the Holy Spirit empowers believers for service (Acts 1:8). It also foreshadows the role of the Holy Spirit in the life of Jesus and His followers.

and lay your hands on him
The laying on of hands is a symbolic act of transferring authority and blessing. It signifies the official commissioning of Joshua as Moses' successor. This practice is seen throughout Scripture as a means of ordination and impartation of spiritual gifts (1 Timothy 4:14). It also prefigures the New Testament practice of laying on hands for healing and commissioning (Acts 6:6). This act ensures continuity of leadership and God's ongoing guidance for Israel.

Have him stand before Eleazar the priest
This phrase indicates the importance of Eleazar, the son of Aaron, who succeeded his father as the high priest. The high priest played a crucial role in Israelite society, serving as a mediator between God and the people. Standing before Eleazar signifies the divine approval and religious legitimacy of Joshua's leadership. This act also underscores the continuity of the priestly line and the importance of spiritual authority in leadership transitions. The high priest's involvement highlights the theocratic nature of Israel's governance, where religious and civil leadership were intertwined.

and the whole congregation
The inclusion of the whole congregation emphasizes the communal aspect of leadership in Israel. It was important for the people to witness the commissioning of Joshua to ensure transparency and public acknowledgment of his new role. This public ceremony would foster unity and collective acceptance of Joshua as Moses' successor. The congregation's presence also reflects the democratic elements within the theocratic system, where the community had a role in affirming leadership. This practice can be seen as a precursor to the New Testament church's communal decision-making processes, as seen in Acts 6:5.

and commission him in their sight
Commissioning Joshua in the sight of the congregation was a formal act of transferring authority. This public commissioning served as a visible sign of God's choice and Moses' endorsement of Joshua. It was essential for maintaining order and continuity as Israel prepared to enter the Promised Land. The act of commissioning is reminiscent of the laying on of hands in the New Testament, as seen in Acts 13:3, where leaders are set apart for specific tasks. This phrase also foreshadows the Great Commission given by Jesus to His disciples in Matthew 28:19-20, where authority is passed on to continue God's work.

Confer on him some of your authority
This phrase refers to the transfer of leadership from Moses to Joshua. Moses, who led the Israelites out of Egypt and through the wilderness, is instructed by God to pass on some of his authority to Joshua. This act signifies a divinely ordained succession plan, ensuring continuity in leadership. The Hebrew word for "authority" here can also mean "honor" or "majesty," indicating that Joshua is to be respected and followed as Moses was. This transfer is not just a political move but a spiritual one, as it involves God's blessing and guidance. The laying on of hands, which Moses performs later, is a symbolic act of this transfer, seen in other biblical contexts such as the ordination of priests (Leviticus 8:10) and the commissioning of leaders (Acts 6:6).

so that the whole congregation of Israel
The "whole congregation of Israel" refers to the entire community of Israelites, including all twelve tribes. This phrase emphasizes the unity and collective identity of the people as God's chosen nation. The congregation is not just a gathering of individuals but a covenant community bound by their relationship with God and their shared history. The leadership transition is crucial for maintaining this unity, as the people are on the brink of entering the Promised Land. The congregation's obedience to Joshua is essential for their success and survival, as they will face numerous challenges and battles in Canaan.

will obey him
Obedience to Joshua is a central theme in this passage. Joshua's leadership is legitimized by the authority conferred upon him by Moses, who is God's appointed servant. This obedience is not merely a matter of following orders but is deeply rooted in the Israelites' covenant relationship with God. The success of the Israelites in conquering the Promised Land is contingent upon their obedience to God's commands, as mediated through Joshua. This theme of obedience is echoed throughout the book of Joshua, where the people's adherence to God's instructions leads to victory, while disobedience results in setbacks (Joshua 7:1-5). Joshua is a type of Christ, as he leads the people into the Promised Land, just as Jesus leads believers into the spiritual rest and inheritance promised by God (Hebrews 4:8-10).

He shall stand before Eleazar the priest
This phrase indicates the transfer of leadership from Moses to Joshua, highlighting the role of Eleazar, the high priest, in this process. Eleazar, son of Aaron, represents the priestly authority and spiritual guidance necessary for the Israelites. The standing before the priest signifies respect and acknowledgment of the priestly office, which serves as a mediator between God and the people.

who will seek counsel for him before the LORD
This emphasizes the importance of divine guidance in leadership decisions. Seeking counsel before the LORD underscores the theocratic nature of Israel's governance, where decisions are made not solely based on human wisdom but through divine revelation. This practice reflects the dependence on God for direction, a theme prevalent throughout the Old Testament.

by the judgment of the Urim
The Urim, along with the Thummim, were sacred lots used by the high priest to discern God's will. Their exact nature is unknown, but they were likely stones or objects kept in the breastplate of the high priest. The use of the Urim signifies a direct and tangible method of receiving God's guidance, highlighting the seriousness and sacredness of the decision-making process.

At his command, he and all the Israelites with him
This phrase indicates the authority given to Joshua as the leader of Israel. His command is not just personal but extends to the entire nation, showing the unity and collective movement of the people under God's appointed leader. It reflects the hierarchical structure of leadership, with Joshua as the military and administrative head.

the entire congregation
The term "congregation" refers to the whole assembly of Israel, emphasizing the communal aspect of their journey and mission. It highlights the unity and collective identity of the Israelites as God's chosen people, bound together by covenant and purpose.

will go out and come in
This expression is a Hebrew idiom for conducting daily affairs, including military campaigns and community activities. It signifies the comprehensive scope of Joshua's leadership, covering all aspects of life. This phrase also implies protection and provision, as going out and coming in safely is a sign of God's blessing and presence with His people.

Moses did as the LORD had commanded him.
Moses' obedience to God's command is a recurring theme throughout the Pentateuch. This phrase highlights Moses' role as a faithful servant and leader who acts according to divine instruction. His obedience sets a precedent for Israel's leaders and reflects the importance of following God's will. This act of obedience is reminiscent of other biblical figures who followed God's commands, such as Noah building the ark (Genesis 6:22) and Abraham's willingness to sacrifice Isaac (Genesis 22:2-3).

He took Joshua,
Joshua, the son of Nun, is introduced as Moses' successor. His selection is significant as he represents a new generation of leadership for Israel. Joshua had already proven his faithfulness and capability, notably as one of the two spies who trusted in God's promise to give Israel the land of Canaan (Numbers 14:6-9). His name, meaning "The LORD is salvation," is a type of Christ, foreshadowing Jesus, whose name in Hebrew is Yeshua, the same as Joshua.

had him stand before Eleazar the priest
Eleazar, the son of Aaron, serves as the high priest, a role of spiritual leadership and mediation between God and the people. By having Joshua stand before Eleazar, the text emphasizes the importance of spiritual authority and the priestly blessing in the commissioning of leaders. This act signifies the divine approval and religious legitimacy of Joshua's leadership. The priestly role is a type of Christ, who is our high priest (Hebrews 4:14).

and the whole congregation,
The presence of the whole congregation underscores the communal aspect of leadership transition. It ensures transparency and public acknowledgment of Joshua's new role. This public commissioning is crucial for maintaining unity and continuity within the Israelite community. It reflects the biblical principle of communal witness and accountability, as seen in other instances of public declarations, such as the covenant renewal at Shechem (Joshua 24:1-28).

and laid his hands on him
The act of laying hands is a significant biblical gesture symbolizing the transfer of authority, blessing, or the Holy Spirit. In this context, Moses laying hands on Joshua signifies the transfer of leadership. This practice is seen throughout Scripture, such as in the ordination of priests (Leviticus 8:14) and the commissioning of the seven deacons in the early church (Acts 6:6). It represents a public acknowledgment of God's choice and the empowerment of the individual for a specific task.

and commissioned him
Commissioning involves appointing someone to a specific role or task. Here, Joshua is being appointed as the leader of Israel, succeeding Moses. This commissioning is not just a human decision but a divine mandate, as Joshua is to lead the Israelites into the Promised Land. The concept of commissioning is echoed in the New Testament, where Jesus commissions His disciples to spread the Gospel (Matthew 28:19-20), indicating a continuity of God's mission through chosen leaders.

as the LORD had instructed
This phrase underscores the importance of divine guidance and obedience to God's commands. Moses acts according to God's specific instructions, highlighting the theme of obedience that runs throughout the book of Numbers. It reflects the biblical principle that leadership and authority come from God and must align with His will. This obedience is crucial for the success of Joshua's leadership and the fulfillment of God's promises to Israel.

through Moses
Moses serves as the intermediary between God and the people of Israel, a role that foreshadows the mediatory work of Jesus Christ. Just as Moses faithfully conveys God's instructions to the people, Jesus is the ultimate mediator between God and humanity (1 Timothy 2:5). This phrase also emphasizes the continuity of God's plan, as the leadership transition from Moses to Joshua is part of the divine strategy to bring Israel into the Promised Land. Moses' role as a prophet and leader is foundational, and his actions set a precedent for future leaders in Israel.