Topical Bible: The Jews: Punished For: Imprecating Upon Themselves the Blood of Christ

◄ The Jews: Punished For: Imprecating Upon Themselves the Blood of Christ ►

Jump to: Torrey's • Library • Subtopics • Terms

Topical Encyclopedia

In the New Testament, the Jewish people are depicted as having a significant role in the events leading to the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. One of the most poignant moments in this narrative is their acceptance of responsibility for His death, which is seen as invoking divine judgment upon themselves and their descendants. This act is often interpreted as a self-imprecation, a calling down of a curse upon oneself.

Biblical Account

The key scriptural reference for this event is found in the Gospel of Matthew. During the trial of Jesus before Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor, Pilate sought to release Jesus, finding no fault in Him. However, the crowd, stirred by the chief priests and elders, demanded His crucifixion. Pilate, in an attempt to absolve himself of responsibility, washed his hands before the crowd, declaring, "I am innocent of this man’s blood. You bear the responsibility" (Matthew 27:24). In response, the people answered, "His blood be on us and on our children!" (Matthew 27:25).

Theological Implications

From a theological perspective, this declaration is seen as a profound moment of self-condemnation. The phrase "His blood be on us and on our children" is interpreted as the Jewish people's acceptance of guilt for the death of Jesus, which, in turn, is believed to have brought about divine punishment. This self-imprecation is viewed as a fulfillment of the covenantal curses outlined in the Hebrew Scriptures, where disobedience to God’s commands would result in severe consequences (Deuteronomy 28:15-68).

Historical Consequences

Historically, this invocation of Jesus' blood has been linked to the subsequent suffering and dispersion of the Jewish people. The destruction of Jerusalem and the Second Temple in 70 A.D. by the Romans is often cited as a direct consequence of this self-imprecation. The Jewish historian Josephus provides a detailed account of the siege and destruction, which resulted in significant loss of life and the scattering of the Jewish population.

Interpretations and Controversies

This passage has been the subject of much debate and controversy throughout Christian history. It has been used, at times, to justify anti-Semitic attitudes and actions, which is a misuse of the text. It is crucial to approach this scripture with an understanding of its historical and theological context, recognizing the broader narrative of redemption and the New Testament's emphasis on the offer of salvation to all people, including the Jewish people.

New Testament Context

The New Testament consistently portrays Jesus' crucifixion as part of God's redemptive plan for humanity. The Apostle Paul, himself a Jew, emphasizes that the gospel is "the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, first to the Jew, then to the Greek" (Romans 1:16). This underscores the inclusive nature of the Christian message and the hope of reconciliation for all.

Conclusion

While the self-imprecation of the Jewish people in Matthew 27:25 is a significant moment in the Passion narrative, it must be understood within the broader context of God's redemptive purposes. The New Testament offers a message of hope and reconciliation, affirming that through Christ, all people, regardless of their past actions, can find forgiveness and new life.

Torrey's Topical Textbook

Matthew 27:25
Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.
Torrey's Topical Textbook

Library

Exposition of the Moral Law.
... was not so: that they were punished for their ... of expression was common among the
Jews whenever any ... to witness our statement, without imprecating his vengeance ...
/.../calvin/the institutes of the christian religion/chapter 8 exposition of the.htm