is the advantage
The Greek word for "advantage" is "πλεονέκτημα" (pleonektēma), which implies a benefit or superiority. Paul is addressing a potential misunderstanding among his Jewish audience who might feel that their heritage and adherence to the law should grant them special status. Historically, Jews were seen as God's chosen people, which was a significant advantage in terms of receiving God's revelations and promises.

of being a Jew?
The term "Jew" here refers to the ethnic and religious identity of the Israelites, the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. In the first-century context, being a Jew meant being part of a covenant community with a unique relationship with God. This identity was deeply rooted in the history of the Old Testament, where Jews were chosen to be a light to the nations.

Or what is the value
The word "value" translates from the Greek "ὠφέλεια" (ōpheleia), meaning usefulness or benefit. Paul is questioning the practical and spiritual benefits of Jewish identity and practices, particularly in light of the new covenant established through Christ. This challenges the audience to reconsider the true essence of their faith and relationship with God.

of circumcision?
Circumcision was a physical sign of the covenant between God and Abraham, as described in Genesis 17. It was a crucial aspect of Jewish identity and religious practice. In the historical and scriptural context, circumcision represented obedience and belonging to God's chosen people. However, Paul is prompting his readers to reflect on whether the physical act alone holds any spiritual merit without a corresponding inward transformation.

(1-8) Continuing the subject, but with a long digression in Romans 3:3 et seq. The Apostle asks, What is the real value of these apparent advantages? He is about to answer the question fully, as he does later in Romans 9:4-5; but after stating the first point, he goes off upon a difficulty raised by this, and does not return to complete what he had begun. This, again, is characteristic of his ardent and keenly speculative mind. Problems such as those which he discusses evidently have a fascination for him, and lead him, here as elsewhere, at once to leave the immediate subject before him, and to enter eagerly into the discussion of them. A more lethargic or timid brain would be under no such temptation.

One real and solid advantage on the part of the Jew was that he was made the direct recipient of the divine revelation. This privilege of his is not annulled by the defection of a part of the people. It rests not upon the precarious fidelity of men, but upon the infallible promise of God. Yet is not the ultimate triumph of that promise any excuse for those who have set it at nought. They will be punished just the same, and rightly. Otherwise there could be no judgment at all. The casuistical objection that sin loses its guilt if it redounds to God's glory, or, in other words, that the end justifies the means, carries with it its own condemnation.

(1) It was not illusory; it did convey great advantages in the way of privilege and opportunity; this advantage first, not to mention other. that "the oracles of God" were entrusted to the Jew. And

(2) if some (more or fewer, it matters not) have failed to realize these advantages, it has been their fault, not God's. It is man's unfaithfulness, not his, that has been the cause of the failure. Nay, though, according to the hasty saying of the psalmist, all men were false, God's truth remains; nay, further, as is expressed in another psalm (Psalm 51.), man's very unfaithfulness is found to commend his faithfulness the more, and redound to his greater glory. Objection 2 (ver. 5). Based on the last assertion. But if man's unfaithfulness has this result, how can God, consistently with his justice, be wrath with us and punish us for it? Surely the Jew (whose case we are now considering) may claim exemption from "the wrath" of God spoken of above, his unfaithfulness being allowed to have served only to establish God's truth and to enhance his glory. Answer (ver. 6-8). I have suggested this objection as though the matter could be regarded from a mere human point of view, as though it were one between man and man; for it is true that a man cannot justly take vengeance on another who has not really harmed him. But such a view is inapplicable to God in his dealings with man; it does not touch our doctrine of his righteous wrath against sin as such. I can only meet it with a μὴ γένοιτο. For

(1) it would preclude God from judging the world at all, as we all believe he will do. Any heathen sinner might put in the same plea, saying, Why am I too (κἀγὼ) judged as a sinner? Nay, . . .

Parallel Commentaries ...