King Solomon, however, loved many foreign women
This phrase highlights a significant turning point in Solomon's reign. Despite his wisdom and the blessings bestowed upon him, Solomon's love for foreign women led him astray. This love was not merely romantic but also political, as marriages were often used to form alliances. However, these alliances came at a spiritual cost, as they introduced foreign influences and idolatry into Israel. This disobedience to God's command in Deuteronomy 7:3-4, which warned against intermarrying with foreign nations to prevent turning away from God, foreshadows the division and downfall of the kingdom.

along with the daughter of Pharaoh
Solomon's marriage to Pharaoh's daughter was a strategic alliance, symbolizing peace and cooperation between Israel and Egypt. This union is significant as it represents the first recorded marriage between an Israelite king and an Egyptian princess, indicating Solomon's political acumen. However, it also marks the beginning of his spiritual decline, as it involved adopting foreign customs and religious practices, contrary to God's instructions in Exodus 34:16.

women of Moab, Ammon, Edom, and Sidon
These nations were historically hostile to Israel, and their inclusion here underscores the extent of Solomon's alliances. Moab and Ammon were descendants of Lot (Genesis 19:37-38), and their worship of Chemosh and Molech involved detestable practices. Edom, descended from Esau, had a long-standing enmity with Israel. Sidon, a Phoenician city, was known for its worship of Baal and Ashtoreth. Solomon's marriages to women from these nations introduced their idolatrous practices into Israel, directly violating God's covenant and leading to spiritual corruption.

as well as Hittite women
The Hittites were a powerful group in the ancient Near East, known for their advanced culture and military prowess. By marrying Hittite women, Solomon further expanded his political network. However, this also meant embracing their religious practices, which were incompatible with the worship of Yahweh. This phrase emphasizes the breadth of Solomon's alliances and the resulting spiritual compromise, which ultimately led to the kingdom's division after his death, as prophesied in 1 Kings 11:11-13. Solomon's actions serve as a cautionary tale about the dangers of compromising faith for political or personal gain.

These women were from the nations about which the LORD had told the Israelites
The nations referred to here are the surrounding peoples such as the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians, and Hittites. These groups were known for their idolatrous practices and were often in conflict with Israel. The LORD's command to the Israelites to avoid intermarriage with these nations is rooted in the concern for spiritual purity and the prevention of idolatry. This directive is found in Deuteronomy 7:3-4, where God warns against forming alliances that could lead to the worship of foreign gods.

“You must not intermarry with them, for surely they will turn your hearts after their gods.”
The prohibition against intermarriage is not based on ethnic or racial grounds but on religious and spiritual concerns. The primary issue is the potential for these marriages to lead the Israelites away from worshiping the one true God. Historical context shows that intermarriage often led to the introduction of foreign religious practices, which could corrupt the faith of the Israelites. This warning is prophetic, as seen in the eventual downfall of Solomon, whose heart was indeed turned away from God due to his foreign wives, fulfilling the very warning given by God.

Yet Solomon clung to these women in love.
Solomon's attachment to these women highlights a personal failure to adhere to God's commands. Despite his wisdom, Solomon's love for his foreign wives led him to compromise his faith. This phrase underscores the tension between human desires and divine commandments. Solomon's actions serve as a cautionary tale about the dangers of allowing personal affections to override spiritual convictions. His clinging to these women symbolizes a deeper spiritual infidelity, as his heart was divided between his love for God and his love for his wives. Solomon's failure foreshadows the eventual division of the kingdom and serves as a type of Christ in reverse, contrasting with Jesus' perfect obedience to the Father.

He had seven hundred wives of royal birth
Solomon's marriages to women of royal birth were often political alliances, common in the ancient Near East to secure peace and strengthen political ties. These marriages were likely intended to establish alliances with surrounding nations, such as Egypt and Moab. This practice, while politically advantageous, was contrary to Deuteronomy 17:17, which warned Israelite kings against taking many wives, as it could lead their hearts astray. Solomon's actions reflect a departure from the covenantal ideals set for Israel's leaders.

and three hundred concubines
Concubines in ancient Israel were women who had a recognized relationship with a man but without the full status of a wife. They often bore children and were part of the household. The large number of concubines indicates Solomon's immense wealth and power, as maintaining such a household required significant resources. This practice, however, also reflects a deviation from the monogamous ideal seen in Genesis 2:24 and highlights the potential for moral and spiritual compromise.

and his wives turned his heart away
This phrase underscores the spiritual danger of Solomon's marriages. Despite his wisdom, Solomon's heart was led astray by his foreign wives, who worshipped other gods. This turning away is a fulfillment of the warning in Deuteronomy 7:3-4, which cautioned against intermarriage with foreign nations to prevent the Israelites from being led into idolatry. Solomon's apostasy had significant consequences, leading to the division of the kingdom after his death, as prophesied in 1 Kings 11:11-13. This serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of faithfulness to God and the dangers of compromising one's beliefs.

For when Solomon grew old
As Solomon aged, his spiritual vigilance waned. This period of his life contrasts with his earlier years when he sought wisdom from God (1 Kings 3:9). Aging can bring challenges in maintaining spiritual fervor, as seen in other biblical figures like Eli (1 Samuel 3:2-3).

his wives turned his heart after other gods
Solomon's marriages to foreign women, contrary to Deuteronomy 7:3-4, led him into idolatry. These alliances were often political, but they introduced pagan worship practices into Israel. This reflects the danger of unequal yoking (2 Corinthians 6:14) and the influence of close relationships on one's faith.

and he was not wholeheartedly devoted to the LORD his God
Solomon's divided heart contrasts with the Shema's call for total devotion (Deuteronomy 6:5). His failure to remain fully committed to God led to spiritual decline and set a precedent for Israel's future idolatry, eventually resulting in the kingdom's division (1 Kings 12).

as his father David had been
David, despite his sins, is remembered for his wholehearted devotion to God (Acts 13:22). His repentance and faithfulness serve as a standard for kingship in Israel. David's life foreshadows the perfect kingship of Jesus Christ, who is fully devoted to the Father (John 8:29).

Solomon followed Ashtoreth
Solomon, known for his wisdom, wealth, and building projects, including the Temple in Jerusalem, fell into idolatry in his later years. Ashtoreth, also known as Astarte or Ishtar, was a prominent goddess in the ancient Near East, associated with love, war, and fertility. Her worship often involved ritual prostitution and was condemned by the God of Israel. Solomon's following of Ashtoreth signifies a departure from exclusive worship of Yahweh, influenced by his foreign wives (1 Kings 11:1-4). This act of idolatry was a direct violation of the first commandment (Exodus 20:3) and led to divine judgment on his kingdom.

the goddess of the Sidonians
The Sidonians were a Phoenician people living in the city of Sidon, located in modern-day Lebanon. They were known for their maritime trade and polytheistic religion. Ashtoreth was one of their chief deities, and her worship was widespread in the region. The influence of the Sidonians and their gods on Israel highlights the dangers of cultural assimilation and the temptation to adopt foreign religious practices, which were prevalent in the ancient world.

and Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites
Milcom, also known as Molech, was the national god of the Ammonites, a people descended from Lot (Genesis 19:36-38). Worship of Milcom often involved child sacrifice, a practice detestable to the God of Israel (Leviticus 18:21). The term "abomination" underscores the severity of this idolatry in the eyes of God. Solomon's worship of Milcom represents a significant moral and spiritual decline, as he not only tolerated but participated in practices that were strictly forbidden (Deuteronomy 12:31). This idolatry contributed to the eventual division of the kingdom after Solomon's death (1 Kings 11:11-13).

So Solomon did evil in the sight of the LORD;
Solomon, despite his wisdom and the blessings he received from God, turned away from the commandments of the LORD. This phrase indicates a moral and spiritual failure, highlighting the gravity of his actions. The "evil" refers to idolatry and the influence of his foreign wives, which led him to worship other gods (1 Kings 11:1-5). In biblical context, doing evil in the sight of the LORD often results in divine judgment, as seen throughout the Old Testament. This phrase underscores the seriousness of disobedience to God, especially for a king who was meant to lead Israel in righteousness.

unlike his father David,
David, despite his own sins, is often remembered for his heart that sought after God (1 Samuel 13:14; Acts 13:22). David's repentance and his deep relationship with God set a standard for the kings of Israel. This comparison highlights Solomon's failure to maintain the same level of devotion and integrity. David's life, though flawed, was marked by a sincere commitment to God, which Solomon lacked in his later years. This contrast serves as a reminder of the importance of faithfulness and repentance.

he did not follow the LORD completely.
Solomon's partial obedience is a cautionary tale about the dangers of compromise. While he initially followed God's statutes, his heart was eventually led astray by his alliances and marriages to foreign women, which were against God's commands (Deuteronomy 17:17). This incomplete devotion is a recurring theme in Scripture, where God desires wholehearted commitment (Deuteronomy 6:5). Solomon's failure to follow the LORD completely resulted in the division of the kingdom after his death, fulfilling the prophecy given to him (1 Kings 11:11-13). This serves as a warning of the consequences of divided loyalty and the importance of steadfastness in faith.

At that time
This phrase indicates a specific period during Solomon's reign, particularly in his later years when his heart had turned away from the LORD due to his foreign wives (1 Kings 11:4). It marks a significant shift from Solomon's earlier devotion to God, as seen in his construction of the temple in Jerusalem.

on a hill east of Jerusalem
The location is significant as it refers to the Mount of Olives, a site with deep biblical connections. This area later becomes important in the New Testament, notably in the life of Jesus (Matthew 24:3, Acts 1:12). The choice of this location for idolatrous worship highlights the stark contrast between the worship of Yahweh in the temple and the pagan practices introduced by Solomon.

Solomon built a high place
High places were elevated sites often used for worship and sacrifices. Despite God's clear commands against idolatry (Exodus 20:3-5), Solomon's actions reflect a compromise of his faith, influenced by his marriages to foreign women who worshipped other gods (1 Kings 11:1-3). This act of building high places is a direct violation of Deuteronomy 12:2-4, where God commands the destruction of such sites.

for Chemosh the abomination of Moab
Chemosh was the national deity of the Moabites, often associated with war and destruction. The term "abomination" underscores the detestable nature of this idol in the eyes of the LORD. The Moabites were descendants of Lot (Genesis 19:37), and their worship practices were in direct opposition to the worship of Yahweh. This connection to Moab highlights the political alliances Solomon formed through marriage, which led to religious syncretism.

and for Molech the abomination of the Ammonites
Molech was another detestable deity, associated with child sacrifice (Leviticus 18:21, Jeremiah 32:35). The Ammonites, like the Moabites, were descendants of Lot (Genesis 19:38). The worship of Molech was strictly forbidden in Israel, and Solomon's construction of a high place for this god represents a grave departure from the covenantal laws given to Israel. This act foreshadows the eventual division and downfall of the kingdom due to idolatry (1 Kings 11:11-13).

Solomon's actions in this verse serve as a warning against the dangers of compromising one's faith and the consequences of turning away from God's commandments. The introduction of idolatry set a precedent that would plague Israel and Judah for generations, ultimately leading to exile.

He did the same for all his foreign wives
Solomon's actions in building high places for his foreign wives reflect a departure from the exclusive worship of Yahweh, which was central to Israel's covenant identity. This phrase highlights Solomon's accommodation of his wives' religious practices, which was contrary to the command in Deuteronomy 7:3-4, warning against intermarriage with foreign nations to prevent idolatry. Solomon's marriages were often political alliances, common in the ancient Near East, but they led to spiritual compromise. This action foreshadows the division of the kingdom after Solomon's reign, as his heart was turned away from God.

who burned incense and sacrificed to their gods
The burning of incense and offering sacrifices were integral parts of ancient religious practices, signifying devotion and worship. These acts were performed by Solomon's wives to their native deities, such as Ashtoreth, Milcom, and Chemosh, as mentioned earlier in the chapter. This practice was in direct violation of the first commandment (Exodus 20:3) and the Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4-5), which emphasized the worship of Yahweh alone. The presence of these foreign religious practices in Israel contributed to the spiritual decline of the nation and set a precedent for future kings who would also lead the people into idolatry. This situation contrasts with the typology of Christ, who remained faithful and obedient to God, fulfilling the law and the prophets (Matthew 5:17). Solomon's failure serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of syncretism and the importance of maintaining fidelity to God.

Now the LORD grew angry with Solomon
The anger of the LORD is a recurring theme in the Old Testament, often in response to covenant unfaithfulness. God's anger is not capricious but is a righteous response to sin and disobedience. Solomon, despite his wisdom and the blessings he received, failed to uphold the covenant by turning to idolatry. This anger reflects God's holiness and justice, as He cannot tolerate sin, especially from those He has chosen and blessed.

because his heart had turned away from the LORD
The heart in biblical terms often refers to the center of one's being, including mind, will, and emotions. Solomon's heart turning away signifies a deep-seated apostasy, not just a momentary lapse. This turning away is significant because Solomon had been given wisdom and understanding beyond any other king. His heart's departure from God is a cautionary tale about the dangers of complacency and the influence of foreign alliances and marriages, which led him to idolatry.

the God of Israel
This title emphasizes the covenant relationship between God and the nation of Israel. It underscores the special status Israel held as God's chosen people, a status that came with responsibilities and expectations. Solomon's actions were not just personal failings but had national implications, as the king's faithfulness was integral to the nation's covenantal blessings.

who had appeared to him twice
God's appearances to Solomon were significant events, marking divine favor and communication. The first appearance was at Gibeon, where God granted Solomon wisdom (1 Kings 3:5-14), and the second was after the dedication of the temple, where God reaffirmed His covenant with Solomon (1 Kings 9:2-9). These appearances highlight the gravity of Solomon's sin, as he turned away despite direct encounters with God. This serves as a reminder of the seriousness of turning away from God after receiving clear revelation and blessings.

Although He had warned Solomon explicitly
God's warnings to Solomon were clear and direct, emphasizing the importance of obedience. This reflects God's consistent communication with His chosen leaders, as seen with Adam, Noah, and Moses. The explicit nature of the warning underscores the seriousness of the covenant relationship between God and Israel. Solomon's wisdom, a gift from God, should have guided him to heed these warnings, yet he failed to do so.

not to follow other gods
The command against idolatry is a central tenet of the Mosaic Law, as seen in the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:3-5). Solomon's marriages to foreign women led him to worship their gods, such as Ashtoreth and Milcom, which was a direct violation of God's law. This reflects the broader biblical theme of Israel's struggle with idolatry, which often led to their downfall and exile.

Solomon did not keep the LORD’s command
Solomon's failure to obey God's command marks a turning point in his reign and the history of Israel. Despite his wisdom and the blessings he received, Solomon's heart turned away from God, leading to the division of the kingdom after his death. This disobedience serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of complacency and the seduction of worldly influences. It also foreshadows the need for a perfect king, fulfilled in Jesus Christ, who perfectly obeyed the Father and established an eternal kingdom.

Then the LORD said to Solomon
This phrase indicates direct communication from God to Solomon, highlighting the personal relationship and accountability between them. Solomon, known for his wisdom, was chosen by God to lead Israel, but his actions led to divine intervention. This reflects the biblical principle that leaders are held to high standards (James 3:1).

Because you have done this
The "this" refers to Solomon's idolatry and turning away from God, influenced by his foreign wives (1 Kings 11:1-8). This disobedience is a direct violation of God's commands, showing the consequences of compromising faith for political or personal gain.

and have not kept My covenant and My statutes
God's covenant with Solomon was conditional, requiring obedience to His laws (1 Kings 9:4-9). The covenant included blessings for obedience and consequences for disobedience, reflecting the Deuteronomic principle of blessings and curses (Deuteronomy 28).

which I have commanded you
This emphasizes the personal responsibility Solomon had to adhere to God's commands. It underscores the importance of obedience to divine instruction, a recurring theme throughout Scripture (1 Samuel 15:22).

I will tear the kingdom away from you
The imagery of tearing signifies a violent and decisive action. This prophecy foretells the division of Israel, which occurs after Solomon's death when the kingdom splits into Israel and Judah (1 Kings 12). It serves as a warning of the severe consequences of disobedience.

and give it to your servant
This refers to Jeroboam, who was a servant of Solomon and would become the first king of the northern kingdom of Israel (1 Kings 11:26-40). This transfer of power illustrates God's sovereignty in raising and deposing leaders (Daniel 2:21). It also foreshadows the ultimate fulfillment of God's promises through Jesus Christ, the servant King (Philippians 2:7).

Nevertheless, for the sake of your father David
This phrase highlights the enduring covenant God made with David, emphasizing the importance of David's faithfulness and God's promise to him. David is often seen as a type of Christ, a king whose lineage would lead to the Messiah. The Davidic Covenant, found in 2 Samuel 7:12-16, promised that David's throne would be established forever, which is ultimately fulfilled in Jesus Christ. This covenant underscores God's faithfulness to His promises despite human failure.

I will not do it during your lifetime
God's decision to delay the division of the kingdom until after Solomon's death demonstrates His mercy and patience. It reflects the biblical principle that God often withholds immediate judgment, allowing time for repentance. This delay also serves as a testament to God's respect for David, as Solomon's reign is preserved for his sake. The concept of divine patience is echoed in 2 Peter 3:9, where God is described as patient, not wanting anyone to perish.

I will tear it out of the hand of your son
This phrase foretells the division of the united kingdom of Israel, which occurs under Solomon's son, Rehoboam. The tearing of the kingdom is a direct consequence of Solomon's idolatry and disobedience, as detailed earlier in 1 Kings 11. The imagery of tearing signifies a violent and decisive action, reflecting the seriousness of Israel's spiritual apostasy. This event fulfills the prophecy given to Jeroboam by the prophet Ahijah in 1 Kings 11:29-31, where the kingdom is symbolically torn into pieces. The division of the kingdom serves as a historical turning point, leading to the separate kingdoms of Israel and Judah.

Yet I will not tear the whole kingdom away from him.
This phrase indicates God's judgment tempered with mercy. Despite Solomon's idolatry, God chooses not to completely remove the kingdom from his lineage. This reflects God's covenantal faithfulness, as seen in His promises to David in 2 Samuel 7:12-16. The division of the kingdom is a direct consequence of Solomon's disobedience, yet God's grace ensures that the Davidic line continues, highlighting His commitment to His promises.

I will give one tribe to your son
The "one tribe" refers to the tribe of Judah, which remains under the rule of Solomon's son, Rehoboam. This decision preserves the Davidic line, fulfilling God's promise to David. Historically, the tribe of Benjamin also aligns with Judah, forming the Southern Kingdom. This division sets the stage for the split between the Northern Kingdom (Israel) and the Southern Kingdom (Judah), a pivotal moment in Israel's history.

for the sake of My servant David
God's decision is rooted in His covenant with David, emphasizing the importance of David's faithfulness and God's enduring promise to establish his throne forever. This covenant is a central theme in the Old Testament, pointing forward to the coming of Jesus Christ, the ultimate fulfillment of the Davidic line, as seen in the genealogies in Matthew 1 and Luke 3.

and for the sake of Jerusalem,
Jerusalem holds a special place as the city chosen by God for His temple and His presence. It is the political and spiritual center of Israel. The preservation of Jerusalem underlines its significance in God's redemptive plan, as it later becomes the site of Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection, pivotal events in Christian theology.

which I have chosen.”
God's choice of Jerusalem and the Davidic line underscores His sovereign will and purpose. This divine election is a recurring theme throughout Scripture, illustrating God's control over history and His plan for salvation. The choice of Jerusalem as the focal point of worship and the Davidic line as the royal lineage culminates in the New Testament with the coming of Christ, who establishes a new covenant and kingdom.

Then the LORD raised up against Solomon an adversary
This phrase indicates divine intervention in the political affairs of Israel. The LORD's action here is a response to Solomon's disobedience, particularly his idolatry and turning away from God (1 Kings 11:1-13). The term "adversary" (Hebrew: "satan") is used to describe someone who opposes or acts as an enemy. This is a fulfillment of God's warning to Solomon that if he or his descendants turned away from following Him, He would raise up adversaries (1 Kings 9:6-9). This reflects the covenantal relationship between God and Israel, where blessings and curses are contingent upon obedience (Deuteronomy 28).

Hadad the Edomite
Hadad is identified as an Edomite, linking him to the descendants of Esau, Jacob's brother (Genesis 36:1). The Edomites had a long history of enmity with Israel, dating back to the time of the Exodus when they refused passage to the Israelites (Numbers 20:14-21). This historical animosity provides context for Hadad's opposition to Solomon. The name Hadad is also associated with a storm god in the ancient Near East, suggesting a possible cultural or religious significance.

from the royal line of Edom
This detail emphasizes Hadad's noble heritage, suggesting he had a legitimate claim to leadership and influence among the Edomites. The royal line of Edom is traced back to Esau, and the mention of Hadad's lineage underscores the political and dynastic dimensions of his opposition to Solomon. This connection to the royal line may have bolstered Hadad's ability to rally support against Israel. Historically, Edom was a vassal state under David and Solomon, and Hadad's rebellion can be seen as an attempt to restore Edomite independence.

Earlier, when David was in Edom
This phrase refers to a time during King David's reign when he was involved in military campaigns. Edom, located to the south of the Kingdom of Israel, was a frequent adversary of Israel. The Edomites were descendants of Esau, Jacob's brother, which adds a layer of familial tension to their conflicts. David's presence in Edom suggests a period of military activity aimed at subduing this neighboring nation, which was strategically important due to its control of trade routes and resources.

Joab the commander of the army
Joab was a key military leader under King David, known for his loyalty and effectiveness in battle, though also for his ruthlessness. As David's nephew, Joab held significant influence and was often involved in executing David's military strategies. His actions in Edom reflect his role as a decisive and sometimes brutal enforcer of David's policies.

had gone to bury the dead
This indicates a customary practice of honoring fallen soldiers by ensuring they received a proper burial. In the context of ancient Near Eastern warfare, burying the dead was an important ritual, reflecting respect for the deceased and adherence to cultural norms. It also suggests the aftermath of a significant battle or series of skirmishes in Edom.

and had struck down every male in Edom
This phrase highlights the severity of Joab's campaign in Edom. The complete destruction of the male population was a common practice in ancient warfare to prevent future retaliation and to weaken the enemy's ability to recover. This action fulfilled David's strategic objectives but also set the stage for future hostilities, as seen in the ongoing enmity between Israel and Edom. This act of violence can be compared to other biblical instances where entire populations were targeted, reflecting the harsh realities of ancient conflicts.

Joab and all Israel
Joab, the commander of King David's army, was a key military leader in Israel. His actions often reflected the political and military strategies of the time. Israel, under King David, was expanding its territory and influence. This phrase indicates a collective military effort, highlighting the unity and strength of Israel's forces. Joab's leadership is significant, as he was known for his loyalty to David, though his methods were sometimes ruthless.

had stayed there six months
The six-month duration suggests a prolonged military campaign, indicating the strategic importance of Edom. This extended period reflects the challenges of ancient warfare, including logistics, supply lines, and maintaining troop morale. The length of the campaign underscores the determination of Israel to secure its borders and eliminate threats.

until he had killed every male in Edom
This phrase highlights the severity of the campaign against Edom, a neighboring nation often in conflict with Israel. The complete destruction of the male population was a common ancient practice to prevent future retaliation and ensure dominance. This act fulfilled earlier prophecies and judgments against Edom, as seen in Obadiah and other prophetic books. Theologically, it reflects the divine judgment against nations opposing God's chosen people, though it raises ethical questions about warfare and justice.

But Hadad, still just a young boy
Hadad was a member of the royal family of Edom, a nation descended from Esau, Jacob's brother. The mention of Hadad being a "young boy" highlights his vulnerability and the precarious situation of his family. In biblical narratives, God often uses the young and seemingly insignificant to fulfill His purposes, as seen with David and Joseph. This phrase sets the stage for Hadad's later role in opposing Solomon, reflecting the theme of God raising adversaries against those who stray from His commandments.

had fled to Egypt
Egypt was a common place of refuge in the ancient Near East due to its political stability and distance from Israel. This flight to Egypt is reminiscent of other biblical figures who sought refuge there, such as Abraham and later, the Holy Family with Jesus. Egypt's role as a place of refuge and its complex relationship with Israel is a recurring theme in the Bible, symbolizing both protection and potential idolatry.

along with some Edomites who were servants of his father
The Edomites accompanying Hadad were likely loyalists to the Edomite royal family, indicating that Hadad had a support network even in exile. This detail underscores the political alliances and familial loyalties that were crucial in the ancient world. The Edomites' presence in Egypt also foreshadows future conflicts between Edom and Israel, as these exiles would harbor resentment and seek to reclaim their homeland. This situation parallels the broader biblical narrative of exile and return, a theme that resonates with the Israelites' own experiences.

Hadad and his men set out from Midian
Midian was a region located in the northwestern part of the Arabian Peninsula, often associated with the descendants of Abraham through his wife Keturah. This area is significant in biblical history as it was where Moses fled after killing an Egyptian and where he encountered God in the burning bush. The mention of Midian here indicates a starting point for Hadad's journey, suggesting a strategic retreat or regrouping before moving towards Egypt. The Midianites were known for their nomadic lifestyle and trade, which might have facilitated Hadad's movement.

and went to Paran.
Paran is a desert region mentioned several times in the Old Testament, often associated with the wilderness wanderings of the Israelites. It is located in the Sinai Peninsula, south of Canaan. The journey from Midian to Paran would have been arduous, indicating Hadad's determination and possibly his strategic planning to gather support. Paran's mention also connects to the broader narrative of God's people in the wilderness, highlighting themes of exile and divine providence.

They took men from Paran with them
This phrase suggests that Hadad was able to gather additional support from the inhabitants of Paran. This could imply that there were sympathizers or mercenaries willing to join his cause. The recruitment of men from Paran indicates a growing force, which would have been necessary for Hadad's plans to challenge Solomon's rule. This action reflects the common ancient Near Eastern practice of forming alliances and building coalitions for military or political purposes.

and went to Egypt,
Egypt was a powerful and influential kingdom during this period, often serving as a place of refuge or alliance for those opposing Israel. The journey to Egypt signifies a strategic move by Hadad, seeking support from a major power. Egypt's historical role as both a place of refuge and a source of oppression for the Israelites adds complexity to Hadad's actions, as he seeks aid from a nation that had previously enslaved his ancestors.

to Pharaoh king of Egypt,
The Pharaoh at this time would have been a significant political figure, capable of providing military and economic support. The relationship between Israel and Egypt was complex, with periods of both conflict and cooperation. By approaching Pharaoh, Hadad was aligning himself with a powerful ally, potentially threatening Solomon's reign. This move reflects the broader geopolitical dynamics of the region, where smaller states often sought the backing of larger empires.

who gave Hadad a house and land
Pharaoh's provision of a house and land to Hadad indicates a formal acceptance and support of his cause. This gesture would have been significant, as it not only provided Hadad with a base of operations but also signaled Pharaoh's endorsement. In the ancient Near East, such gifts were often used to solidify alliances and demonstrate loyalty. This act of hospitality contrasts with the typical portrayal of Egypt as an adversary, highlighting the complexities of international relations.

and provided him with food.
The provision of food further underscores Pharaoh's commitment to supporting Hadad. In a time when resources were often scarce, especially for exiles or refugees, this act of generosity would have been crucial for Hadad's survival and the maintenance of his followers. This support reflects the ancient practice of patronage, where powerful rulers would sustain those who could serve their interests. It also echoes the biblical theme of divine provision, as seen in God's care for His people throughout their history.

There Hadad found such great favor in the sight of Pharaoh
Hadad, an Edomite prince, fled to Egypt after David's military campaigns against Edom. His favor with Pharaoh indicates a political alliance, as Egypt often provided refuge to foreign dignitaries. This reflects the complex political landscape of the ancient Near East, where Egypt was a significant power. The favor Hadad found suggests he was seen as valuable, possibly due to his royal lineage or potential to destabilize Israel, which was a common strategy among rival nations.

that he gave to him in marriage the sister of Queen Tahpenes, his own wife
Marriage alliances were common in the ancient world to secure political ties. By marrying the sister of Queen Tahpenes, Hadad was integrated into the Egyptian royal family, indicating a high level of trust and honor. This alliance would have strengthened Hadad's position and influence, potentially providing him with resources to challenge Solomon's rule. The mention of Queen Tahpenes highlights the importance of women in royal diplomacy, as they often played crucial roles in maintaining alliances. This marriage also underscores the interconnectedness of the region's politics, where personal relationships could significantly impact national affairs.

And the sister of Tahpenes bore Hadad a son named Genubath.
This phrase introduces us to a significant familial connection within the Egyptian royal court. Tahpenes is identified as the queen or a high-ranking woman in Pharaoh's household, indicating Hadad's integration into Egyptian society. The birth of Genubath to Hadad, an Edomite prince, signifies the continuation of Hadad's lineage despite his exile. This connection to Egypt highlights the political alliances and familial ties that were common in the ancient Near East, where marriages often served to solidify alliances between nations. The name Genubath, meaning "theft" or "robbery," may reflect the circumstances of his birth or future actions, though the text does not elaborate further.

Tahpenes herself weaned him in Pharaoh’s palace,
The act of Tahpenes weaning Genubath in Pharaoh's palace underscores the privileged status of Hadad's family within Egypt. Weaning was a significant milestone in a child's life, often celebrated with a feast, and being weaned by a member of the royal household would have been a mark of honor and acceptance. This detail emphasizes the close relationship between Hadad and the Egyptian royal family, suggesting that Genubath was raised with the same care and attention as the Egyptian princes. It also reflects the cultural practice of wet-nursing and child-rearing in royal courts, where children of political significance were often raised in the palace to ensure loyalty and integration into the ruling class.

and Genubath lived there among the sons of Pharaoh.
Genubath's upbringing among the sons of Pharaoh indicates his assimilation into the Egyptian royal family, providing him with a unique position of influence and education. This environment would have exposed him to the political, cultural, and religious practices of Egypt, potentially shaping his future actions and loyalties. Living among Pharaoh's sons suggests that Genubath was considered part of the royal household, which could have implications for his identity and future role in regional politics. This setting also foreshadows the complex relationships between Israel and Egypt, as seen throughout the biblical narrative, where Egypt often plays a dual role as both refuge and adversary.

When Hadad heard in Egypt
Hadad was an Edomite prince who fled to Egypt as a child when David conquered Edom. Egypt, during this period, was a place of refuge for political exiles. The mention of Egypt highlights the historical ties and tensions between Israel and Egypt, a recurring theme throughout the Old Testament.

that David had rested with his fathers
This phrase indicates David's death, a common biblical euphemism for dying. David's reign was marked by military success and the establishment of Jerusalem as the political and spiritual center of Israel. His death marked the end of an era and a potential shift in political dynamics, which Hadad saw as an opportunity.

and that Joab, the commander of the army, was dead
Joab was a formidable military leader under David, known for his strategic prowess and sometimes ruthless actions. His death, along with David's, signaled a weakening of the established order, creating a power vacuum that Hadad hoped to exploit. Joab's death is significant as it removed a key figure who had been instrumental in maintaining Israel's dominance.

he said to Pharaoh, “Let me go,
Hadad's request to Pharaoh indicates the diplomatic relations between Egypt and Edom. Pharaoh's willingness to host Hadad suggests a strategic alliance or at least a mutual interest in countering Israel's influence. This reflects the complex political landscape of the ancient Near East, where alliances were often fluid and opportunistic.

that I may return to my own country.”
Hadad's desire to return to Edom signifies his intent to reclaim his heritage and possibly lead a revolt against Solomon, David's successor. This reflects the ongoing enmity between Israel and Edom, rooted in the ancestral conflict between Jacob and Esau. Hadad's return can be seen as part of the broader narrative of opposition to Solomon's reign, which included other adversaries raised by God as a consequence of Solomon's disobedience.

But Pharaoh asked him,
Pharaoh, the ruler of Egypt, plays a significant role in the biblical narrative, often representing a political power that interacts with Israel. In this context, Pharaoh's question indicates a relationship of favor and hospitality towards Hadad, an Edomite prince. This reflects the historical alliances and tensions between Egypt and neighboring nations. Pharaoh's inquiry suggests a level of concern or curiosity about Hadad's motives, highlighting the political dynamics of the time.

“What have you lacked here with me
Pharaoh's question implies that Hadad has been well-treated and lacks nothing in Egypt. This reflects the custom of ancient Near Eastern hospitality, where a host was expected to provide for the needs of their guest. It also suggests that Hadad had a privileged status in Pharaoh's court, possibly due to political alliances or personal favor. The question underscores the expectation of loyalty and gratitude from those who receive such hospitality.

that you suddenly want to go back to your own country?”
The sudden desire to return to his homeland indicates a strong sense of national identity and personal mission for Hadad. This reflects the broader biblical theme of longing for one's homeland, as seen in the Israelites' desire to return to the Promised Land. The phrase also suggests a potential political or personal motivation for Hadad's return, possibly to reclaim his position or influence in Edom. This mirrors the biblical narrative of exile and return, a recurring theme in the Old Testament.

“Nothing,” Hadad replied,
Hadad's response of "Nothing" indicates that his decision to leave is not due to any lack or mistreatment in Egypt. This highlights his contentment with Pharaoh's provision but also suggests a deeper calling or purpose driving his decision. The simplicity of his reply may reflect a diplomatic or respectful tone, acknowledging Pharaoh's generosity while asserting his own intentions.

“but please let me go.”
Hadad's polite request to leave demonstrates respect for Pharaoh's authority and the formalities of court protocol. This reflects the cultural norms of seeking permission from a ruler before departing, emphasizing the hierarchical structures of ancient societies. The request also indicates Hadad's determination to pursue his own path, possibly foreshadowing future events in the biblical narrative where individuals are called to leave their current circumstances to fulfill a greater purpose.

And God raised up against Solomon another adversary
This phrase indicates divine intervention in the political affairs of Israel. The term "raised up" suggests that God actively allowed or caused this adversary to come against Solomon, reflecting the consequences of Solomon's disobedience and idolatry. This is consistent with the biblical theme that God uses foreign nations or leaders to discipline His people (e.g., Judges 2:14). The adversary is a tool in God's hands to fulfill His purposes, similar to how He used the Assyrians and Babylonians later in Israel's history.

Rezon the son of Eliada
Rezon is introduced as a significant figure who opposes Solomon. His lineage, being the son of Eliada, is mentioned, which was a common practice to establish identity and legitimacy. Rezon's opposition is part of the broader narrative of political unrest during Solomon's reign, which contrasts with the peace and prosperity earlier in his rule. This unrest foreshadows the eventual division of the kingdom after Solomon's death.

who had fled from his master, Hadadezer king of Zobah
Rezon's background as a fugitive from Hadadezer, king of Zobah, provides historical context. Zobah was a significant Aramean kingdom located in modern-day Syria. This detail connects to earlier biblical accounts where David defeated Hadadezer (2 Samuel 8:3-8), indicating ongoing tensions between Israel and surrounding nations. Rezon's flight suggests a personal vendetta against Israel, as he likely harbored resentment from David's earlier victories. This enmity is part of the larger narrative of Israel's complex relationships with neighboring states, which often involved shifting alliances and conflicts.

and had gathered men to himself
Rezon, like many leaders in ancient times, gathered a group of followers or mercenaries. This reflects a common practice where individuals with military prowess or leadership skills attracted others seeking protection or gain. This gathering of men can be seen as a precursor to forming a political or military faction, similar to how David gathered his mighty men (1 Samuel 22:2).

When David killed the Zobaites
This refers to David's military campaigns against various groups, including the Zobaites, who were likely part of the Aramean confederation. David's victories over these groups are recorded in 2 Samuel 8:3-8, where he expanded Israel's territory and influence. The defeat of the Zobaites would have created a power vacuum, allowing figures like Rezon to rise.

Rezon captained a band of raiders
Rezon's role as a captain of raiders indicates his leadership and tactical skills. Bands of raiders were common in the ancient Near East, often surviving by plundering settlements and caravans. This activity would have been disruptive to established powers, similar to the raids conducted by David before he became king (1 Samuel 27:8-11).

and went to Damascus
Damascus, one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities in the world, was a strategic location in the ancient Near East. By moving to Damascus, Rezon positioned himself in a key trade and military hub. This move mirrors the strategic relocations of other biblical figures, such as Abraham's journey to Canaan (Genesis 12:1-5).

where they settled and gained control
Rezon's settlement and control of Damascus suggest a successful establishment of power, likely through both military strength and political alliances. This control foreshadows the later prominence of Damascus as a center of Aramean power, which would become a significant adversary to Israel (2 Kings 16:9). Rezon's actions can be seen as part of the larger narrative of God's sovereignty over the rise and fall of nations, as seen throughout the prophetic books.

Rezon was Israel’s enemy throughout the days of Solomon
Rezon, son of Eliada, was a significant adversary to Israel during Solomon's reign. His enmity is rooted in the political fragmentation following King David's consolidation of power. Rezon had fled from his master, Hadadezer, king of Zobah, after David's victories (2 Samuel 8:3-8). Establishing himself in Damascus, Rezon became a thorn in Solomon's side, symbolizing the external threats that arose due to Solomon's internal compromises, such as his marriages to foreign women and idolatry (1 Kings 11:1-8). This period marks a shift from the peace and prosperity of Solomon's early reign to increasing instability.

adding to the trouble caused by Hadad
Hadad the Edomite was another adversary who rose against Solomon. He had fled to Egypt as a child after Joab, David's commander, decimated Edom (1 Kings 11:14-22). Upon returning, Hadad sought to reclaim his position and territory, further destabilizing Solomon's kingdom. The combined threats of Rezon and Hadad illustrate the fulfillment of God's warning to Solomon about the consequences of turning away from Him (1 Kings 11:9-13). These adversaries represent the divine judgment and the fracturing of the united monarchy, foreshadowing the eventual division of Israel.

So Rezon ruled over Aram with hostility toward Israel
Rezon's rule over Aram (modern-day Syria) established a powerful kingdom that consistently opposed Israel. Aram's strategic location and military strength posed a significant threat to Israel's northern borders. This hostility is part of a broader narrative of Israel's ongoing struggles with neighboring nations, which often served as instruments of divine discipline. The enmity between Aram and Israel continued into the reigns of subsequent kings, such as Ahab and Jehoram, highlighting the persistent geopolitical tensions in the region (2 Kings 6:8-23). Rezon's opposition underscores the theme of Israel's reliance on God for protection and the consequences of disobedience.

Now Jeroboam son of Nebat
Jeroboam's introduction as the son of Nebat is significant in establishing his lineage and identity. The name "Jeroboam" means "the people will contend" or "he increases the people," which foreshadows his future role in leading a rebellion. Nebat, his father, is not mentioned elsewhere in the Bible, indicating that Jeroboam's rise to prominence was not due to a notable family background but rather his own actions and God's purposes.

was an Ephraimite from Zeredah
Being an Ephraimite places Jeroboam within the tribe of Ephraim, one of the most prominent tribes of Israel, often associated with leadership and strength. Ephraim was a son of Joseph, and the tribe held significant influence in the northern kingdom. Zeredah, his hometown, is not well-documented archaeologically, but its mention highlights Jeroboam's roots in the northern part of Israel, which would later become the center of his kingdom.

whose mother was a widow named Zeruah
The mention of Jeroboam's mother, Zeruah, as a widow, provides insight into his social status. In ancient Israel, widows were often vulnerable and lacked economic support, suggesting that Jeroboam may have risen from humble beginnings. This detail emphasizes God's ability to raise leaders from unexpected places, a theme seen throughout Scripture.

Jeroboam was a servant of Solomon
Jeroboam's role as a servant, or more accurately, an official under Solomon, indicates his initial loyalty and position within the king's administration. This position allowed him to gain insight into the workings of the kingdom and Solomon's policies, which later influenced his actions. His service under Solomon also highlights the irony of his eventual rebellion against the very king he once served.

but he rebelled against the king
Jeroboam's rebellion is a pivotal moment in Israel's history, leading to the division of the united monarchy. His revolt was not merely a personal ambition but was prophesied by the prophet Ahijah as a divine judgment against Solomon's idolatry and disobedience (1 Kings 11:29-39). This rebellion fulfilled God's word and set the stage for the northern kingdom of Israel. Jeroboam's actions also serve as a cautionary tale about the consequences of turning away from God's commandments, as his reign was marked by idolatry and conflict.

and this is the account of his rebellion against the king.
This phrase introduces the narrative of Jeroboam's rebellion against King Solomon. Jeroboam, an Ephraimite, was a servant of Solomon who rose to prominence due to his industrious nature. The rebellion is significant as it marks the beginning of the division of the united monarchy of Israel. This event fulfills the prophecy given by the prophet Ahijah, who foretold the division of the kingdom due to Solomon's idolatry and disobedience to God's commandments (1 Kings 11:29-39). The rebellion is a pivotal moment in Israel's history, leading to the establishment of the northern kingdom of Israel under Jeroboam.

Solomon had built the supporting terraces
The supporting terraces, also known as the Millo, were part of Solomon's extensive building projects in Jerusalem. These terraces were likely a series of earthworks or retaining walls that supported the expansion of the city. Archaeological evidence suggests that such structures were crucial for the development of ancient cities, providing stability and additional space for construction. Solomon's building projects, including the Temple and his palace, were grand and required significant resources and labor, which contributed to the discontent among the people and set the stage for Jeroboam's rebellion.

and repaired the gap in the wall of the city of his father David.
The repair of the gap in the wall indicates Solomon's efforts to fortify Jerusalem, enhancing its defenses and infrastructure. The city of David refers to the original settlement of Jerusalem, which David captured and established as his capital. Strengthening the city's fortifications was essential for maintaining security and asserting royal authority. This action reflects Solomon's administrative and military priorities but also highlights the burdens placed on the population, as such projects demanded heavy taxation and labor. The mention of David connects Solomon's reign to his father's legacy, emphasizing the continuity of the Davidic dynasty, which holds messianic significance in biblical prophecy, pointing to the future reign of Jesus Christ as the ultimate fulfillment of the Davidic covenant.

Now Jeroboam was a mighty man of valor.
Jeroboam, the son of Nebat, is introduced as a "mighty man of valor," a term often used in the Old Testament to describe someone with exceptional courage and leadership abilities. This phrase is reminiscent of descriptions of other biblical figures like Gideon (Judges 6:12) and David (1 Samuel 16:18), indicating Jeroboam's potential for leadership and military prowess. His valor sets the stage for his future role as a leader of the northern tribes of Israel.

So when Solomon noticed that the young man was industrious,
Solomon, known for his wisdom, recognized Jeroboam's industrious nature. The term "industrious" suggests that Jeroboam was not only hardworking but also efficient and effective in his tasks. This recognition by Solomon highlights Jeroboam's capabilities and foreshadows his rise to prominence. It also reflects the biblical principle that diligence and hard work are often rewarded, as seen in Proverbs 22:29.

he put him in charge of the whole labor force of the house of Joseph.
The "house of Joseph" refers to the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh, descendants of Joseph, who were significant and influential tribes in Israel. By placing Jeroboam in charge of the labor force, Solomon entrusted him with a position of considerable responsibility and authority. This decision indicates Jeroboam's leadership skills and the trust Solomon placed in him. Historically, this labor force was involved in Solomon's extensive building projects, including the construction of the temple and other infrastructure. Jeroboam's role here is pivotal, as it positions him within the socio-political structure of Israel, setting the stage for his eventual rebellion and the division of the kingdom, as prophesied by Ahijah the Shilonite (1 Kings 11:29-31).

During that time
This phrase situates the event within the broader narrative of Solomon's reign. It was a period marked by Solomon's departure from exclusive worship of Yahweh, leading to the rise of adversaries and internal strife. The timing is significant as it sets the stage for the division of the kingdom, a pivotal moment in Israel's history.

the prophet Ahijah the Shilonite
Ahijah was a prophet from Shiloh, a town with historical significance as the location of the Tabernacle before the temple was built in Jerusalem. Prophets played crucial roles as God's messengers, often delivering messages of judgment or future events. Ahijah's role here is to convey God's plan for the division of the kingdom, highlighting the prophetic tradition of speaking truth to power.

met Jeroboam on the road
Jeroboam was an official under King Solomon, known for his industrious nature. This meeting on the road signifies a divine appointment, as God often uses seemingly ordinary circumstances to reveal His will. The road symbolizes a journey or transition, both physically for Jeroboam and metaphorically for the nation of Israel.

as he was going out of Jerusalem
Jerusalem, the political and spiritual center of Israel, represents the established order under Solomon. Jeroboam's departure from the city foreshadows his future role in leading the northern tribes away from the Davidic rule centered in Jerusalem. This movement away from the city is symbolic of the impending division.

Now Ahijah had wrapped himself in a new cloak
The new cloak represents something fresh or unspoiled, symbolizing the new beginning for Jeroboam and the northern tribes. In biblical symbolism, garments often represent authority or identity. Ahijah's cloak is a prophetic symbol of the new leadership and kingdom that Jeroboam will assume.

and the two of them were alone in the open field
The setting of an open field suggests a place away from the prying eyes of the court, allowing for a private and significant prophetic encounter. This solitude emphasizes the personal nature of God's call to Jeroboam and the gravity of the message being delivered. The open field can also symbolize a place of decision and revelation, akin to other biblical encounters with God in wilderness or isolated settings.

And Ahijah took hold of the new cloak he was wearing
Ahijah the prophet plays a significant role in the narrative of Israel's division. Prophets often used symbolic actions to convey God's messages, and Ahijah's act here is no exception. The new cloak represents something fresh and unblemished, symbolizing the current state of the united kingdom under Solomon. The use of a new garment may also indicate the newness of the impending change. Prophets in the Old Testament frequently used physical objects to illustrate divine truths, as seen with Jeremiah's linen belt (Jeremiah 13:1-11) and Ezekiel's model of Jerusalem (Ezekiel 4:1-3).

tore it into twelve pieces
The tearing of the cloak into twelve pieces is a prophetic act symbolizing the division of the kingdom of Israel. The number twelve is significant in biblical history, representing the twelve tribes of Israel, which were originally united under Saul, David, and Solomon. This act foreshadows the split into the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah. The tearing of the cloak can be seen as a judgment against Solomon's idolatry and disobedience, as God had warned of consequences for turning away from Him (1 Kings 11:9-13). This division is a pivotal moment in Israel's history, leading to separate destinies for the two kingdoms. The imagery of tearing is also reminiscent of other biblical instances where garments are torn as a sign of mourning or judgment, such as when the high priest tore his robes in response to Jesus' claim of divinity (Matthew 26:65).

and said to Jeroboam,
Jeroboam was an Ephraimite and a servant of Solomon, who was later appointed as the overseer of the labor force of the house of Joseph. His rise to prominence is significant as it sets the stage for the division of the kingdom. Jeroboam's encounter with the prophet Ahijah marks a pivotal moment in Israel's history, as it foreshadows the division of the united monarchy.

“Take ten pieces for yourself,
This phrase refers to the symbolic act performed by the prophet Ahijah, who tore a new garment into twelve pieces and gave ten to Jeroboam. The ten pieces represent the ten tribes of Israel that Jeroboam would rule. This act of tearing is symbolic of the impending division of the kingdom, a common prophetic action to convey God's message (cf. 1 Samuel 15:27-28).

for this is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says:
The phrase emphasizes the divine authority behind the message. The LORD, the covenant God of Israel, is the one orchestrating these events. This underscores the theological theme that God is sovereign over the affairs of nations and rulers, and His purposes will prevail despite human actions.

‘Behold, I will tear the kingdom out of the hand of Solomon,
The tearing of the kingdom is a direct consequence of Solomon's disobedience and idolatry, as he turned away from God by worshiping other deities (1 Kings 11:4-8). This act of tearing signifies judgment and the fulfillment of God's warning to Solomon that his kingdom would be divided due to his unfaithfulness (1 Kings 11:11-13).

and I will give you ten tribes.
The ten tribes represent the majority of the Israelite nation, which would form the northern kingdom of Israel under Jeroboam's rule. This division fulfills God's promise to David that his lineage would continue, but also serves as a judgment on Solomon's house. The two remaining tribes, Judah and Benjamin, would remain under the rule of Solomon's son, Rehoboam, forming the southern kingdom of Judah. This division is a significant turning point in Israel's history, leading to distinct political and religious developments in the northern and southern kingdoms.

But one tribe will remain
This phrase refers to the division of the united kingdom of Israel after Solomon's reign. The "one tribe" that remains is Judah, which, along with Benjamin, forms the Southern Kingdom. This division fulfills the prophecy given to Solomon due to his idolatry and disobedience (1 Kings 11:11-13). The tribe of Judah is significant as it is the lineage through which the Messiah, Jesus Christ, would come (Genesis 49:10).

for the sake of My servant David
God's covenant with David is central to this promise. Despite Solomon's failures, God honors His covenant with David, ensuring that his lineage continues to rule in Jerusalem (2 Samuel 7:12-16). This highlights God's faithfulness and the importance of Davidic lineage in biblical history, ultimately leading to Jesus, who is often referred to as the "Son of David" (Matthew 1:1).

and for the sake of Jerusalem
Jerusalem holds a special place in God's plan as the chosen city for His temple and the center of worship for Israel (2 Chronicles 6:6). It is a city of great historical and spiritual significance, often symbolizing God's presence among His people. The preservation of Jerusalem underscores its role in biblical prophecy and eschatology, as it is central to future events described in Revelation.

the city I have chosen
God's choice of Jerusalem as His dwelling place is a recurring theme in Scripture (Psalm 132:13-14). This divine selection emphasizes the city's spiritual importance and its role as the focal point of God's covenant with Israel. Jerusalem is not only a historical and political center but also a spiritual one, representing God's enduring relationship with His people.

out of all the tribes of Israel
This phrase underscores the unique status of Jerusalem and the tribe of Judah among the twelve tribes of Israel. Despite the division of the kingdom, God's promise to David and His choice of Jerusalem remain steadfast. This selection is a testament to God's sovereign will and His plan for redemption through the lineage of David, culminating in the coming of Christ.

For they have forsaken Me
This phrase indicates a turning away from God, a theme prevalent throughout the Old Testament. Forsaking God often led to dire consequences for Israel, as seen in the cycles of sin and redemption in the Book of Judges. This forsaking is a breach of the covenant relationship established at Sinai, where God declared Himself to be the God of Israel, and they were to be His people.

to worship Ashtoreth the goddess of the Sidonians
Ashtoreth, also known as Astarte or Ishtar, was a prominent deity in the ancient Near East, associated with love and war. The Sidonians were a Phoenician people, and their worship practices often included rituals that were abhorrent to the Israelites, such as temple prostitution. The worship of Ashtoreth represents a direct violation of the first commandment, which prohibits the worship of other gods.

Chemosh the god of the Moabites
Chemosh was the national deity of the Moabites, a people often in conflict with Israel. The worship of Chemosh included practices such as child sacrifice, which were strictly forbidden in Israelite law. The Moabites' worship of Chemosh is mentioned in other biblical texts, such as 2 Kings 3:27, where the king of Moab sacrifices his son to gain favor in battle.

and Milcom the god of the Ammonites
Milcom, also known as Molech, was worshiped by the Ammonites, another neighboring nation of Israel. Like Chemosh, the worship of Milcom involved detestable practices, including child sacrifice. The presence of Milcom worship in Israel is a sign of the deep spiritual decline during Solomon's reign, as he allowed foreign influences to corrupt the worship of Yahweh.

They have not walked in My ways
Walking in God's ways is a metaphor for living according to His commandments and statutes. This phrase underscores the importance of obedience in the covenant relationship. The failure to walk in God's ways often led to judgment and exile, as seen in the later history of Israel and Judah.

nor done what is right in My eyes
This phrase emphasizes the moral and ethical standards set by God. Doing what is right in God's eyes is a recurring theme in the Deuteronomic history, which includes the books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings. It contrasts human judgment with divine standards, highlighting the need for alignment with God's will.

nor kept My statutes and judgments
Statutes and judgments refer to the specific laws and decrees given by God to Israel. Keeping these was essential for maintaining the covenant relationship. The failure to keep God's statutes and judgments often resulted in divine discipline, as outlined in Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28.

as Solomon’s father David did
David is often held as the standard for righteous kingship in Israel, despite his own failings. His heart was devoted to God, and he sought forgiveness when he sinned. David's example is frequently cited in the books of Kings and Chronicles as the benchmark for evaluating the kings of Israel and Judah. Solomon's failure to emulate his father's devotion marks a significant turning point in Israel's history.

Nevertheless, I will not take the whole kingdom out of Solomon’s hand
This phrase indicates God's mercy and partial judgment. Despite Solomon's idolatry and disobedience, God chooses not to completely remove the kingdom from him. This reflects God's covenant faithfulness and His commitment to His promises, even when His people fail. It also highlights the theme of divine patience and the opportunity for repentance.

because I have made him ruler all the days of his life
God's decision to allow Solomon to remain king for his lifetime underscores the divine sovereignty in appointing leaders. It also reflects the stability and continuity of leadership that God provides, even when human leaders falter. This can be seen as a fulfillment of God's promise to David regarding his lineage, ensuring that Solomon's reign would not be abruptly ended.

for the sake of David My servant
David is frequently referred to as "My servant," emphasizing his special relationship with God. This phrase highlights the enduring impact of David's faithfulness and the covenant God made with him. It serves as a reminder of the blessings that can extend to future generations due to the faithfulness of one individual. David's legacy is a central theme throughout the Old Testament, and his heart for God sets a standard for future kings.

whom I chose
God's choice of David is a testament to divine election and grace. David was chosen not because of his outward appearance or status, but because of his heart. This choice is a recurring theme in Scripture, where God often selects unlikely individuals to fulfill His purposes, demonstrating that His ways are higher than human understanding.

because he kept My commandments and statutes
David's obedience is highlighted as the reason for God's continued favor upon his lineage. While David was not without sin, his overall life was marked by a commitment to God's laws and a heart of repentance. This phrase underscores the importance of obedience to God's commandments as a basis for blessing and favor. It also serves as a contrast to Solomon's later disobedience, which ultimately led to the division of the kingdom.

But I will take ten tribes of the kingdom
This phrase refers to the division of the united monarchy of Israel. The kingdom, under Solomon, was at its peak in terms of wealth and influence. However, due to Solomon's idolatry and turning away from God, a judgment was pronounced. The ten tribes represent the majority of the tribes of Israel, excluding Judah and Benjamin. This division fulfilled the prophecy given to Ahijah the Shilonite, who tore his new cloak into twelve pieces, symbolizing the division of the kingdom (1 Kings 11:29-31).

from the hand of his son
Solomon's son, Rehoboam, was set to inherit the kingdom. However, due to Solomon's disobedience, the kingdom would not remain intact under his lineage. This reflects the biblical principle that the sins of the father can have consequences for the children (Exodus 20:5). Rehoboam's harsh policies and lack of wisdom further contributed to the division (1 Kings 12:13-14).

and give them to you.
This is directed to Jeroboam, the son of Nebat, who was an official under Solomon. God chose Jeroboam to rule over the ten tribes as a result of Solomon's failure to keep God's covenant. Jeroboam's rise to power was part of God's sovereign plan, despite his later failures in leading the northern kingdom into idolatry (1 Kings 12:26-33). This transfer of power illustrates God's control over the nations and His ability to raise leaders according to His purposes (Daniel 2:21).

I will give one tribe to his son
This phrase refers to God's decision to preserve a portion of the kingdom for the lineage of David, despite Solomon's disobedience. The "one tribe" is often understood to be Judah, which remained loyal to the house of David. This decision highlights God's faithfulness to His covenant with David, as seen in 2 Samuel 7:12-16, where God promises David that his kingdom will endure forever. The preservation of one tribe ensures the continuation of David's line, ultimately leading to the birth of Jesus Christ, who is often referred to as the "Son of David" (Matthew 1:1).

so that My servant David will always have a lamp before Me
The metaphor of a "lamp" signifies the enduring presence and legacy of David's dynasty. In ancient Near Eastern culture, a lamp symbolized life, guidance, and continuity. This promise of a "lamp" is reiterated in 2 Kings 8:19, where it is stated that the Lord was unwilling to destroy Judah for the sake of David, His servant, as He had promised to maintain a lamp for David and his descendants. This imagery also foreshadows the coming of Christ, the Light of the World (John 8:12), who fulfills the Davidic covenant.

in Jerusalem
Jerusalem holds significant theological and historical importance as the city chosen by God for His temple and the center of worship for Israel. It is the city where David established his capital and where Solomon built the temple. Jerusalem is often seen as a symbol of God's presence among His people and is central to biblical prophecy, including its role in the end times (Zechariah 14:4). The city's selection underscores God's sovereign choice and His plan for redemption through the lineage of David.

the city where I chose to put My Name
This phrase emphasizes God's divine selection of Jerusalem as the spiritual center for His people. In Deuteronomy 12:5, God instructs the Israelites to seek the place He will choose to put His Name, which is ultimately revealed as Jerusalem. The concept of God's Name being placed in a location signifies His presence, authority, and blessing. This choice is not only about geographical preference but also about establishing a place where God's covenant with Israel is manifested and where His glory dwells, as seen in the dedication of Solomon's temple (1 Kings 8:10-11).

But as for you, I will take you
This phrase indicates a divine selection and calling. In the context of 1 Kings 11, God is speaking to Jeroboam through the prophet Ahijah. Jeroboam, a servant of Solomon, is chosen by God to lead a portion of the divided kingdom. This divine intervention is reminiscent of God's calling of other leaders in Israel's history, such as Moses (Exodus 3:10) and David (1 Samuel 16:12). It underscores the theme of God's sovereignty in appointing leaders according to His purposes.

and you shall reign over all that your heart desires
This promise suggests that Jeroboam's reign will fulfill his ambitions and desires. It reflects the biblical principle that God often grants leadership to those whose hearts align with His purposes, though it also serves as a cautionary note about the potential for personal ambition to lead to downfall, as seen later in Jeroboam's reign (1 Kings 12:26-33). The phrase can be compared to God's promise to David, where God acknowledges the desires of a leader's heart (Psalm 37:4).

and you will be king over Israel
This statement confirms Jeroboam's future role as king over the northern tribes of Israel. Historically, this marks the division of the united monarchy after Solomon's reign, leading to the separate kingdoms of Israel (the northern kingdom) and Judah (the southern kingdom). Theologically, it highlights the consequences of Solomon's idolatry and disobedience (1 Kings 11:9-13). This division fulfills the prophecy given earlier in the chapter and sets the stage for the complex history of the divided kingdoms. The phrase also foreshadows the ultimate reunification under a future king, seen as a type of Christ, who will reign over a united people of God (Ezekiel 37:22-24).

If you listen to all that I command you
This phrase emphasizes the importance of obedience to God's commands. In the biblical context, listening implies not just hearing but also acting upon God's instructions. This is a recurring theme throughout Scripture, where obedience is linked to blessings (Deuteronomy 28:1-2). The call to listen is a reminder of the covenant relationship between God and His people, where adherence to His commands is a sign of faithfulness.

walk in My ways
Walking in God's ways refers to living a life that aligns with His will and character. This phrase suggests a lifestyle of righteousness and integrity, echoing the call to holiness found in Leviticus 19:2. It implies a continuous, active pursuit of God's path, contrasting with the ways of the world. Walking in God's ways is a theme that runs throughout the Bible, highlighting the journey of faith and the moral and ethical standards expected of believers.

and do what is right in My sight
This phrase underscores the importance of divine perspective over human judgment. What is right in God's sight may differ from societal norms or personal desires. It calls for a life that seeks to please God above all else, reminiscent of the call to be God-pleasers rather than man-pleasers (Galatians 1:10). This aligns with the biblical principle that God's ways and thoughts are higher than ours (Isaiah 55:8-9).

in order to keep My statutes and commandments
The statutes and commandments refer to the laws given by God, particularly those found in the Torah. Keeping these laws was central to the covenant relationship between God and Israel. This phrase highlights the continuity of God's law and its relevance for guiding moral and spiritual conduct. It reflects the biblical understanding that God's commandments are not burdensome but are given for the well-being of His people (1 John 5:3).

as My servant David did
David is often portrayed as a model of faithfulness, despite his imperfections. This reference to David serves as a benchmark for obedience and devotion to God. David's heart for God and his repentance when he sinned (Psalm 51) exemplify the kind of relationship God desires with His people. This phrase also connects to the Davidic covenant, where God promised to establish David's throne forever (2 Samuel 7:16), foreshadowing the coming of Jesus Christ, the Son of David.

then I will be with you
God's presence is a promise of guidance, protection, and blessing. This assurance of divine presence is a recurring promise in Scripture, seen in God's words to Joshua (Joshua 1:9) and echoed in Jesus' promise to be with His disciples always (Matthew 28:20). The presence of God signifies favor and support, essential for fulfilling His purposes.

I will build you a lasting dynasty
The promise of a lasting dynasty echoes the covenant made with David, suggesting a continuation of God's plan through a new leader. This promise is contingent upon obedience and faithfulness, highlighting the conditional nature of God's blessings. The concept of a dynasty also points to the Messianic hope, where Jesus, the ultimate fulfillment of the Davidic line, establishes an eternal kingdom (Luke 1:32-33).

just as I built for David
This comparison to David's dynasty reinforces the legitimacy and significance of the promise. David's reign is seen as a golden age in Israel's history, marked by God's favor and the establishment of Jerusalem as the spiritual and political center. The reference to David serves as a reminder of God's faithfulness to His promises and His ability to fulfill them.

and I will give Israel to you
This promise of giving Israel signifies the transfer of leadership and the responsibility to govern God's people. It reflects the biblical theme of stewardship, where leaders are entrusted with the care and guidance of the nation. The promise also underscores God's sovereignty in appointing leaders and His ultimate control over the destiny of nations.

Because of this,
This phrase refers to the preceding context where Solomon's heart turned away from God due to his foreign wives and idolatry. It highlights the cause-and-effect relationship between disobedience and divine discipline. The "this" is Solomon's failure to keep God's covenant and statutes, which is a recurring theme in the Old Testament, emphasizing the importance of faithfulness to God's commands.

I will humble David’s descendants—
The humbling of David's descendants refers to the division of the kingdom after Solomon's reign. Historically, this occurred when the ten northern tribes broke away to form the kingdom of Israel, leaving only Judah and Benjamin under the rule of Solomon's son, Rehoboam. This humbling is a direct consequence of Solomon's actions, yet it also fulfills God's promise to David that his lineage would continue, albeit in a diminished capacity. This humbling serves as a reminder of the conditional nature of God's promises based on obedience.

but not forever.’”
This phrase offers a glimmer of hope and points to God's enduring mercy and faithfulness to His covenant with David. It foreshadows the eventual restoration and fulfillment of God's promises through Jesus Christ, a descendant of David, who establishes an eternal kingdom. This assurance aligns with prophecies such as those found in Isaiah 9:7 and Jeremiah 33:17, which speak of the everlasting nature of David's throne. The "not forever" indicates that while there will be a period of judgment and humbling, it is not the end of God's plan for David's line.

Solomon therefore sought to kill Jeroboam.
This phrase highlights the tension between Solomon and Jeroboam. Solomon, despite his wisdom, was not immune to the political threats posed by Jeroboam, whom God had chosen to rule over ten tribes of Israel (1 Kings 11:31). This reflects the fulfillment of the prophecy given by the prophet Ahijah, indicating the division of the kingdom due to Solomon's idolatry (1 Kings 11:29-39). The attempt on Jeroboam's life underscores Solomon's departure from God's ways, as he sought to secure his kingdom through human means rather than divine guidance.

But Jeroboam arose and fled to Egypt,
Jeroboam's flight to Egypt is significant as Egypt was often a place of refuge for those fleeing danger in Israel (e.g., Moses in Exodus 2:15). This action demonstrates Jeroboam's awareness of the threat to his life and his strategic decision to seek asylum. Egypt, at this time, was a powerful nation and a natural choice for political asylum. Jeroboam's escape also aligns with God's plan, as it preserved him for his future role as king over the northern tribes.

to Shishak king of Egypt,
Shishak, also known as Sheshonq I, was the first ruler of Egypt's 22nd Dynasty. His reign is historically significant, as he later invaded Judah during the reign of Rehoboam, Solomon's son (1 Kings 14:25-26). Shishak's willingness to harbor Jeroboam suggests a political alliance or at least a mutual interest in destabilizing Solomon's rule. This connection between Jeroboam and Shishak foreshadows future interactions between Egypt and the divided kingdoms of Israel and Judah.

where he remained until the death of Solomon.
Jeroboam's stay in Egypt until Solomon's death indicates a period of waiting and preparation. This time allowed Jeroboam to avoid conflict with Solomon and possibly gain support from Shishak. The death of Solomon marked a turning point, as it led to the fulfillment of God's promise to Jeroboam regarding the division of the kingdom. This period of waiting can be seen as a type of preparation, similar to how Jesus spent time in Egypt as a child (Matthew 2:13-15), both returning to fulfill their respective roles in God's plan.

As for the rest of the acts of Solomon
This phrase introduces the idea that Solomon's reign was filled with numerous events and accomplishments beyond what is recorded in the biblical text. Solomon, the son of David, was the third king of Israel and is known for his wisdom, wealth, and building projects, including the construction of the First Temple in Jerusalem. His reign marked a period of peace and prosperity for Israel, but it also included political alliances through marriages and the eventual introduction of idolatry, which led to his downfall.

all that he did
Solomon's actions included significant political, economic, and religious undertakings. He expanded Israel's borders, established trade routes, and accumulated wealth. His administrative skills were evident in the organization of the kingdom into districts and the establishment of a standing army. However, his later years were marked by turning away from God, influenced by his foreign wives, which led to the worship of other gods and ultimately the division of the kingdom after his death.

as well as his wisdom
Solomon's wisdom is legendary, granted to him by God in response to his request for an understanding heart to govern the people. This wisdom is exemplified in his judicial decisions, such as the famous case of the two women claiming to be the mother of a child. Solomon's wisdom also extended to his writings, including Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and the Song of Solomon, which are part of the biblical canon and continue to be studied for their insights into human nature and divine truth.

are they not written in the Book of the Acts of Solomon?
This rhetorical question suggests the existence of an external source that recorded Solomon's deeds, which is not part of the biblical canon. The "Book of the Acts of Solomon" is considered a lost work, possibly a royal annal or historical record kept during his reign. This mention highlights the practice of documenting royal histories in the ancient Near East, similar to the annals of other kings in the region. The absence of this book in the biblical text underscores the selective nature of the biblical narrative, focusing on theological and moral lessons rather than exhaustive historical accounts.

Thus the time that Solomon reigned
Solomon's reign is a significant period in Israel's history, marked by peace, prosperity, and the construction of the First Temple. His reign is often seen as the zenith of Israel's united monarchy. Solomon's wisdom and wealth were renowned, and his rule is frequently referenced in biblical literature as a time of great achievement and divine favor. However, his later years were marred by idolatry and political alliances that led to spiritual decline.

in Jerusalem
Jerusalem was the political and spiritual center of Israel during Solomon's reign. It was here that Solomon built the Temple, which became the focal point of Jewish worship. The city holds a central place in biblical history, serving as the capital of the united kingdom under David and Solomon. Archaeological evidence supports the existence of a significant urban center in Jerusalem during this period, aligning with biblical accounts.

over all Israel
Solomon's rule extended over the entire nation of Israel, which included the twelve tribes. This unity was a continuation of the consolidation achieved by his father, David. The phrase "over all Israel" emphasizes the extent of Solomon's authority and the unity of the nation during his reign. This unity would later fracture after Solomon's death, leading to the division into the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah.

was forty years
The duration of Solomon's reign, forty years, is symbolic in biblical literature, often representing a period of testing, trial, or completeness. This time frame is consistent with the reigns of other significant biblical figures, such as David and Saul, who also reigned for forty years. The number forty is frequently used in the Bible to denote a generation or a significant period of time, underscoring the completeness and significance of Solomon's rule.

And Solomon rested with his fathers
This phrase indicates Solomon's death, using a common biblical euphemism for dying. "Rested with his fathers" suggests a peaceful passing and continuity with his ancestors. It reflects the belief in an afterlife and the hope of being gathered with one's forebears. This phrase is used throughout the Old Testament to denote the death of the kings of Israel and Judah, emphasizing the continuity of the Davidic line despite human failings.

and was buried in the city of his father David.
Solomon was buried in Jerusalem, the city of David, which was the political and spiritual center of Israel. This burial location underscores the importance of Jerusalem as the city chosen by God for His temple and the seat of the Davidic dynasty. Archaeological evidence supports Jerusalem's significance during this period, though Solomon's specific burial site remains unidentified. The burial in the city of David also highlights the fulfillment of God's promise to David regarding his descendants.

And his son Rehoboam reigned in his place.
Rehoboam's succession marks the continuation of the Davidic line, a central theme in the biblical narrative. However, Rehoboam's reign is immediately marked by division, as the kingdom splits into Israel and Judah due to his harsh policies (1 Kings 12). This division fulfills the prophecy given to Solomon about the kingdom being torn from his son due to Solomon's idolatry (1 Kings 11:11-13). Rehoboam's reign serves as a reminder of the consequences of turning away from God's commandments, contrasting with the ideal kingship that points to Jesus Christ, the ultimate fulfillment of the Davidic covenant.