Now the sons of the prophets said to Elisha
The "sons of the prophets" refers to a group of prophetic disciples or a school of prophets. These groups were common during the time of Elijah and Elisha, serving as training centers for those called to prophetic ministry. Elisha, as the successor of Elijah, was a prominent leader and mentor to these prophets. This phrase highlights the communal and educational aspect of prophetic ministry in ancient Israel, where mentorship and learning were integral. The presence of such schools indicates a structured approach to maintaining and passing on the prophetic tradition.

Please take note that the place where we meet with you
The phrase suggests a regular gathering place for instruction and fellowship, indicating the importance of community and shared learning in the prophetic tradition. This location, likely a simple structure or open area, served as a hub for spiritual growth and guidance under Elisha's leadership. The request to "take note" implies respect and deference to Elisha's authority, acknowledging his role as a spiritual leader. This setting reflects the communal nature of ancient Israelite society, where learning and worship were often conducted in group settings.

is too small for us.
The statement about the space being "too small" indicates growth in the number of prophetic disciples, suggesting a successful ministry under Elisha's guidance. This growth can be seen as a sign of God's blessing and the increasing influence of the prophetic movement during this period. The need for a larger meeting place underscores the dynamic and expanding nature of the prophetic community, as well as the practical challenges of accommodating a growing group. This situation parallels other biblical instances where physical expansion is necessary due to divine blessing, such as the growth of the early church in Acts.

Please let us go to the Jordan
The Jordan River is a significant geographical and spiritual landmark in the Bible. It served as a boundary for the Promised Land and was the site of many important biblical events, such as the crossing by the Israelites under Joshua (Joshua 3:14-17) and the baptism of Jesus (Matthew 3:13-17). The request to go to the Jordan indicates a desire to be near a place of historical and spiritual significance, possibly reflecting a yearning for divine presence and blessing.

where each of us can get a log
The mention of logs suggests a communal effort in gathering resources for construction. In ancient Israel, wood was a valuable commodity, often sourced from areas like Lebanon. The act of each person getting a log emphasizes personal responsibility and contribution to the community's needs, reflecting the biblical principle of working together for a common purpose (Ecclesiastes 4:9-12).

so we can build ourselves a place to live there.
This phrase indicates a need for expansion and growth, likely due to the increasing number of prophets or students under Elisha's mentorship. Building a place to live suggests a desire for stability and permanence, which is a recurring theme in Scripture as God's people seek to establish themselves in the land He has given them (Deuteronomy 12:10). It also reflects the importance of community and fellowship among believers.

“Go,” said Elisha.
Elisha's response is one of approval and encouragement. As a prophet and leader, his consent signifies divine endorsement of the plan. Elisha's role as a type of Christ is evident here, as he guides and supports his followers, much like Jesus does with His disciples. This approval can be seen as a parallel to Jesus' Great Commission, where He sends His followers out with His blessing and authority (Matthew 28:18-20).

Then one of them said,
This phrase introduces a request made by one of the sons of the prophets. The "sons of the prophets" were groups of prophetic disciples or communities that existed during the time of Elijah and Elisha. They were dedicated to learning and living out the prophetic ministry. This setting reflects a time when prophetic activity was prominent in Israel, serving as a counter to the prevalent idolatry and apostasy. The request indicates a sense of respect and dependence on Elisha's leadership and guidance.

“Please come with your servants.”
The request for Elisha to accompany them underscores the importance of his presence and leadership. In the ancient Near Eastern context, a leader's presence was often seen as a source of blessing and protection. This reflects the cultural understanding of authority and mentorship, where the presence of a respected leader could ensure success and divine favor. The term "servants" here indicates humility and a willingness to serve, recognizing Elisha's role as a spiritual leader.

“I will come,” he replied.
Elisha's willingness to accompany them demonstrates his commitment to his disciples and his role as a mentor. This response highlights the relational aspect of prophetic ministry, where leaders were actively involved in the lives of their followers. It also reflects the biblical theme of God's presence with His people, as Elisha's presence symbolizes divine guidance and support. This can be seen as a type of Christ, who promises to be with His followers always, as seen in Matthew 28:20. Elisha's readiness to join them also emphasizes the importance of community and shared mission in the life of faith.

So Elisha went with them
Elisha, the prophet and successor of Elijah, is known for his close relationship with the sons of the prophets, a group of prophetic disciples. His willingness to accompany them demonstrates his role as a mentor and leader. This reflects the biblical principle of spiritual guidance and discipleship, as seen in other mentor-mentee relationships like Moses and Joshua or Paul and Timothy. Elisha's presence signifies divine approval and guidance, emphasizing the importance of godly leadership.

and when they came to the Jordan
The Jordan River holds significant biblical importance, serving as a boundary and a place of miraculous events. It was the site where the Israelites crossed into the Promised Land (Joshua 3) and where Jesus was baptized (Matthew 3:13-17). The Jordan symbolizes transition and transformation, marking a place where God often intervenes in the lives of His people. This setting underscores the theme of divine provision and miraculous occurrences associated with Elisha's ministry.

they began to cut down some trees
The act of cutting down trees indicates preparation and construction, likely for expanding the living quarters of the sons of the prophets. This practical task highlights the communal and industrious nature of the prophetic community. It also reflects the biblical theme of stewardship and resourcefulness, as seen in the building of the tabernacle (Exodus 35) and Solomon's temple (1 Kings 5). The physical labor involved suggests a cooperative effort, emphasizing unity and shared purpose among God's people.

As one of them was cutting down a tree
This phrase sets the scene during a time when the sons of the prophets were expanding their living quarters by the Jordan River. The act of cutting down trees indicates a communal effort and a practical task, reflecting the simplicity and industriousness of the prophetic community. The sons of the prophets were a group of disciples or followers of prophets like Elisha, who were dedicated to learning and living out God's word. This setting emphasizes the importance of community and shared labor in the service of God.

the iron axe head fell into the water
Iron was a valuable and relatively rare material in ancient Israel, making the loss of an iron axe head significant. The Jordan River, where this incident occurred, was a central geographical feature in Israel, often associated with miraculous events (e.g., Joshua 3:14-17, 2 Kings 2:8). The loss of the axe head in the water symbolizes a sudden and unexpected problem, highlighting human limitations and the need for divine intervention. This event foreshadows the miraculous recovery that follows, demonstrating God's concern for even the small, practical needs of His people.

“Oh, my master,” he cried out
The cry to "my master" indicates the presence of Elisha, the leader and mentor of the prophetic community. This appeal to Elisha reflects the respect and dependence the sons of the prophets had on their leader, who was seen as a mediator of God's power and wisdom. The urgency and distress in the cry underscore the seriousness of the situation, as the loss of the axe head could halt their work and bring shame or financial burden due to its value.

“it was borrowed!”
The fact that the axe head was borrowed adds a layer of responsibility and urgency to the situation. In ancient Israel, borrowing items was common, and losing a borrowed item could damage one's reputation and relationships. This detail highlights the ethical and communal values of the time, where personal integrity and responsibility were paramount. The borrowed nature of the axe head also underscores the theme of stewardship and accountability, reminding believers of the importance of caring for what is entrusted to them. This incident can be seen as a type of Christ's redemptive work, where He restores what is lost and pays the debt we cannot pay ourselves.

"Where did it fall?" asked the man of God.
The "man of God" refers to the prophet Elisha, a prominent figure in the Northern Kingdom of Israel during the 9th century BC. Elisha succeeded Elijah and performed many miracles, demonstrating God's power and presence among His people. The question "Where did it fall?" indicates Elisha's concern and readiness to address the problem. This reflects the personal nature of God's care, as He is attentive to the needs of His people, even in seemingly small matters. The context here is a group of prophets expanding their living quarters, and the loss of the borrowed axe head would have been a significant problem due to the value of iron at the time.

And when he showed him the place,
The act of showing the exact location where the axe head fell into the water signifies the importance of acknowledging our problems and bringing them before God. This mirrors the biblical principle of confession and seeking divine intervention. The prophets' community was likely near the Jordan River, a significant geographical and spiritual site in Israel's history, symbolizing transition and divine acts, such as the crossing by Joshua and the baptism of Jesus.

the man of God cut a stick,
Elisha's action of cutting a stick may seem simple, but it is a symbolic gesture. In biblical narratives, wood often represents humanity and the cross. This act can be seen as a precursor to the miraculous, where God uses ordinary means to achieve extraordinary results. The use of a stick also connects to other biblical events where God used simple objects to perform miracles, such as Moses' staff.

threw it there,
The act of throwing the stick into the water is an act of faith and obedience. It demonstrates the principle that God often requires a step of faith before He acts. This mirrors other biblical instances where faith precedes the miracle, such as Naaman washing in the Jordan or the Israelites marching around Jericho.

and made the iron float.
The miracle of the iron axe head floating defies natural laws, showcasing God's sovereignty over creation. Iron, being heavy, naturally sinks, but here it rises, symbolizing resurrection and restoration. This event prefigures the power of Christ, who defies death and brings life. It also serves as a reminder of God's ability to recover what is lost, paralleling the parables of the lost sheep and coin in the New Testament. This miracle reinforces the theme of divine provision and care, emphasizing that nothing is too difficult for God.

“Lift it out,” he said,
This phrase is spoken by the prophet Elisha, who is performing a miracle by causing an iron axe head to float on water. The command to "lift it out" demonstrates Elisha's authority and the power of God working through him. In the biblical context, prophets often acted as intermediaries between God and the people, and their words carried divine authority. This miracle is a testament to God's concern for the everyday needs of His people, as the axe head was borrowed and valuable. The act of lifting it out signifies human participation in God's miraculous provision, emphasizing the cooperation between divine power and human action.

and the man reached out his hand
The man referred to here is one of the sons of the prophets, a group of men who were being trained under Elisha. This action of reaching out his hand signifies faith and obedience. In biblical narratives, physical actions often symbolize spiritual truths. The man's willingness to reach out demonstrates trust in the prophet's words and, by extension, in God's power. This mirrors other biblical instances where faith is demonstrated through action, such as Peter walking on water (Matthew 14:29) or the woman with the issue of blood reaching out to touch Jesus' garment (Mark 5:27-28).

and took it.
The act of taking the axe head completes the miracle and restores what was lost. This can be seen as a metaphor for restoration and redemption, themes prevalent throughout the Bible. The recovery of the axe head can be likened to the restoration of what is lost through sin, with God providing a means for recovery. This also prefigures the redemptive work of Jesus Christ, who restores humanity to God. The simplicity of the act—reaching out and taking—parallels the simplicity of receiving God's grace through faith. This narrative underscores the importance of human response to divine initiative, a recurring theme in Scripture.

Now the king of Aram was at war against Israel.
The king of Aram, also known as Syria, was frequently in conflict with Israel during this period. Aram was a powerful kingdom located to the northeast of Israel, with its capital in Damascus. The ongoing hostilities between Aram and Israel reflect the turbulent political landscape of the ancient Near East, where regional powers often vied for control and influence. This conflict is part of a series of skirmishes and wars that are documented throughout the books of Kings, highlighting the persistent threat Aram posed to Israel. Theologically, these conflicts can be seen as part of the divine testing and judgment upon Israel, as they often strayed from their covenant with God.

After consulting with his servants,
The king's consultation with his servants indicates a strategic military planning session. In ancient Near Eastern cultures, kings often relied on their advisors and military commanders to devise plans and strategies. This phrase suggests a level of organization and intent behind Aram's military actions. It also reflects the hierarchical structure of ancient kingdoms, where decisions were made by the king in consultation with trusted officials. This practice is seen throughout the Old Testament, where kings often seek counsel from their advisors, prophets, or wise men.

he said, “My camp will be in such and such a place.”
The phrase "such and such a place" implies a specific location that is not disclosed in the text, possibly for narrative purposes. This secrecy highlights the tactical nature of the king's plans, as military camps were often set up in strategic locations to launch attacks or defend against enemies. The use of unspecified locations in biblical narratives can also serve to focus the reader's attention on the unfolding events rather than the geographical details. In the broader biblical context, God often reveals the plans of Israel's enemies to His prophets, as seen in the subsequent verses where Elisha, the prophet, warns the king of Israel about Aram's movements. This divine intervention underscores the theme of God's sovereignty and protection over Israel, even amidst their disobedience.

Then the man of God sent word to the king of Israel:
The "man of God" refers to the prophet Elisha, who succeeded Elijah as a major prophet in Israel. Prophets were often intermediaries between God and the people, delivering divine messages. Elisha's role here underscores the importance of prophetic guidance in Israel's history. The king of Israel at this time was likely Jehoram, son of Ahab, who reigned during a period of frequent conflict with neighboring nations. This phrase highlights the divine protection and insight provided to Israel through God's prophets, a recurring theme in the Old Testament.

Be careful not to pass by this place:
This warning indicates a specific location that was strategically significant. The phrase suggests a divine revelation of military intelligence, showcasing God's omniscience and care for His people. The warning implies a potential ambush or danger, emphasizing the need for vigilance and obedience to divine instruction. This reflects the broader biblical theme of God guiding and protecting His people when they heed His warnings.

For the Arameans are going down there:
The Arameans, also known as Syrians, were frequent adversaries of Israel. Their capital was Damascus, and they often engaged in military campaigns against Israel. This phrase indicates a planned movement or attack by the Arameans, revealing the geopolitical tensions of the time. The Arameans' presence in the region is well-documented in both biblical and extrabiblical sources, such as Assyrian records. This situation illustrates the constant threat Israel faced from surrounding nations and the need for divine intervention. The prophetic insight given to Elisha serves as a reminder of God's sovereignty over nations and His ability to thwart the plans of Israel's enemies.

So the king of Israel sent word to the place the man of God had pointed out.
The "king of Israel" during this time was likely Jehoram, son of Ahab, who reigned in the northern kingdom. The "man of God" refers to Elisha, a prophet who succeeded Elijah and was known for his miraculous works and divine insight. Elisha's role as a prophet was to communicate God's will and guidance to the people and their leaders. The phrase indicates a direct communication between the prophet and the king, highlighting the importance of prophetic guidance in Israel's military and political strategies. This reflects the broader biblical theme of God using prophets to direct and protect His people. The "place" mentioned would have been a strategic location where the Arameans, led by King Ben-Hadad, planned to ambush the Israelites. This demonstrates the ongoing conflict between Israel and Aram, a common theme in the historical books of the Old Testament.

Time and again Elisha warned the king,
Elisha's repeated warnings to the king underscore his role as a vigilant and faithful servant of God, who consistently provided divine insight to protect Israel. This persistence in warning the king illustrates the patience and dedication of God's prophets, as well as God's mercy in giving Israel multiple opportunities to avoid disaster. The phrase "time and again" suggests a pattern of divine intervention, emphasizing God's active involvement in the affairs of His people. This also reflects the biblical principle that God often uses His prophets to deliver messages of warning and guidance, as seen in other instances such as Nathan's confrontation with David (2 Samuel 12) and Jonah's warning to Nineveh (Jonah 3).

so that he was on his guard in such places.
The king's response to Elisha's warnings by being "on his guard" indicates a level of trust and reliance on the prophet's words. This vigilance helped protect Israel from the Aramean threats, showcasing the practical benefits of heeding divine counsel. The phrase highlights the importance of obedience to God's guidance for the safety and success of His people. It also reflects the broader biblical theme of God as a protector and defender of Israel, as seen in passages like Psalm 121:4, which speaks of God watching over Israel. The strategic military context here is significant, as it demonstrates how spiritual insight can have tangible effects on national security and leadership.

For this reason the king of Aram became enraged
The king of Aram, likely Ben-Hadad II, was frustrated because his military plans against Israel were being thwarted. This anger reflects the tension between Aram (modern-day Syria) and Israel during this period. The Arameans were a constant threat to Israel, often engaging in border skirmishes and larger conflicts. The king's rage indicates the seriousness of the situation, as his plans were being consistently revealed, undermining his authority and military strategy.

and called his servants to demand of them
The king's servants would have been his trusted advisors and military officers. In ancient Near Eastern courts, such individuals were expected to be loyal and provide counsel. The king's summoning of his servants suggests a crisis of trust and a need to identify the source of the intelligence leak. This reflects the hierarchical structure of ancient monarchies, where the king relied heavily on his inner circle for governance and military operations.

“Tell me, which one of us is on the side of the king of Israel?”
The king's question implies suspicion of espionage or betrayal within his ranks. This reflects the common practice of espionage in ancient warfare, where intelligence was crucial for military success. The phrase "on the side of the king of Israel" suggests a perceived internal threat, highlighting the paranoia and mistrust that can arise in times of conflict. This situation parallels other biblical narratives where internal betrayal is a theme, such as Judas' betrayal of Jesus (Matthew 26:14-16). The king's inability to understand that the prophet Elisha was revealing his plans to the king of Israel underscores the spiritual dimension of the conflict, where divine intervention plays a key role, as seen throughout the biblical narrative.

But one of his servants replied
This phrase introduces a servant of the king of Aram, who is responding to the king's frustration over his military plans being thwarted. The servant's role highlights the presence of informants or advisors in royal courts, a common practice in ancient Near Eastern cultures. This setting underscores the tension between Aram and Israel during this period.

“No one, my lord the king.
The servant assures the king that there is no traitor among them. This reflects the loyalty expected in royal courts and the high stakes of espionage and intelligence in ancient warfare. The phrase "my lord the king" shows the servant's respect and submission to the king's authority, a common cultural practice in addressing royalty.

For Elisha, the prophet in Israel,
Elisha is identified as a prophet, a significant figure in Israel who succeeded Elijah. Prophets in Israel were seen as God's mouthpieces, often involved in political and military matters. Elisha's role as a prophet is crucial, as he is depicted as having divine insight, which is a recurring theme in his ministry. His presence in Israel signifies God's ongoing communication and intervention in the nation's affairs.

tells the king of Israel
This indicates that Elisha has a direct line of communication with the king of Israel, likely Jehoram at this time. The relationship between prophets and kings in Israel was complex, often involving guidance, rebuke, and support. Elisha's ability to inform the king of Aram's plans demonstrates the divine favor and protection over Israel, as well as the prophet's influence in political matters.

the very words you speak in your bedroom.”
This hyperbolic expression emphasizes Elisha's prophetic insight, suggesting that nothing is hidden from him, even the most private conversations. It underscores the belief in God's omniscience and the power of prophecy. The mention of the "bedroom" symbolizes the most intimate and secretive of settings, highlighting the extent of divine revelation. This phrase also serves as a reminder of God's sovereignty and the futility of opposing His will, as seen in other biblical narratives where God reveals hidden things to His prophets (e.g., Daniel 2:22).

So the king said,
This refers to the king of Aram, likely Ben-Hadad II, who was at war with Israel. His frustration with Elisha's prophetic insight into his military plans led him to take direct action. This reflects the common practice of ancient kings to personally direct military and strategic operations.

“Go and see where he is,
The king's command to locate Elisha indicates the importance of intelligence and reconnaissance in ancient warfare. It also highlights the perceived threat Elisha posed due to his prophetic abilities, which were seen as a divine advantage for Israel.

that I may send men to capture him.”
The intent to capture Elisha shows the king's misunderstanding of the source of Elisha's power. This mirrors other biblical narratives where human leaders attempt to thwart divine plans, such as Pharaoh's pursuit of the Israelites (Exodus 14). It also foreshadows the futility of opposing God's anointed servants.

On receiving the report,
This suggests a network of informants or spies, common in ancient Near Eastern politics. The king's reliance on such a network underscores the strategic importance of intelligence in maintaining power and control.

“Elisha is in Dothan,”
Dothan is a significant location, mentioned earlier in Genesis 37:17 as the place where Joseph was sold into slavery by his brothers. It is situated in the northern part of the central hill country of Israel. The mention of Dothan connects Elisha's story to the broader narrative of God's providence and protection over His chosen people, as seen in Joseph's life.

the king of Aram sent horses, chariots, and a great army
This phrase highlights the military might and determination of the king of Aram, also known as Syria. The Arameans were a significant power in the region during this period, often in conflict with Israel. Horses and chariots were symbols of military strength and technological advancement in ancient warfare, indicating the seriousness of the threat. This action reflects the king's desperation to capture Elisha, who had been revealing his military plans to the king of Israel (2 Kings 6:8-12). The deployment of a "great army" underscores the perceived threat Elisha posed to Aram, emphasizing the spiritual warfare theme where physical might is pitted against divine insight.

They went there by night
The decision to move by night suggests a strategic attempt to surprise and capture Elisha without alerting the city. Nighttime operations were risky but could provide a tactical advantage, reflecting the urgency and secrecy of the mission. Biblically, night often symbolizes danger or evil (John 3:19-20), contrasting with the light of God's presence and protection. This setting foreshadows the miraculous intervention that follows, where God's power is revealed in the face of human schemes.

and surrounded the city
The city in question is Dothan, a small town in the northern kingdom of Israel. Its mention connects to earlier biblical narratives, such as Joseph's story (Genesis 37:17), where Dothan is also a place of divine intervention. The act of surrounding the city indicates a siege, a common military tactic to cut off supplies and force surrender. This situation sets the stage for God's deliverance, as seen in the subsequent verses where Elisha's servant's eyes are opened to see the heavenly army (2 Kings 6:17). The surrounding of the city by enemy forces serves as a metaphor for the spiritual battles believers face, where God's unseen protection is always present.

When the servant of the man of God got up and went out early in the morning
This phrase sets the scene for a significant event in the life of Elisha, the prophet. The "servant of the man of God" refers to Elisha's attendant, who is unnamed in this passage. The early morning timing suggests a routine start to the day, yet it quickly turns into a moment of crisis. In biblical times, early morning was often a time for prayer and preparation, indicating the servant's diligence. This moment parallels other biblical instances where God reveals His plans or protection in the morning, such as the provision of manna for the Israelites (Exodus 16:21).

behold, an army with horses and chariots had surrounded the city
The presence of an army with horses and chariots indicates a formidable military force, typical of ancient Near Eastern warfare. Horses and chariots were symbols of power and might, often used by nations like Egypt and Assyria. The city referred to is Dothan, a location mentioned earlier in 2 Kings 6:13. Dothan was strategically significant, situated on a trade route, making it a target for military action. This scenario reflects the ongoing conflict between Israel and Aram (Syria), highlighting the political and military tensions of the time.

So he asked Elisha, “Oh, my master, what are we to do?”
The servant's question to Elisha reveals his fear and uncertainty in the face of overwhelming odds. Addressing Elisha as "my master" shows respect and recognition of Elisha's authority and spiritual insight. This moment of crisis prompts a reliance on divine guidance, a common theme in Scripture where human limitations are met with God's intervention. The servant's reaction is reminiscent of other biblical figures who faced daunting challenges, such as Moses at the Red Sea (Exodus 14:10-12) or the disciples during the storm (Mark 4:38). This phrase sets the stage for Elisha's demonstration of faith and the subsequent revelation of God's protection.

“Do not be afraid,”
This phrase is a common biblical exhortation, appearing frequently throughout Scripture as a reassurance from God or His messengers. It reflects a divine command to trust in God's sovereignty and protection. In the context of 2 Kings 6, Elisha speaks these words to his servant, who is terrified by the sight of the Aramean army surrounding them. This echoes similar assurances given to figures like Joshua (Joshua 1:9) and Mary (Luke 1:30), emphasizing faith over fear.

Elisha answered,
Elisha, the prophet and successor of Elijah, is a central figure in the narrative of 2 Kings. Known for his miracles and deep relationship with God, Elisha's response is rooted in his spiritual insight and confidence in God's power. His role as a prophet is to convey God's messages and demonstrate His power, often through miraculous acts. Elisha's life and ministry are a testament to God's ongoing work through His chosen servants.

“for those who are with us are more than those who are with them.”
This statement reveals a spiritual reality unseen by the physical eye. Elisha refers to the heavenly host, God's angelic army, which outnumbers the physical forces of the Arameans. This concept is supported by other biblical passages, such as Psalm 34:7, which speaks of the angel of the Lord encamping around those who fear Him. Theologically, this underscores the theme of divine protection and the presence of God's unseen forces in spiritual warfare. It also prefigures the New Testament assurance found in Romans 8:31, "If God is for us, who can be against us?" This phrase encourages believers to trust in God's omnipotence and the reality of His spiritual support, even when circumstances seem dire.

Then Elisha prayed
Elisha, the prophet and successor of Elijah, is known for his powerful prayer life. His prayers often resulted in miraculous events, demonstrating his close relationship with God. This phrase highlights the importance of prayer as a means of divine intervention and guidance. Elisha's reliance on prayer is a model for believers, emphasizing the power of intercession.

“O LORD, please open his eyes that he may see.”
Elisha's request for the young man's eyes to be opened is both literal and spiritual. In the biblical context, seeing often symbolizes understanding or perceiving spiritual truths. This prayer reflects the need for spiritual insight to recognize God's presence and protection. It parallels other biblical instances where God opens eyes, such as in Psalm 119:18, where the psalmist asks for understanding of God's law.

And the LORD opened the eyes of the young man,
This divine action signifies God's response to prayer and His willingness to reveal spiritual realities to those who seek Him. The opening of the young man's eyes is a supernatural event, illustrating God's power to transcend human limitations. It serves as a reminder that spiritual insight is a gift from God, not achieved through human effort alone.

and he saw that the hills were full of horses and chariots of fire
The imagery of horses and chariots of fire is reminiscent of the divine chariot that took Elijah to heaven (2 Kings 2:11). This vision represents God's heavenly army, symbolizing His protection and sovereignty. The presence of these fiery chariots underscores the theme of divine warfare, where God fights on behalf of His people, as seen in other scriptures like Psalm 34:7, which speaks of the angel of the LORD encamping around those who fear Him.

all around Elisha.
The protection surrounding Elisha signifies God's favor and the special role of prophets as His messengers. This scene reassures believers of God's omnipresence and His ability to protect His servants. It also foreshadows the New Testament promise of spiritual protection for believers, as seen in passages like Romans 8:31, which declares that if God is for us, who can be against us?

As the Arameans came down against him
The Arameans, also known as the Syrians, were frequent adversaries of Israel during the time of the divided kingdom. This phrase sets the scene for a military confrontation. The Arameans were likely coming from the north, as their capital was Damascus. Historically, the Arameans were a powerful group, often clashing with Israel over territory and influence. This context highlights the constant threat Israel faced from surrounding nations, emphasizing the need for divine intervention.

Elisha prayed to the LORD
Elisha, the successor of Elijah, was a prophet known for his miracles and close relationship with God. His immediate response to pray underscores the importance of seeking divine guidance and intervention in times of crisis. This act of prayer reflects a deep trust in God's power and willingness to act on behalf of His people. Elisha's reliance on prayer serves as a model for believers, illustrating the power of prayer in overcoming seemingly insurmountable challenges.

“Please strike these people with blindness.”
Elisha's specific request for blindness is significant. In biblical terms, blindness often symbolizes spiritual ignorance or a lack of understanding. By asking for physical blindness, Elisha is effectively neutralizing the threat without resorting to violence. This request demonstrates the prophet's wisdom and reliance on God's power to protect His people in a non-lethal manner. It also foreshadows the New Testament theme of spiritual blindness and the need for divine revelation to see the truth.

So He struck them with blindness
God's immediate response to Elisha's prayer highlights His sovereignty and willingness to act on behalf of His servants. This divine intervention serves as a testament to God's power and the authority granted to His prophets. The miraculous nature of this event underscores the reality of God's involvement in the affairs of His people and His ability to alter the natural order to fulfill His purposes.

according to the word of Elisha
The phrase emphasizes the authority and prophetic power vested in Elisha. It shows that God honors the words of His prophets, fulfilling their requests when they align with His will. This connection between the prophet's word and God's action is a recurring theme in Scripture, illustrating the close relationship between God and His chosen messengers. It also points to the ultimate fulfillment of God's word through Jesus Christ, the Word made flesh, who has authority over all creation.

And Elisha told them,
Elisha, the prophet and successor of Elijah, is central in this narrative. Known for his miracles and guidance to the kings of Israel, Elisha's role here demonstrates his authority and divine insight. His actions are often seen as prefiguring the works of Christ, who also led people spiritually and physically.

“This is not the way, and this is not the city.
Elisha speaks to the Aramean soldiers who have been struck with blindness. His statement is both literal and metaphorical, as he redirects them from their intended path. This can be seen as a reflection of spiritual blindness and the need for divine guidance, similar to how Jesus redirects those who are spiritually lost.

Follow me,
Elisha's invitation to follow him is reminiscent of Jesus' call to His disciples. It signifies trust and obedience, themes prevalent throughout the Bible. The act of following a prophet or leader is a recurring motif, symbolizing faith and the journey towards truth.

and I will take you to the man you are seeking.”
Elisha promises to lead them to the man they seek, which is himself, though they do not realize it. This mirrors the biblical theme of seeking and finding, as seen in Matthew 7:7. It also highlights the irony and divine humor often present in biblical narratives.

And he led them to Samaria.
Samaria, the capital of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, is significant both politically and spiritually. By leading the Arameans there, Elisha brings them into the heart of Israel, demonstrating God's power and protection over His people. This act foreshadows the inclusive nature of God's kingdom, as seen in the New Testament, where Samaritans are also recipients of Jesus' ministry.

When they had entered Samaria
Samaria was the capital of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, established by King Omri. It was a significant city both politically and militarily. The context here is that the Aramean army, blinded by God at Elisha's request, is led into the heart of Israel's territory. This act demonstrates God's sovereignty and the power of His prophet, Elisha, over the enemies of Israel. The city itself was strategically located on a hill, making it a formidable fortress and a symbol of Israel's strength.

Elisha said, “O LORD, open the eyes of these men that they may see.”
Elisha, a prophet and successor to Elijah, is known for his miracles and deep relationship with God. His request for the opening of the men's eyes is a reversal of the earlier miracle where he asked God to blind them. This phrase highlights the theme of spiritual blindness and sight, a recurring motif in Scripture. It underscores the idea that true sight comes from God, and without divine intervention, people remain spiritually blind. This theme is echoed in the New Testament, where Jesus heals physical and spiritual blindness, pointing to His role as the Light of the World.

Then the LORD opened their eyes, and they looked around and discovered that they were in Samaria.
The opening of the eyes signifies a return to reality and an acknowledgment of God's power. The Arameans' realization that they are in Samaria, surrounded by their enemies, is a moment of vulnerability and divine revelation. This event serves as a reminder of God's protection over Israel and His ability to control the outcomes of human conflicts. It also prefigures the ultimate revelation of God's kingdom, where spiritual blindness will be removed, and all will see the truth of God's sovereignty. The narrative demonstrates God's mercy, as Elisha later spares the lives of the Arameans, reflecting the grace and forgiveness that are central to the Christian message.

And when the king of Israel saw them
The king of Israel at this time is likely Joram (or Jehoram), the son of Ahab. This event occurs during a period of frequent conflict between Israel and Aram (Syria). The Aramean army, which had been blinded and led to Samaria by Elisha, is now in the presence of the king. This moment highlights the tension and uncertainty in the king's response to the unexpected situation. The king's reaction is significant as it reflects the political and military pressures of the time, as well as the influence of prophetic authority in Israel.

he asked Elisha
Elisha, the prophet, holds a position of spiritual authority and influence in Israel. His presence and actions demonstrate the power of God working through His prophets. The king's consultation with Elisha indicates a recognition of the prophet's role as a mediator of God's will. This interaction underscores the importance of seeking divine guidance in matters of state and warfare, a theme prevalent throughout the Old Testament.

“My father, shall I kill them? Shall I kill them?”
The term "my father" is a respectful address, acknowledging Elisha's spiritual authority and wisdom. The repetition of the question "Shall I kill them?" emphasizes the king's eagerness or anxiety to act decisively against the captured Arameans. This reflects the cultural and historical context of ancient Near Eastern warfare, where captured enemies were often executed. However, the king's deference to Elisha suggests an awareness of the moral and ethical implications of such an action, as well as the potential for divine instruction to guide his decision. This moment foreshadows the unexpected mercy that Elisha will instruct, aligning with biblical themes of grace and the transformative power of God's intervention.

“Do not kill them,” he replied.
This phrase reflects a command of mercy and restraint. In the context of ancient warfare, captured enemies were often killed or enslaved. The prophet Elisha's directive to spare the Aramean soldiers highlights a principle of compassion and forgiveness. This mirrors God's mercy towards humanity, as seen in passages like Matthew 5:44, where Jesus instructs to love enemies and pray for persecutors.

“Would you kill those you have captured with your own sword or bow?”
Elisha challenges the king of Israel to consider the ethics of killing prisoners of war. This rhetorical question underscores the idea that these captives were not taken by the king's might but by divine intervention. It emphasizes reliance on God's power rather than human strength, similar to David's reliance on God against Goliath (1 Samuel 17:47).

Set food and water before them,
Providing sustenance to enemies is an act of grace and hospitality, countercultural to the norms of retribution. This act prefigures the teachings of Jesus, who fed multitudes and taught about the Bread of Life (John 6:35). It also reflects the biblical principle of overcoming evil with good (Romans 12:20-21).

that they may eat and drink
The act of eating and drinking together in the ancient Near East was a sign of peace and covenant. By allowing the Arameans to eat and drink, Elisha initiates a gesture of reconciliation. This can be seen as a type of the Lord's Supper, where believers partake in communion as a sign of peace with God and each other (1 Corinthians 11:23-26).

and then return to their master.”
Releasing the captives to return to their master demonstrates trust in God's sovereignty and justice. It reflects the biblical theme of returning good for evil and trusting God to handle the outcomes. This act of sending them back unharmed could have served as a testimony to the Arameans of the power and mercy of Israel's God, similar to how God used Israel to be a light to the nations (Isaiah 49:6).

So the king prepared a great feast for them
In the ancient Near East, sharing a meal was a significant act of hospitality and reconciliation. The king of Israel's decision to prepare a feast for the Aramean soldiers, who were previously enemies, reflects a profound act of mercy and grace. This act can be seen as a foreshadowing of the New Testament teaching to love one's enemies (Matthew 5:44). The feast symbolizes a covenant of peace, reminiscent of the peace offerings in Leviticus 3.

and after they had finished eating and drinking
The completion of the meal signifies the fulfillment of the king's gesture of goodwill. In biblical times, eating and drinking together often sealed agreements and covenants. This act of sharing a meal can be compared to the Last Supper, where Jesus shared bread and wine with His disciples, symbolizing the new covenant (Luke 22:19-20).

he sent them away
Sending the Aramean soldiers away unharmed demonstrates a strategic and compassionate approach to conflict resolution. This action aligns with the biblical principle of overcoming evil with good (Romans 12:21). It also reflects the wisdom of Proverbs 25:21-22, which advises feeding one's enemy and offering them drink, thereby heaping burning coals on their head, a metaphor for inducing shame and repentance.

and they returned to their master
The return of the soldiers to their master, the king of Aram, signifies the restoration of order and the cessation of hostilities. This return can be seen as a type of repentance or turning back, which is a recurring theme in the Bible. It also highlights the sovereignty of God in orchestrating peace between nations, as seen in Proverbs 21:1, where the king's heart is in the hand of the Lord.

And the Aramean raiders did not come into the land of Israel again
This outcome underscores the effectiveness of the king's merciful actions. The cessation of raids can be viewed as a divine intervention, where God grants peace to Israel as a result of their obedience and faithfulness. This mirrors the promise of protection and peace found in Leviticus 26:6, where God assures Israel of safety if they follow His statutes. The peace achieved here is a temporary glimpse of the ultimate peace that will be established in the Messianic kingdom, as prophesied in Isaiah 2:4.

Some time later
This phrase indicates a passage of time since the previous events in the narrative. It suggests a period of relative peace or normalcy before the new conflict arises. In the broader context of 2 Kings, this time lapse follows the miraculous events involving Elisha, such as the floating axe head and the blinding of the Aramean army. The phrase sets the stage for a new chapter in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Aram.

Ben-hadad king of Aram
Ben-hadad was a common name for Aramean kings, similar to the use of "Pharaoh" in Egypt. This particular Ben-hadad is likely the son of Hazael, who was anointed by Elijah to be king over Aram (1 Kings 19:15). The Arameans were a significant power in the region, often in conflict with Israel. Historically, the Arameans were known for their military prowess and strategic alliances, which they used to exert influence over neighboring territories.

assembled his entire army
The gathering of the entire army indicates a significant military campaign, suggesting that Ben-hadad was committed to a decisive action against Israel. This mobilization reflects the seriousness of the threat to Samaria and the resources that Aram was willing to invest in this siege. In ancient warfare, assembling an entire army was a demonstration of strength and intent to conquer.

and marched up to besiege Samaria
Samaria was the capital of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, established by King Omri (1 Kings 16:24). The city's strategic location on a hill made it a formidable fortress, but also a prime target for enemies. A siege was a common military tactic in ancient times, involving surrounding a city to cut off supplies and force surrender. This siege is part of the ongoing hostilities between Israel and Aram, highlighting the political and military tensions of the period. The siege of Samaria is reminiscent of other biblical sieges, such as the Assyrian siege of Jerusalem (2 Kings 18-19), and foreshadows the eventual fall of Samaria to the Assyrians in 722 BC (2 Kings 17:5-6).

So there was a great famine in Samaria.
The famine in Samaria was a result of the Aramean siege, a common military tactic in ancient times where a city was surrounded to cut off supplies and force surrender. Samaria, the capital of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, was strategically significant and often targeted by enemies. Famines were seen as divine judgment in the biblical narrative, often linked to the people's disobedience to God (Deuteronomy 28:52-53). This famine underscores the severity of the siege and the desperation of the people.

Indeed, they besieged the city so long
The prolonged siege indicates the determination of the Arameans to conquer Samaria. Historically, sieges could last months or even years, leading to dire conditions within the city walls. The endurance of the siege reflects the political and military tensions between Israel and Aram (modern-day Syria), a recurring theme in the books of Kings.

that a donkey’s head sold for eighty shekels of silver,
The mention of a donkey's head, an unclean animal according to Levitical law (Leviticus 11:3-8), highlights the extreme scarcity of food. The exorbitant price of eighty shekels of silver, a significant sum, illustrates the desperation and inflation caused by the siege. This situation is reminiscent of other biblical accounts of famine, such as the one in 2 Kings 7:1-2, where Elisha prophesies relief from famine.

and a quarter cab of dove’s dung sold for five shekels of silver.
Dove's dung, possibly a term for a type of seed or a literal reference to bird droppings, was sold at a high price, indicating the severe lack of food. The use of such items for sustenance reflects the dire conditions and the lengths to which people would go to survive. This phrase emphasizes the desperation and degradation experienced during the siege, serving as a backdrop for the miraculous deliverance that follows in the narrative.

As the king of Israel was passing by on the wall
This phrase sets the scene during a time of great distress in Samaria, the capital of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. The king mentioned here is likely King Jehoram (also known as Joram), son of Ahab. The city was under siege by the Arameans, leading to severe famine. The wall signifies the city's defense, and the king's presence there indicates his concern for the city's security and morale. Historically, city walls were crucial for protection, and leaders often inspected them during sieges. This reflects the dire situation and the king's active involvement in the crisis.

a woman cried out to him
The woman's cry highlights the desperation and suffering of the people during the siege. In ancient Near Eastern cultures, women were often the most vulnerable during times of war and famine. Her cry is a poignant reminder of the human cost of conflict and the king's responsibility to his people. This moment echoes other biblical instances where individuals cry out to leaders or God in times of distress, such as the Israelites in Egypt (Exodus 2:23).

“Help me, my lord the king!”
The plea for help underscores the king's role as a judge and protector of his people. In theocratic Israel, the king was seen as God's representative, responsible for justice and welfare. The woman's address, "my lord the king," shows respect and acknowledges his authority. This plea can be compared to other biblical cries for deliverance, such as the psalmist's appeals to God for help (Psalm 121:1-2). It also foreshadows the ultimate deliverance found in Jesus Christ, who is often called upon for help and salvation in the New Testament (e.g., Matthew 15:25).

He answered, “If the LORD does not help you,
This phrase reflects the dire situation in Samaria during the siege by the Arameans. The king of Israel, likely Joram, acknowledges the limitations of human power and the necessity of divine intervention. This echoes the biblical theme that true deliverance comes from God alone, as seen in Psalms 121:1-2, where the psalmist looks to the Lord for help. The king's response also highlights a moment of desperation and recognition of human insufficiency, a recurring theme throughout the Old Testament.

where can I find help for you?
The rhetorical question underscores the helplessness of the king and the people. It suggests that without God's intervention, no earthly resource or strategy can provide salvation. This sentiment is mirrored in other biblical narratives, such as the plight of the Israelites in Egypt, where only God's power could deliver them from bondage (Exodus 14:13-14). The king's question also serves as a reminder of the covenant relationship between God and Israel, where reliance on God is paramount.

From the threshing floor or the winepress?”
Threshing floors and winepresses were symbols of agricultural abundance and prosperity in ancient Israel. However, during the siege, these places would be empty, symbolizing the famine and lack of resources. The mention of these locations highlights the severity of the situation, as they were typically associated with harvest and provision. This imagery is used elsewhere in Scripture to depict judgment or blessing, such as in Joel 2:24, where a future restoration is promised with overflowing threshing floors and winepresses. The king's mention of these places emphasizes the futility of seeking help from earthly means when divine intervention is absent.

Then the king asked her, “What is the matter?”
In this passage, the king of Israel, likely King Jehoram, is confronted with the dire situation in Samaria during a severe famine caused by the Aramean siege. The king's inquiry reflects his desperation and helplessness as he walks on the city wall, witnessing the suffering of his people. This moment highlights the role of a king as a shepherd to his people, responsible for their welfare, yet here he is powerless. The king's question also underscores the severity of the famine, as he is approached by a woman with a grievous complaint, indicating the extreme conditions within the city.

And she answered, “This woman said to me, ‘Give up your son, that we may eat him,
The woman's response reveals the horrific reality of the famine, where the situation has become so desperate that cannibalism is considered. This echoes the curses outlined in Deuteronomy 28:53-57, where disobedience to God would lead to such dire circumstances. The moral and social breakdown is evident, as the natural affection of a mother for her child is overridden by the instinct for survival. This phrase also serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of turning away from God, as the Israelites had done by worshipping other gods and neglecting the covenant.

and tomorrow we will eat my son.’”
The agreement between the two women to eat their children on successive days illustrates the depth of despair and the collapse of societal norms. This situation is reminiscent of the siege of Jerusalem in Lamentations 4:10, where similar acts of desperation occurred. The mention of "tomorrow" suggests a false hope or a temporary solution to their immediate hunger, highlighting the futility of their actions. This phrase can also be seen as a type of the ultimate sacrifice, contrasting with the selfless sacrifice of Jesus Christ, who gave Himself willingly for the salvation of others, in stark contrast to the selfish and desperate actions depicted here.

So we boiled my son and ate him
This phrase is a stark depiction of the dire circumstances during the siege of Samaria by the Arameans. The famine was so severe that it led to acts of cannibalism, which were considered abominable and a sign of extreme desperation. This event fulfills the warnings given in Leviticus 26:29 and Deuteronomy 28:53, where God warned Israel that disobedience would lead to such dire consequences. The act of boiling and eating a child underscores the depth of the crisis and the moral and spiritual decay that had befallen the people. It also serves as a grim reminder of the consequences of turning away from God.

and the next day I said to her, ‘Give up your son, that we may eat him.’
This part of the narrative highlights the broken trust and the collapse of social and familial bonds during the siege. The agreement between the two women to eat their children on successive days shows the extent of their desperation. It also reflects the fulfillment of prophetic warnings about the horrors that would befall a disobedient nation. The request to "give up your son" is a tragic echo of the earlier agreement, emphasizing the hopelessness and moral confusion that had overtaken the city.

But she had hidden her son.”
The woman's decision to hide her son reveals a glimmer of maternal instinct and the innate desire to protect one's offspring, even in the face of starvation. This act of hiding her son can be seen as a desperate attempt to preserve life amidst death. It also introduces a moment of conflict and betrayal, as the initial agreement is broken. This situation illustrates the breakdown of societal norms and the extreme measures people resort to in times of crisis. The narrative serves as a powerful illustration of the consequences of sin and the need for repentance and reliance on God.

When the king heard the words of the woman
This phrase refers to King Jehoram of Israel during a time of severe famine in Samaria, caused by the Aramean siege. The woman's words, which are detailed earlier in the chapter, reveal the desperate conditions, including cannibalism. This reflects the fulfillment of the curses for disobedience found in Deuteronomy 28:53-57, where such dire circumstances are predicted as a consequence of turning away from God.

he tore his clothes
Tearing one's clothes is a traditional expression of grief, distress, or repentance in ancient Israelite culture. This act signifies the king's deep anguish and helplessness in the face of the dire situation. It is a public display of mourning, similar to other biblical instances such as Job 1:20 and 2 Samuel 13:19.

And as he passed by on the wall
The wall of Samaria was a place of defense and oversight, where the king could survey the city and its dire conditions. This setting emphasizes the public nature of the king's actions and the visibility of his distress to the people. The wall also symbolizes the city's isolation and vulnerability during the siege.

the people saw the sackcloth under his clothes next to his skin
Sackcloth is a coarse material traditionally worn as a sign of mourning or repentance. The fact that the king wore sackcloth under his royal garments indicates a personal acknowledgment of the need for repentance, though it is hidden from public view. This act can be seen as a superficial gesture, as his heart may not have been truly repentant, reflecting the broader spiritual state of Israel. Sackcloth is often associated with humility and seeking God's mercy, as seen in Jonah 3:5-6 and Isaiah 58:5.

He announced
This phrase indicates a public declaration, likely made by King Jehoram of Israel. In the context of ancient Israel, such announcements were often made in moments of crisis or decision. The king's role as a leader required him to address the people, especially during times of distress, such as the famine in Samaria.

“May God punish me, and ever so severely,
This is a common oath formula in the Old Testament, reflecting the seriousness of the speaker's intent. It invokes divine retribution as a guarantee of the speaker's commitment to their words. This type of oath is seen elsewhere in Scripture, such as in Ruth 1:17, where Ruth makes a similar vow to Naomi. It underscores the gravity of the situation and the king's desperation.

if the head of Elisha son of Shaphat
Elisha, the prophet, was the successor of Elijah and a prominent figure in the Northern Kingdom of Israel. His role as a prophet was to convey God's messages, often challenging the king and the people to return to faithfulness. The mention of "the head" signifies a threat of execution, a common practice for dealing with perceived enemies or traitors. Elisha's father, Shaphat, is mentioned to identify him clearly, as was customary in genealogical references.

remains on his shoulders
This phrase is a vivid expression of the king's intent to execute Elisha. It reflects the cultural and historical practice of beheading as a form of capital punishment. The king's anger towards Elisha likely stems from frustration over the ongoing famine and the belief that the prophet, as God's representative, should have intervened.

through this day!”
The urgency in the king's words indicates a critical moment, possibly due to the dire circumstances of the siege of Samaria by the Arameans. The phrase "through this day" suggests an immediate timeframe, highlighting the king's desperation and impulsive decision-making. This reflects the broader biblical theme of human impatience and the tendency to blame God's messengers during times of crisis.

Now Elisha was sitting in his house, and the elders were sitting with him.
Elisha, the prophet, is depicted as being in a position of authority and respect, as he is in the company of the elders. This setting indicates a time of counsel or deliberation, possibly due to the dire circumstances in Samaria, which was under siege by the Arameans. The presence of the elders suggests that Elisha was not only a spiritual leader but also a key advisor in political and social matters. This reflects the role of prophets in Israel as both spiritual and civic leaders. The house setting may symbolize a place of refuge and divine insight amidst the chaos outside.

The king sent a messenger ahead, but before he arrived, Elisha said to the elders,
The king of Israel, likely Jehoram, sends a messenger, indicating a sense of urgency or desperation. The fact that Elisha knows of the messenger's approach before his arrival demonstrates his prophetic insight, a gift from God. This foreknowledge underscores Elisha's role as a true prophet, in contrast to false prophets who lacked such divine revelation. It also highlights the tension between the king and Elisha, as the king often vacillated between seeking God's counsel and relying on his own understanding.

“Do you see how this murderer has sent someone to cut off my head?
Elisha refers to the king as "this murderer," which may allude to the king's responsibility for the dire situation in Samaria, possibly due to his failure to follow God's commands or his involvement in idolatry. The threat to Elisha's life indicates the king's frustration and misplaced blame for the siege and famine. This accusation reflects the broader biblical theme of the persecution of God's prophets by those in power, as seen in the lives of other prophets like Jeremiah and John the Baptist.

Look, when the messenger comes, shut the door to keep him out.
Elisha instructs the elders to shut the door, a practical measure to protect himself from the king's wrath. This action symbolizes the rejection of the king's authority in favor of divine protection and guidance. The closed door can also be seen as a metaphor for the separation between God's will and human attempts to thwart it. This echoes other biblical instances where God provides protection for His servants, such as Noah's ark or the Passover in Egypt.

Is not the sound of his master’s footsteps behind him?”
Elisha discerns that the king himself is following the messenger, indicating the king's personal involvement and urgency in the matter. This phrase suggests that the king is not only sending a message but is also actively pursuing his own agenda, possibly to confront or capture Elisha. The footsteps imply impending judgment or confrontation, reminiscent of other biblical narratives where footsteps signify approaching danger or divine intervention, such as God's presence in the Garden of Eden.

While Elisha was still speaking with them
Elisha, the prophet, was in conversation with the elders of Israel. This setting highlights the role of prophets as intermediaries between God and His people. Elisha's presence signifies divine guidance during a time of crisis, as the city of Samaria was under siege by the Arameans. Prophets often provided counsel and direction, as seen throughout the Old Testament, such as with Samuel and David.

the messenger came down to him
The messenger was sent by the king of Israel, likely Jehoram, during a desperate time. The phrase "came down" suggests urgency and the physical descent from the palace to where Elisha was. Messengers in biblical times were crucial for communication, especially during sieges when direct access was limited. This reflects the king's desperation and the critical nature of the situation.

And the king said
The king's direct involvement underscores the severity of the crisis. In ancient Israel, kings were seen as leaders responsible for the welfare of their people, often seeking prophetic insight during national emergencies. This interaction between the king and Elisha is reminiscent of other biblical narratives where kings sought prophetic counsel, such as Hezekiah consulting Isaiah.

“This calamity is from the LORD
The king acknowledges the divine origin of the disaster, recognizing God's sovereignty over national events. This reflects a common biblical theme where God uses calamities to bring about repentance or judgment, as seen in the plagues of Egypt or the Babylonian exile. The king's statement indicates an understanding of God’s control over both blessings and adversities.

Why should I wait for the LORD any longer?”
The king's question reveals his impatience and wavering faith. In times of distress, waiting on the Lord is a recurring biblical exhortation, as seen in Psalms and the prophets. This impatience contrasts with the faith of figures like Job or David, who trusted in God's timing. The king's doubt serves as a cautionary example of the struggle between human impatience and divine timing.