Lexical Summary hostis, hétis, ho ti: whoever, whatever, which, that Original Word: ὅστις, ἥτις, ὅτι Strong's Exhaustive Concordance whoever, whichever, whateverIncluding the feminine hetis (hay'-tis), and the neuter ho,ti (hot'-ee) from hos and tis; which some, i.e. Any that; also (definite) which same -- X and (they), (such) as, (they) that, in that they, what(-soever), whereas ye, (they) which, who(-soever). Compare hoti. see GREEK hos see GREEK tis see GREEK hoti NAS Exhaustive Concordance Word Originfrom hos, and tis Definition whoever, anyone who NASB Translation after (1), because (1), everyone who (1), one who (1), ones who (1), these (2), these...matters which (1), this (3), what (1), whatever things (1), which (29), who (61), whoever (9), whoever* (3), yet (1). Thayer's Greek Lexicon STRONGS NT 3748: ὅστιςὅστις, ἥτις, ὁ, τί (separated by a hypodiastole (comma), to distinguish it from ὅτι; but L T Tr write ὁ τί, without a hypodiastole (cf. Tdf. Prolog., p. 111), leaving a little space between ὁ and τί; (WH ὅτι); cf. Winers Grammar, 46 (45f); (Lipsius, Gramm. Untersuch., p. 118f; WH. Introductory § 411)), genitive ὁυτινος (but of the oblique cases only the accusative neuter ὁ, τί and the genitive ὅτου, in the phrase ἕως ὅτου, are found in the N. T.) (from Homer down), compound of ὅς and τίς, hence, properly, anyone who; i. e.: 1. whoever, everyone who: ὅστις simply, in the singular chiefly at the beginning of a sentence in general propositions, especially in Matt.; with an indicative present, Matthew 13:12 (twice); Mark 8:34 (where L Tr WH εἰ τίς); Luke 14:27; neuter Matthew 18:28 Rec.; with a future, Matthew 5:39 (R G Tr marginal reading), 2. it refers to a single person or thing, but so that regard is had to a general notion or class to which this individual person or thing belongs, and thus it indicates quality: one who, such a one as, of such a nature that (cf. Kühner, § 554 Anm. 1, ii., p. 905; (Jelf, § 816, 5); Lücke on 1 John 1:2, p. 210f): ἡγούμενος, ὅστις ποιμανεῖ, Matthew 2:6; add, Matthew 7:26; Matthew 13:52; Matthew 16:28; Matthew 20:1; Matthew 25:1; Mark 15:7; Luke 2:10; Luke 7:37; Luke 8:3; John 8:25; John 21:25 (Tdf. omits the verse); Acts 11:28; Acts 16:12; Acts 24:1; Romans 11:4; 1 Corinthians 5:1; 1 Corinthians 7:13 (Tdf. εἰ τίς); Galatians 4:24, 26; Galatians 5:19; Philippians 2:20; Colossians 2:23; 2 Timothy 1:5; Hebrews 2:3; Hebrews 8:5; Hebrews 10:11; Hebrews 12:5; James 4:14; 1 John 1:2; Revelation 1:12; Revelation 9:4; Revelation 17:12; ὁ ναός τοῦ Θεοῦ ἅγιος ἐστιν, οἵτινες ἐστε ὑμεῖς (where οἵτινες makes reference to ἅγιος) and such are ye, 1 Corinthians 3:17 (some refer it to ναός). 3. Akin to the last usage is thai whereby it serves to give a reason, such as equivalent to seeing that he, inasmuch as he: Romans 16:12 (here Lachmann brackets the clause); Ephesians 3:13; (Colossians 3:5); Hebrews 8:6; plural, Matthew 7:15; Acts 10:47; Acts 17:11; Romans 1:25, 32; Romans 2:15; Romans 6:2; Romans 9:4; Romans 16:7; 2 Corinthians 8:10; (Philippians 4:3 (where see Lightfoot)); 1 Timothy 1:4; Titus 1:11; 1 Peter 2:11. 4. According to a later Greek usage it is put for the interrogative τίς in direct questions (cf. Lob. ad Phryn., p. 57; Lachmann, larger edition, vol. i., p. xliii; Buttmann, 253 (218); cf. Winer's Grammar, 167 (158)); thus in the N. T. the neuter ὁ, τί stands for τί equivalent to διά τί in Mark 2:16 T Tr WH (cf. 7 WH marginal reading); 5. It differs scarcely at all from the simple relative ὅς (cf. Matthiae, p. 1073; Buttmann, § 127, 18; (Krüger, § 51, 8; Ellicott on Galatians 4:24; cf. Jebb in Vincent and Dickson's Handbook. to Modern Greek, Appendix, § 24); but cf. C. F. A. Fritzsche in Fritzschiorum opuscc., p. 182f, who stoutly denies it): Luke 2:4; Luke 9:30; Acts 17:10; Acts 23:14; Acts 28:18; Ephesians 1:23. 6. ἕως ὅτου, on which see ἕως, II. 1 b. β., p. 268b middle Strong’s Greek 3748 appears in five basic spellings—ὅστις (m-s), ἥτις (f-s), οἵτινες (m-pl), αἵτινες (f-pl), ἅτινα/ὅτινα (n-pl)—and functions as an indefinite relative pronoun. It identifies a class by its quality (“whoever is of the sort that…”) rather than merely pinpointing an individual (“who”). Because it is qualitative, it often signals a principle or timeless truth instead of a single historical fact. Indefinite-Relative Force in Context 1. Matthew 7:24-27; 7:26. In the twin parables of house-building the Lord contrasts ὅστις ἀκούει (“whoever hears”) with ὅστις ἀκούει καὶ μὴ ποιεῖ (“whoever hears and does not do”), establishing an abiding distinction between obedient and disobedient listeners. The Pronoun in the Teaching of Jesus Jesus employs ὅστις especially in ethical instruction and parables (Matthew 5–7; 13; 18; 19; 20; 21; 22; Luke 14–15; 19). Its usage consistently draws a line between two ways of living—wise or foolish builders (Matthew 7:24-27), fruitful or barren hearers (Mark 4:20; Luke 8:15), penitent or impenitent sinners (Luke 15:7). Because the pronoun points to the inherent nature of the participant, the Lord forces the listener to examine personal character rather than external labels. Narrative Usage Luke’s Gospel and Acts frequently use οἵτινες/αἵτινες to identify groups whose shared trait advances the storyline: Such occurrences enrich the narrative by stressing the nature of the group rather than merely listing names. Pauline Letters: Doctrinal Weight Paul leverages the qualitative thrust of 3748 to draw theological contrasts. Petrine and Hebrews Emphases 1 Peter 2:11 addresses believers “who are strangers and exiles,” reminding them of their pilgrim character amid a hostile world. Hebrews often pairs 3748 with sacrificial language (10:8, 10:11) to emphasize the repetitive nature of Levitical offerings in contrast to the once-for-all sacrifice of Christ. Eschatological Attention in Revelation John’s Apocalypse uses οἵτινες to spotlight moral identity in judgment scenes: Historical and Textual Observations 1. In Classical Greek ὅστις carried a conditional flavor (“whoever may be”), but by the Koine era the sense is more definite yet still qualitative. Pastoral and Homiletical Significance Because 3748 marks character, preachers may legitimately generalize its statements as abiding principles. It summons believers to self-assessment (“Am I among those who…?”), encourages assurance (promises given to all of a certain description), and warns against presumption (condemnations likewise address a class). The pronoun therefore serves discipleship by anchoring ethical exhortation in identity. Key Theological Themes Illuminated by 3748 • Identity precedes conduct (Romans 6:2; 1 Peter 2:11). Representative Sample of Occurrences Matthew 25:1; 27:55; Luke 12:1; Acts 17:11; Romans 1:25, 32; 2 Corinthians 9:11; Galatians 4:24, 26; Ephesians 3:13; Colossians 3:5; 1 Timothy 6:9; Hebrews 10:8; 1 John 1:2. Conclusion Strong’s 3748 stands at strategic points throughout the New Testament, marking off those whose defining qualities distinguish them in salvation history. Its consistent usage underlines the Bible’s call to inward transformation and communal identity in Christ, reminding readers that divine promises and warnings alike pertain to “those who” display the corresponding character. Englishman's Concordance Matthew 2:6 RelPro-NMSGRK: ἐξελεύσεται ἡγούμενος ὅστις ποιμανεῖ τὸν NAS: A RULER WHO WILL SHEPHERD KJV: a Governor, that shall rule INT: will go forth a leader who will shepherd the Matthew 5:39 RelPro-NMS Matthew 5:41 RelPro-NMS Matthew 7:15 RelPro-NMP Matthew 7:24 RelPro-NMS Matthew 7:24 RelPro-NMS Matthew 7:26 RelPro-NMS Matthew 10:32 RelPro-NMS Matthew 10:33 RelPro-NMS Matthew 12:50 RelPro-NMS Matthew 13:12 RelPro-NMS Matthew 13:12 RelPro-NMS Matthew 13:52 RelPro-NMS Matthew 16:28 RelPro-NMP Matthew 18:4 RelPro-NMS Matthew 19:12 RelPro-NMP Matthew 19:12 RelPro-NMP Matthew 19:12 RelPro-NMP Matthew 19:29 RelPro-NMS Matthew 20:1 RelPro-NMS Matthew 21:33 RelPro-NMS Matthew 21:41 RelPro-NMP Matthew 22:2 RelPro-NMS Matthew 23:12 RelPro-NMS Matthew 23:12 RelPro-NMS Strong's Greek 3748 |