2 Chronicles 32
Berean Study Bible

Sennacherib Invades Judah

After all these acts of faithfulness
This phrase refers to the reforms and religious revival led by King Hezekiah of Judah. Hezekiah's acts of faithfulness included restoring temple worship, celebrating the Passover, and removing idolatry from the land (2 Chronicles 29-31). These actions were in obedience to God's commands and demonstrated a commitment to the covenant relationship with Yahweh. Despite these acts of faithfulness, Judah still faced external threats, illustrating that faithfulness to God does not exempt one from trials or challenges.

Sennacherib king of Assyria came and invaded Judah
Sennacherib was the king of Assyria from 705 to 681 BC, known for his military campaigns and expansion of the Assyrian Empire. His invasion of Judah occurred around 701 BC. Assyria was the dominant power in the Near East at the time, and Sennacherib's campaign was part of a larger effort to subdue rebellious vassal states. The invasion of Judah was a significant event, as it tested the faith and leadership of Hezekiah. This historical context highlights the geopolitical tensions of the period and the threat posed by Assyria to smaller nations like Judah.

He laid siege to the fortified cities
The fortified cities of Judah were strategically important for defense and control of the region. Archaeological evidence, such as the Lachish reliefs found in Nineveh, depicts the Assyrian siege of Lachish, one of Judah's key fortified cities. Sieges were a common military tactic in the ancient world, involving surrounding a city to cut off supplies and force surrender. The mention of fortified cities underscores the severity of the threat and the military prowess of the Assyrian army.

intending to conquer them for himself
Sennacherib's intention to conquer the fortified cities of Judah reflects the Assyrian policy of expansion and control. Conquering these cities would have extended Assyrian influence and secured valuable resources and strategic locations. This phrase also highlights the personal ambition of Sennacherib, as he sought to expand his empire and assert his dominance. Theologically, this can be seen as a test of Judah's reliance on God versus political and military alliances. The narrative sets the stage for God's deliverance of Jerusalem, demonstrating His sovereignty and power over even the mightiest of earthly kings.

When Hezekiah saw that Sennacherib had come to make war against Jerusalem,
Hezekiah: Hezekiah was the 13th king of Judah, known for his faithfulness to God and his efforts to restore proper worship in the temple. His reign is detailed in 2 Kings 18-20, 2 Chronicles 29-32, and Isaiah 36-39. He is often remembered for his religious reforms and his trust in God during times of crisis.

Sennacherib: Sennacherib was the king of Assyria, one of the most powerful empires of the ancient Near East. His reign is well-documented in Assyrian records, and he is known for his military campaigns and the expansion of the Assyrian empire. The conflict with Hezekiah is also recorded in Assyrian annals, providing a historical context for the biblical narrative.

Had come to make war: This phrase indicates the aggressive intent of Sennacherib against Jerusalem. The Assyrian empire was known for its military prowess and its strategy of siege warfare, which involved surrounding a city to cut off supplies and force surrender. This was a common tactic in ancient warfare and posed a significant threat to the inhabitants of a besieged city.

Against Jerusalem: Jerusalem was the capital of Judah and the spiritual center for the Jewish people, housing the temple built by Solomon. The city's significance is both religious and political, making it a prime target for Sennacherib's campaign. The defense of Jerusalem is a recurring theme in the Old Testament, symbolizing God's protection over His chosen people and city.

Biblical Context: This event is part of a larger narrative that includes God's deliverance of Jerusalem from the Assyrian threat. The story is paralleled in 2 Kings 18-19 and Isaiah 36-37, where Hezekiah's faith and prayer lead to divine intervention. The angel of the Lord strikes down the Assyrian army, demonstrating God's power and faithfulness.

Connections to Other Scripture: The siege of Jerusalem by Sennacherib is a pivotal moment that highlights themes of trust in God and divine deliverance. It echoes earlier biblical accounts, such as the Exodus, where God delivers His people from seemingly insurmountable odds. It also foreshadows the ultimate deliverance through Jesus Christ, who is seen as the fulfillment of God's promises to protect and save His people.

Types of Jesus Christ: Hezekiah's role as a faithful king who seeks God's guidance and protection can be seen as a type of Christ, who is the ultimate King and Deliverer. Just as Hezekiah intercedes for his people and trusts in God's salvation, Jesus intercedes for humanity and provides eternal salvation through His sacrifice. he consulted with his leaders and mighty men
This phrase highlights King Hezekiah's leadership style, emphasizing collaboration and seeking counsel from trusted advisors. In the biblical context, Hezekiah was known for his faithfulness to God and his reforms in Judah (2 Kings 18:5-6). Consulting with leaders and mighty men reflects the wisdom found in Proverbs 15:22, which underscores the importance of seeking advice. The "mighty men" were likely his military commanders, indicating the seriousness of the impending threat from the Assyrian army led by Sennacherib. This approach contrasts with the actions of some other kings who acted independently, often leading to poor decisions.

about stopping up the waters of the springs outside the city
The strategic move to stop the waters was a defensive measure to deprive the Assyrian army of water resources during their siege. This action is supported by archaeological findings, such as the Siloam Tunnel (also known as Hezekiah's Tunnel), which redirected water from the Gihon Spring into the city of Jerusalem. This tunnel is a testament to Hezekiah's foresight and engineering prowess. The act of stopping the springs also symbolizes cutting off the enemy's life source, a tactic seen in other biblical narratives where water plays a crucial role, such as in the Exodus story (Exodus 14:21-22).

and they helped him carry it out
The cooperation of Hezekiah's leaders and mighty men in executing this plan demonstrates unity and shared purpose among the people of Judah. This collective effort is reminiscent of the unity seen in Nehemiah's time when rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 4:6). It also reflects the biblical principle found in Ecclesiastes 4:9-12, which speaks to the strength found in working together. The successful implementation of this plan was crucial in the defense of Jerusalem, showcasing the importance of community and teamwork in overcoming challenges.

Many people assembled
This phrase indicates a collective effort involving a large number of individuals. In the context of ancient Judah, such an assembly would have included not only soldiers but also civilians, reflecting a united front against the Assyrian threat. This unity is reminiscent of other biblical instances where the people of God come together for a common purpose, such as in Nehemiah's rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem.

and stopped up all the springs and the stream that flowed through the land.
The strategic decision to stop up water sources was a common military tactic in ancient times to deprive invading armies of essential resources. Archaeological evidence from the region supports the existence of numerous water systems, including Hezekiah's Tunnel, which was part of the broader effort to secure water for Jerusalem while denying it to the Assyrians. This act of blocking water sources is a demonstration of wisdom and foresight, aligning with Proverbs 21:31, which emphasizes preparation in the face of conflict.

“Why should the kings of Assyria come and find plenty of water?” they said.
This rhetorical question highlights the strategic thinking of King Hezekiah and his advisors. The Assyrian Empire, known for its military prowess and expansionist policies, relied heavily on local resources during campaigns. By denying them water, Judah aimed to weaken the Assyrian forces. This mirrors the broader biblical theme of God providing wisdom to His people to outmaneuver their enemies, as seen in the story of Gideon in Judges 7. The phrase also underscores the importance of resource management and divine guidance in times of crisis, reflecting the belief that God equips His people with the necessary tools to face their adversaries.

Then Hezekiah worked resolutely
Hezekiah's determination reflects his strong leadership and faith in God. His resolve is reminiscent of other biblical figures who acted decisively in times of crisis, such as Nehemiah rebuilding Jerusalem's walls. This phrase highlights the importance of steadfastness and commitment in fulfilling God's purposes.

to rebuild all the broken sections of the wall
The walls of Jerusalem were crucial for the city's defense against invaders. Rebuilding them was not only a practical necessity but also a symbolic act of restoring strength and security. This mirrors the spiritual rebuilding that believers are called to undertake in their lives, repairing what is broken through faith and obedience.

and to raise up towers on it
Towers were strategic for defense, providing vantage points to spot approaching enemies. Spiritually, this can be seen as a call to vigilance and preparedness, echoing the New Testament exhortation to be watchful and stand firm in faith.

He also built an outer wall
The construction of an outer wall indicates a proactive approach to defense, expanding protection beyond the immediate city. This can be likened to the Christian's call to extend their influence and protection through evangelism and community engagement, safeguarding not just themselves but others as well.

and reinforced the supporting terraces of the City of David
The City of David, the oldest part of Jerusalem, held historical and spiritual significance as the original stronghold of King David. Reinforcing its terraces underscores the importance of maintaining and strengthening one's spiritual heritage and foundations, much like the call to uphold the teachings and traditions of the faith.

and he produced an abundance of weapons and shields
Hezekiah's preparation for battle by amassing weapons and shields signifies the necessity of being equipped for spiritual warfare. This parallels the New Testament imagery of the armor of God, emphasizing readiness and protection against spiritual adversaries.

Hezekiah appointed military commanders over the people
Hezekiah's appointment of military commanders reflects his role as a strategic and proactive leader. This action is set against the backdrop of the Assyrian threat under King Sennacherib. Historically, the Assyrian Empire was known for its military prowess and expansionist policies, making Hezekiah's preparations crucial for Judah's defense. The appointment of commanders indicates a structured military hierarchy, which was essential for organizing the defense of Jerusalem. This mirrors the biblical principle of wise leadership and preparation, as seen in Proverbs 21:31, "The horse is made ready for the day of battle, but victory rests with the LORD."

and gathered the people in the square of the city gate
The city gate was a central place in ancient Near Eastern cities, serving as a hub for legal matters, trade, and public gatherings. By gathering the people here, Hezekiah was addressing them in a location that symbolized authority and community. This act of gathering also signifies unity and collective strength, essential for facing the impending siege. The city gate as a place of assembly is seen in other biblical contexts, such as Ruth 4:1, where Boaz goes to the city gate to settle legal matters.

Then he encouraged them, saying,
Hezekiah's encouragement to the people highlights his role as both a military and spiritual leader. In times of crisis, leaders in the Bible often provided encouragement to bolster the faith and morale of their people. This is reminiscent of Moses' words to Joshua in Deuteronomy 31:6, "Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid or terrified because of them, for the LORD your God goes with you." Hezekiah's words would have been intended to inspire confidence in God's protection and to remind the people of their covenant relationship with Him. This encouragement is a precursor to the miraculous deliverance that God would provide, as recorded later in the chapter.

Be strong and courageous!
This exhortation echoes the words given to Joshua (Joshua 1:6-9) as he prepared to lead Israel into the Promised Land. It is a call to trust in God's power and presence, emphasizing reliance on divine strength rather than human might. The phrase is a recurring biblical theme, encouraging believers to face challenges with faith and confidence in God's promises.

Do not be afraid or discouraged
Fear and discouragement are common human responses to overwhelming circumstances. This command reassures the people of Judah that their situation is under divine control. Similar encouragements are found throughout Scripture, such as in Isaiah 41:10, where God promises His presence and support.

before the king of Assyria and the vast army with him
The Assyrian Empire was a dominant military power during this period, known for its brutal conquests and advanced warfare tactics. King Sennacherib's campaign against Judah was part of his broader strategy to expand Assyrian control. The historical context highlights the real and present danger faced by Hezekiah and his people, making the call to faith even more significant.

for there is a greater One with us than with him
This statement affirms the presence and superiority of God over any earthly power. It parallels the assurance given by Elisha in 2 Kings 6:16, where he tells his servant not to fear the Aramean army because "those who are with us are more than those who are with them." This reflects the biblical truth that God's power surpasses all human strength, a theme also seen in Romans 8:31, "If God is for us, who can be against us?" It foreshadows the ultimate victory of Christ over all spiritual adversaries.

With him is only the arm of flesh
This phrase refers to the Assyrian king Sennacherib and his army, emphasizing their reliance on human strength and military might. In biblical context, "the arm of flesh" often symbolizes human power and effort, which is limited and fallible (Jeremiah 17:5). The Assyrians were known for their formidable military capabilities, having conquered many nations. However, this phrase highlights the futility of relying solely on human strength without divine support.

but with us is the LORD our God to help us and to fight our battles.
Hezekiah contrasts the Assyrian reliance on human power with Judah's reliance on divine intervention. The LORD, Yahweh, is depicted as a warrior who fights for His people, a theme seen throughout the Old Testament (Exodus 14:14, Deuteronomy 20:4). This reflects the covenant relationship between God and Israel, where God promises to protect and deliver His people. It also foreshadows the ultimate victory through Christ, who fights spiritual battles on behalf of believers (1 Corinthians 15:57).

So the people were strengthened by the words of Hezekiah king of Judah.
Hezekiah's leadership and faith in God provided encouragement and strength to the people of Judah. His words reflect a deep trust in God's promises and power, which is a recurring theme in the history of Israel's kings. This moment is a testament to the power of faith-filled leadership and the impact of godly encouragement. It also serves as a reminder of the importance of relying on God's strength rather than human abilities, a principle echoed in the New Testament (Philippians 4:13).

Sennacherib Threatens Jerusalem

Later, as Sennacherib king of Assyria and all his forces besieged Lachish
Sennacherib was the king of Assyria from 705 to 681 BC, known for his military campaigns and conquests. Lachish was a significant fortified city in Judah, strategically important due to its location on the main road to Jerusalem. The siege of Lachish is well-documented both biblically and archaeologically, with reliefs found in Sennacherib's palace in Nineveh depicting the siege. This event highlights the Assyrian threat to Judah and sets the stage for the confrontation with Jerusalem.

he sent his servants to Jerusalem with a message
The sending of messengers was a common practice in ancient warfare, often used to intimidate or negotiate. This act demonstrates Sennacherib's confidence and his attempt to undermine the morale of Jerusalem's inhabitants. It reflects the psychological warfare tactics employed by ancient empires to weaken their enemies before a physical assault.

for King Hezekiah of Judah
Hezekiah was the king of Judah from approximately 715 to 686 BC, known for his religious reforms and efforts to centralize worship in Jerusalem. He is portrayed as a faithful king who trusted in the LORD, contrasting with the idolatry of his predecessors. His reign is marked by significant events, including the Assyrian invasion and his miraculous recovery from illness, which are seen as tests of his faith and leadership.

and all the people of Judah who were in Jerusalem
The people of Judah, particularly those in Jerusalem, were under great threat from the Assyrian army. Jerusalem was the capital and spiritual center of Judah, housing the Temple built by Solomon. The city's inhabitants would have been anxious and fearful, facing the possibility of siege and destruction. This phrase underscores the collective experience of the nation during this crisis and sets the stage for Hezekiah's response and reliance on divine intervention.

This is what Sennacherib king of Assyria says:
Sennacherib was the king of Assyria from 705 to 681 BC, known for his military campaigns and conquests. Assyria was a dominant empire in the ancient Near East, often threatening smaller nations like Judah. Sennacherib's invasion of Judah is well-documented both in the Bible and in Assyrian records, such as the Taylor Prism. His communication reflects the arrogance and intimidation tactics typical of Assyrian rulers, who often sought to demoralize their enemies.

What is the basis of your confidence,
This question challenges the faith and trust of the people of Judah. In the context of ancient warfare, confidence often came from military strength, alliances, or fortifications. However, for the people of Judah, their confidence was rooted in their faith in God. This phrase echoes the broader biblical theme of reliance on God rather than human strength, as seen in passages like Psalm 20:7, which contrasts trust in chariots and horses with trust in the name of the Lord.

that you remain in Jerusalem under siege?
Jerusalem was a fortified city, but it was under significant threat from the Assyrian army. The siege was a common military tactic used to cut off supplies and force a city into submission. Historically, the siege of Jerusalem by Sennacherib is a pivotal event, as recorded in 2 Kings 18-19 and Isaiah 36-37. Theologically, this situation tests the faith of the people and their king, Hezekiah, who ultimately seeks divine intervention. The deliverance of Jerusalem from Sennacherib's siege is seen as a miraculous act of God, reinforcing the message that true security comes from divine protection rather than human defenses.

Is not Hezekiah misleading you
This phrase reflects the psychological warfare employed by the Assyrian king, Sennacherib, against the people of Judah. Hezekiah, the king of Judah, was known for his faithfulness to God and his efforts to reform the religious practices of his people, as seen in 2 Kings 18:3-6. The Assyrian king's statement is an attempt to undermine Hezekiah's leadership and the people's trust in him. Historically, Assyria was a dominant military power, and their strategy often included demoralizing their enemies through propaganda.

to give you over to death by famine and thirst
The threat of siege warfare was real, as cities under siege would often face starvation and dehydration. Jerusalem, being a fortified city, was vulnerable to such tactics. The Assyrians had a reputation for their brutal sieges, as evidenced by their conquest of Samaria in 722 BC. The fear of famine and thirst would have been a powerful tool to incite panic among the inhabitants of Jerusalem.

when he says, ‘The LORD our God will deliver us
Hezekiah's faith in God's deliverance is a central theme in this narrative. This statement echoes the promises of divine protection found throughout the Old Testament, such as in Psalm 46:1, which speaks of God as a refuge and strength. Hezekiah's reliance on God contrasts with the Assyrian reliance on military might. This faith is later vindicated when God miraculously delivers Jerusalem, as recorded in 2 Chronicles 32:21.

from the hand of the king of Assyria?’
The king of Assyria, Sennacherib, represents the epitome of earthly power and opposition to God's people. The Assyrian empire was known for its vast military campaigns and conquests. This phrase highlights the tension between earthly kingdoms and the kingdom of God. The deliverance from Assyria can be seen as a type of Christ's ultimate victory over sin and death, as Jesus is often depicted as the deliverer of His people, fulfilling prophecies such as those found in Isaiah 9:6-7.

Did not Hezekiah himself remove His high places and His altars
Hezekiah, the king of Judah, initiated significant religious reforms during his reign, as recorded in 2 Kings 18:4 and 2 Chronicles 31:1. The "high places" were sites of worship often located on elevated ground, where people would offer sacrifices and burn incense, sometimes to Yahweh but often to other gods. These practices were contrary to the centralized worship that God commanded in Deuteronomy 12:2-5. Hezekiah's removal of these high places and altars was a return to the covenantal faithfulness required by the Law of Moses, emphasizing the exclusive worship of Yahweh. This action was a direct challenge to the syncretistic practices that had crept into Judah, reflecting Hezekiah's commitment to purifying the nation's worship.

and say to Judah and Jerusalem,
Hezekiah's reforms were directed towards both Judah, the southern kingdom, and its capital, Jerusalem. This indicates the comprehensive nature of his religious reforms, affecting both the rural areas and the political and spiritual center of the nation. Jerusalem held the temple, the central place of worship, which was to be the focal point of religious life in Israel. By addressing both Judah and Jerusalem, Hezekiah was ensuring that his reforms were implemented throughout the entire kingdom, reinforcing the unity and centralization of worship.

‘You must worship before one altar,
The insistence on worshiping before "one altar" refers to the altar in the temple in Jerusalem, as prescribed in Deuteronomy 12:13-14. This centralization of worship was intended to prevent idolatry and ensure that the worship of Yahweh was conducted according to His commandments. The temple in Jerusalem was the designated place for sacrifices and offerings, symbolizing God's presence among His people. This directive was a move towards religious purity and unity, aligning with the covenantal stipulations given to Israel.

and on it you shall burn sacrifices’?
The burning of sacrifices on the altar in Jerusalem was a key aspect of the sacrificial system established in the Mosaic Law. Sacrifices were a means of atonement, thanksgiving, and worship, pointing to the need for reconciliation with God. This phrase underscores the importance of adhering to the divinely instituted means of worship. In a typological sense, the sacrificial system foreshadows the ultimate sacrifice of Jesus Christ, who offered Himself once for all (Hebrews 10:10). Hezekiah's reforms, therefore, not only restored proper worship but also pointed forward to the fulfillment of the sacrificial system in Christ.

Do you not know what I and my fathers have done to all the peoples of the lands?
This phrase is spoken by Sennacherib, the king of Assyria, during his campaign against Judah. It reflects the Assyrian practice of boasting about their military conquests and instilling fear in their enemies. Historically, Assyria was known for its powerful army and brutal tactics, which included deporting conquered peoples to prevent rebellion. The reference to "my fathers" highlights the continuity of Assyrian dominance, as previous kings had also expanded the empire's territory. This statement is intended to intimidate the people of Judah by reminding them of Assyria's past victories over other nations.

Have the gods of these nations ever been able to deliver their land from my hand?
Sennacherib's rhetorical question challenges the power of the gods worshiped by the nations he has conquered. In the ancient Near East, military success was often seen as a reflection of a nation's gods' power. By claiming that no other gods have been able to save their lands, Sennacherib is asserting the superiority of Assyria and its gods. This statement sets the stage for a theological confrontation, as it questions the ability of the God of Israel to protect Judah. Theologically, this can be seen as a test of faith for the people of Judah, as they are called to trust in the Lord despite the overwhelming threat. This challenge is reminiscent of other biblical narratives where the power of God is demonstrated over false gods, such as Elijah's confrontation with the prophets of Baal in 1 Kings 18.

Who among all the gods of these nations that my fathers devoted to destruction
This phrase reflects the Assyrian king Sennacherib's arrogance and his belief in the superiority of his gods over those of the nations he conquered. Historically, the Assyrians were known for their military prowess and their practice of deporting conquered peoples, which often included the destruction of local religious sites. The phrase "devoted to destruction" echoes the biblical concept of herem, where certain things were set apart for destruction as an offering to God (see Joshua 6:17-21). This highlights the Assyrian belief that their victories were sanctioned by their deities. Theologically, this sets the stage for a confrontation between the God of Israel and the gods of the nations, reminiscent of Elijah's challenge to the prophets of Baal in 1 Kings 18.

has been able to deliver his people from my hand?
This rhetorical question underscores Sennacherib's confidence in his military conquests and the perceived impotence of other nations' gods. Historically, the Assyrians had a long record of successful campaigns, which likely contributed to Sennacherib's hubris. The phrase "from my hand" suggests a personal claim to power and control, a common theme in ancient Near Eastern royal propaganda. Biblically, this sets up a contrast with the God of Israel, who is often depicted as a deliverer of His people (see Exodus 3:8, Psalm 18:2). This question challenges the faith of the Israelites and serves as a test of their trust in God's power to save.

How then can your God deliver you from my hand?
This challenge directly questions the power and sovereignty of the God of Israel. It reflects a common ancient Near Eastern belief that the gods of a nation were only as powerful as the nation itself. Sennacherib's taunt is not just against the people of Judah but against their God, implying that He is no different from the defeated gods of other nations. This sets the stage for a divine demonstration of power, as seen in the subsequent deliverance of Jerusalem (2 Chronicles 32:21-22). Theologically, this question foreshadows the ultimate deliverance through Jesus Christ, who is seen as the fulfillment of God's promise to save His people (see Matthew 1:21, John 3:16). The challenge also echoes the temptation of Jesus in the wilderness, where His divine authority and mission were questioned (Matthew 4:1-11).

So now, do not let Hezekiah deceive you,
This phrase is part of a speech by the Assyrian king Sennacherib's officials, attempting to undermine the faith of the people of Judah in their king, Hezekiah. Historically, Hezekiah was known for his religious reforms and efforts to centralize worship in Jerusalem, which included the destruction of high places and idols. The Assyrians aimed to sow doubt about Hezekiah's leadership and his reliance on God. This tactic of psychological warfare was common in ancient Near Eastern military campaigns.

and do not let him mislead you like this.
The Assyrians accused Hezekiah of misleading his people by promising divine deliverance. This reflects a broader theme in the Bible where leaders are often challenged on their faith and trust in God. The Assyrians were trying to convince the people that Hezekiah's faith was misplaced, a common challenge faced by leaders who trust in God rather than military might.

Do not believe him,
The call to disbelief is a direct attack on the faith of the people. In the context of biblical history, this reflects the ongoing struggle between faith in God and the temptation to rely on human power and alliances. The Assyrians were known for their military prowess, and their confidence in their own strength was a test for the Israelites' faith.

for no god of any nation or kingdom has been able to deliver his people from my hand or from the hand of my fathers.
This statement highlights the Assyrian belief in their invincibility, as they had conquered many nations and their gods. It reflects the historical context of Assyrian expansion and dominance in the region. Theologically, this sets the stage for a demonstration of the power of the God of Israel, contrasting the impotence of other gods with the true God's ability to save.

How much less will your God deliver you from my hand!”
This challenge directly questions the power of the God of Israel, setting up a confrontation between the Assyrian king and the God of Hezekiah. It echoes other biblical narratives where God's power is demonstrated against seemingly insurmountable odds, such as the Exodus from Egypt. This phrase foreshadows the miraculous deliverance that God would provide, affirming His sovereignty and faithfulness to His people.

And the servants of Sennacherib spoke further against the LORD God
This phrase highlights the audacity and arrogance of Sennacherib's servants as they continue their blasphemous rhetoric. Historically, Sennacherib was the king of Assyria, a powerful empire known for its military might and expansionist policies. The Assyrians were notorious for their brutal conquests and psychological warfare, often using intimidation to weaken their enemies' resolve. In this context, the servants' speech represents a direct challenge to the sovereignty of the God of Israel, reflecting the common ancient Near Eastern belief in the superiority of one's gods over those of conquered peoples. This act of defiance against the LORD God is reminiscent of other biblical instances where pagan nations underestimated the power of the God of Israel, such as Pharaoh in Exodus. Theologically, this sets the stage for God to demonstrate His supremacy and faithfulness to His covenant people.

and against His servant Hezekiah.
Hezekiah, the king of Judah, is referred to here as God's servant, a title that underscores his role as a faithful leader who sought to follow God's commandments and reform the nation of Judah. Hezekiah's reign is noted for his religious reforms, including the removal of high places and the restoration of temple worship, as detailed earlier in 2 Chronicles. The Assyrian challenge against Hezekiah is not just a political or military confrontation but also a spiritual one, as it tests Hezekiah's faith and leadership. This phrase also connects to the broader biblical theme of God's protection and vindication of His chosen leaders, as seen in the lives of other figures like David and Moses. Hezekiah's reliance on God in the face of overwhelming odds serves as a type of Christ, prefiguring Jesus' ultimate trust in the Father amidst persecution and opposition.

He also wrote letters mocking the LORD, the God of Israel,
This phrase refers to King Sennacherib of Assyria, who sent letters to King Hezekiah and the people of Judah. The act of writing letters was a common practice in ancient Near Eastern diplomacy and warfare, often used to intimidate or demoralize opponents. Sennacherib's mockery of the LORD reflects the Assyrian belief in the superiority of their gods and military might. This is a direct challenge to the God of Israel, who is often depicted in the Bible as the one true God, superior to all other deities (Isaiah 37:10-13).

and saying against Him:
Sennacherib's words are not just against Hezekiah or Judah but are a direct affront to God Himself. This highlights the spiritual battle underlying the physical conflict. In the biblical narrative, such blasphemy is often met with divine retribution, as God defends His honor and the faith of His people (Exodus 14:14).

“Just as the gods of the nations did not deliver their people from my hand,
Sennacherib references his previous conquests, where the gods of other nations failed to protect them from Assyrian domination. This reflects the common ancient belief that military success was a sign of a god's power. However, the Bible consistently portrays the God of Israel as unique and sovereign, not limited by the failures of other deities (Psalm 96:5).

so the God of Hezekiah will not deliver His people from my hand.”
This statement is a direct challenge to the faith of Hezekiah and the people of Judah. It tests their trust in God's promises and power. Historically, Hezekiah was known for his religious reforms and faithfulness to God (2 Kings 18:5-6). The narrative sets the stage for God's miraculous intervention, as seen later in the chapter, where God delivers Judah from the Assyrian threat (2 Chronicles 32:21). This event foreshadows the ultimate deliverance through Jesus Christ, who conquers sin and death, offering salvation to all who believe (1 Corinthians 15:57).

Then the Assyrians called out loudly in Hebrew
The Assyrians, known for their military prowess and psychological warfare, strategically used the Hebrew language to communicate directly with the people of Jerusalem. This tactic was intended to bypass the leaders and speak directly to the common people, sowing fear and doubt. The use of Hebrew, the native language of the Judeans, highlights the Assyrians' intent to make their threats personal and relatable. This approach is reminiscent of other instances in the Bible where language is used to influence and manipulate, such as the serpent speaking to Eve in Genesis 3.

to the people of Jerusalem who were on the wall
The people on the wall were likely soldiers and watchmen tasked with defending the city. The walls of Jerusalem were not only physical barriers but also symbolic of God's protection over His people. The Assyrians' direct address to those on the wall signifies an attempt to undermine the city's defenses both physically and spiritually. This scene echoes the siege tactics used in other biblical accounts, such as the siege of Jericho in Joshua 6, where the walls played a crucial role in the city's defense.

to frighten and terrify them
The Assyrians aimed to instill fear and terror, a common tactic in ancient warfare designed to weaken the resolve of the defenders. Fear is a powerful weapon that can lead to demoralization and surrender without a fight. This psychological warfare is contrasted with the biblical exhortation to trust in God and not fear, as seen in passages like Isaiah 41:10, where God reassures His people of His presence and strength.

in order to capture the city
The ultimate goal of the Assyrians was the capture of Jerusalem, a significant city both politically and spiritually. Jerusalem was the center of Jewish worship and the location of the Temple, making it a prime target for conquest. The desire to capture Jerusalem can be seen as part of a larger spiritual battle, as the city represents God's covenant with His people. This mirrors the broader biblical narrative of the struggle between God's kingdom and the forces of darkness, as seen in Revelation 12, where the dragon seeks to destroy God's people.

They spoke against the God of Jerusalem
This phrase refers to the Assyrian officials, led by King Sennacherib, who blasphemed the God of Israel. Jerusalem, the city chosen by God for His temple, was under threat from the Assyrian army. The Assyrians, known for their military prowess and conquests, underestimated the God of Israel, equating Him with the powerless idols of other nations. This reflects a common ancient Near Eastern belief that gods were territorial and limited in power. The God of Jerusalem, however, is the Creator of heaven and earth, transcending geographical boundaries. This blasphemy is a direct challenge to God's sovereignty and a test of faith for the people of Judah.

as they had spoken against the gods of the peoples of the earth
The Assyrians had a history of conquering nations and their gods, which they viewed as mere idols. This phrase highlights their arrogance and ignorance in equating the God of Israel with these false gods. Historically, the Assyrians would often mock the deities of the nations they defeated, believing their own gods superior. This reflects a broader cultural context where military success was seen as a sign of divine favor. However, the God of Israel is unique, not made by human hands, and not subject to human manipulation or defeat.

the work of human hands
This phrase underscores the biblical theme of idolatry, where gods are crafted by human hands and thus powerless. In contrast, the God of Israel is the living God, not created by human hands, and sovereign over all creation. This distinction is crucial in the biblical narrative, emphasizing the futility of idol worship. The prophets often ridiculed idols as lifeless and impotent (e.g., Isaiah 44:9-20). The phrase also serves as a reminder of the first and second commandments, which prohibit the making and worshiping of idols. This sets the stage for God's deliverance of Jerusalem, demonstrating His power and faithfulness in contrast to the impotence of idols.

Jerusalem Delivered from the Assyrians

In response,
This phrase indicates a reaction to a preceding event. In the context of 2 Chronicles 32, King Hezekiah and the people of Judah are facing a significant threat from the Assyrian king Sennacherib. The Assyrian army is known for its might and brutality, and their siege of Jerusalem represents a dire situation. The response of Hezekiah and Isaiah is not one of panic or military strategy, but of turning to God, highlighting the importance of faith and reliance on divine intervention in times of crisis.

King Hezekiah
Hezekiah was the 13th king of Judah, known for his religious reforms and efforts to restore the worship of Yahweh. His reign is marked by a return to the worship of the God of Israel, tearing down high places, and reinstating the Passover. Hezekiah's leadership during the Assyrian threat is a testament to his faith and trust in God. His actions are often seen as a model of godly leadership, emphasizing the importance of seeking God's guidance in leadership roles.

and the prophet Isaiah son of Amoz
Isaiah was a major prophet in the Old Testament, whose ministry spanned the reigns of several kings, including Hezekiah. He is known for his prophecies concerning the coming of the Messiah and the salvation of the Lord. Isaiah's involvement in this event underscores the role of prophets as intermediaries between God and His people. His presence with Hezekiah signifies the importance of spiritual counsel and the power of prophetic insight during times of national crisis.

cried out to heaven in prayer,
This phrase highlights the act of prayer as a powerful response to adversity. The act of crying out to heaven signifies earnest and fervent prayer, seeking divine intervention. In the biblical narrative, prayer is often depicted as a means of accessing God's power and presence. The collaboration between a king and a prophet in prayer illustrates the unity and collective faith of the leaders of Judah. This moment is a reminder of the biblical principle that God hears and responds to the prayers of His people, as seen in other scriptures such as 2 Chronicles 7:14 and James 5:16.

and the LORD sent an angel
This phrase highlights divine intervention, a recurring theme in the Old Testament where God sends angels to execute His will. Angels are often depicted as messengers or agents of God's judgment, as seen in Exodus 12:23 during the Passover and in 2 Samuel 24:16 when an angel brings a plague upon Israel. This intervention underscores God's sovereignty and His ability to protect His people against overwhelming odds.

who annihilated every mighty man of valor and every leader and commander
The destruction of the Assyrian forces emphasizes the futility of human strength against divine power. The Assyrian army was known for its might and military prowess, often employing advanced siege tactics and psychological warfare. This event mirrors the destruction of the Egyptian army in the Red Sea (Exodus 14:28), showcasing God's ability to deliver His people from seemingly insurmountable threats.

in the camp of the king of Assyria
The Assyrian camp was likely located near Jerusalem, as the Assyrian king Sennacherib had laid siege to the city. Assyria was a dominant empire during this period, known for its brutal conquests and deportations. The defeat of their army at the hands of an angel would have been a significant blow to their reputation and power.

So he withdrew to his own land in disgrace
Sennacherib's retreat to Assyria marks a dramatic reversal of fortune. Historically, Assyrian kings recorded their victories in detail, but Sennacherib's annals notably omit this defeat, which aligns with the biblical account of his disgrace. This withdrawal fulfills the prophecy given to Hezekiah by Isaiah (Isaiah 37:7), demonstrating the reliability of God's word.

And when he entered the temple of his god
Sennacherib's return to Nineveh and his entry into the temple of Nisroch, his god, highlights the contrast between the God of Israel and the gods of the nations. The Assyrian gods were powerless to save Sennacherib, underscoring the theme of monotheism and the supremacy of Yahweh over all other deities.

some of his own sons struck him down with the sword
This act of patricide fulfills the prophecy in Isaiah 37:7 and 37:38, where it was foretold that Sennacherib would fall by the sword in his own land. The internal strife within the Assyrian royal family reflects the instability and divine judgment upon those who oppose God's people. This event also serves as a type of Christ, where betrayal and death lead to the ultimate fulfillment of God's plan, as seen in the betrayal of Jesus by Judas.

So the LORD saved Hezekiah and the people of Jerusalem
This phrase highlights God's direct intervention in the affairs of Judah. Hezekiah, the king of Judah, was known for his faithfulness to God, as seen in his reforms and efforts to restore proper worship (2 Chronicles 29-31). The deliverance from Assyria is a testament to God's faithfulness to those who trust in Him. This event is also recorded in 2 Kings 19 and Isaiah 37, where God promises to defend the city for His own sake and for the sake of David, His servant. The salvation of Jerusalem is a type of Christ's ultimate salvation of His people, emphasizing divine deliverance from overwhelming threats.

from the hands of King Sennacherib of Assyria
Sennacherib was a powerful Assyrian king known for his military campaigns and conquests. The Assyrian Empire was the dominant power in the Near East during this period, and its capital was Nineveh. Sennacherib's invasion of Judah is historically documented in Assyrian records, including the famous Taylor Prism, which corroborates the biblical account of his campaign. The phrase underscores the might of the Assyrian threat and the miraculous nature of Judah's deliverance. This event demonstrates God's sovereignty over even the most formidable earthly powers.

and all others
This phrase indicates that the threat was not only from Assyria but potentially from other surrounding nations or internal threats. It suggests a comprehensive deliverance, where God protected Judah from multiple dangers. This can be seen as a fulfillment of God's promises to protect His people when they are faithful to Him, as outlined in Deuteronomy 28. It also reflects the broader biblical theme of God as a refuge and fortress for His people (Psalm 46:1).

and He gave them rest on every side
The concept of "rest" in the Old Testament often signifies peace and security, a cessation from warfare and conflict. This rest is reminiscent of the peace that Israel experienced under King Solomon (1 Kings 4:24-25) and is a foretaste of the ultimate rest promised in the Messianic age (Hebrews 4:9-10). The phrase implies a period of stability and prosperity for Judah following the Assyrian threat, highlighting God's provision and care for His people. It also serves as a reminder of the peace that comes from trusting in God's protection and sovereignty.

Many brought offerings to Jerusalem for the LORD
This phrase highlights the response of the surrounding nations to the miraculous deliverance of Jerusalem from the Assyrian army. The offerings brought to Jerusalem signify recognition of the LORD's power and sovereignty. In the ancient Near East, it was common for nations to bring tributes to a deity or temple after witnessing a divine act. This act of bringing offerings aligns with the biblical principle of acknowledging God's intervention and blessing, as seen in other instances such as the dedication of the temple by Solomon (1 Kings 8:62-66).

and valuable gifts for Hezekiah king of Judah
Hezekiah's leadership and faith in God during the Assyrian threat earned him respect and admiration. The valuable gifts symbolize political alliances and respect for Hezekiah's role as a king who trusts in the LORD. This mirrors the gifts brought to Solomon by the Queen of Sheba (1 Kings 10:1-10), indicating a recognition of wisdom and divine favor. The gifts also reflect the cultural practice of honoring a victorious leader with treasures, a common custom in ancient diplomacy.

and from then on he was exalted in the eyes of all nations
Hezekiah's exaltation among the nations underscores the impact of God's deliverance on international relations. This phrase suggests a shift in the geopolitical landscape, where Judah, under Hezekiah's rule, becomes a focal point of admiration and respect. The exaltation of Hezekiah can be seen as a type of Christ, prefiguring the ultimate exaltation of Jesus, who is recognized by all nations as King of Kings (Philippians 2:9-11). This also fulfills the Abrahamic promise that through Israel, all nations would be blessed (Genesis 12:3).

Hezekiah’s Illness and Recovery

In those days Hezekiah became mortally ill.
Hezekiah was the king of Judah, known for his faithfulness to God and his efforts to restore proper worship in the temple. The phrase "in those days" refers to a period during his reign when he faced significant challenges, including the Assyrian threat. His illness is described as "mortal," indicating it was life-threatening. This event is also recorded in 2 Kings 20:1-11 and Isaiah 38:1-8, providing a fuller picture of the circumstances. The cultural context of the time viewed illness as a potential sign of divine displeasure, which may have added to the gravity of Hezekiah's situation.

So he prayed to the LORD,
Hezekiah's response to his illness was to turn to God in prayer, demonstrating his reliance on divine intervention. This act of prayer is consistent with his character as a king who sought the Lord's guidance and help, as seen in his previous actions against idolatry and his reforms. Prayer was a central aspect of Hebrew worship and communication with God, reflecting a deep personal relationship and trust in God's power to heal and deliver.

who spoke to him
God's response to Hezekiah's prayer was direct and personal, indicating a close relationship between the king and the divine. This communication likely came through the prophet Isaiah, as detailed in the parallel accounts. The idea of God speaking to individuals is a recurring theme in the Bible, emphasizing His willingness to engage with His people and provide guidance, comfort, and instruction.

and gave him a sign.
The sign given to Hezekiah was the miraculous turning back of the shadow on the sundial of Ahaz, as described in 2 Kings 20:8-11 and Isaiah 38:7-8. This sign served as a confirmation of God's promise to heal Hezekiah and extend his life by fifteen years. Signs and wonders in the Bible often serve to authenticate God's message and His messengers, reinforcing faith and trust in His promises. This event also prefigures the miraculous signs associated with Jesus Christ, who performed miracles to validate His divine authority and mission.

But because his heart was proud
Hezekiah's pride is a significant theme in this passage. After experiencing God's miraculous deliverance from the Assyrian army and healing from a terminal illness, Hezekiah's heart became lifted up. Pride is often highlighted in Scripture as a precursor to downfall (Proverbs 16:18). This pride can be seen as a failure to acknowledge God's sovereignty and grace, a common human failing that leads to spiritual and sometimes physical consequences.

Hezekiah did not repay the favor shown to him
Hezekiah's failure to respond appropriately to God's mercy and blessings is a critical point. The "favor" refers to God's deliverance and healing, which should have led to gratitude and humility. Instead, Hezekiah's actions suggest ingratitude. This mirrors the biblical principle that to whom much is given, much is required (Luke 12:48). The expectation is that blessings from God should lead to a life of obedience and thankfulness.

Therefore wrath came upon him and upon Judah and Jerusalem
The consequence of Hezekiah's pride was divine wrath, not only affecting him but also extending to the nation of Judah and its capital, Jerusalem. This reflects the biblical concept of corporate responsibility, where the leader's actions impact the entire community. The wrath mentioned here can be understood as God's righteous judgment, which is a recurring theme in the Old Testament. It serves as a warning that sin, especially pride, can have far-reaching effects. This also foreshadows the eventual Babylonian exile, a result of continued disobedience and pride among the leaders and people of Judah.

Then Hezekiah humbled the pride of his heart—
Hezekiah, the king of Judah, is noted for his faithfulness to God, but like many leaders, he struggled with pride. This phrase highlights a pivotal moment where Hezekiah recognizes his arrogance and chooses humility. The act of humbling oneself is a recurring theme in Scripture, often associated with repentance and seeking God's favor (James 4:10). Hezekiah's humility is significant because it contrasts with his earlier pride, which is mentioned in 2 Chronicles 32:25, where he did not respond appropriately to God's kindness. This act of humbling is a turning point, showing a return to dependence on God.

he and the people of Jerusalem—
The inclusion of the people of Jerusalem indicates a communal repentance. In the ancient Near Eastern context, a king's actions often set the tone for the nation. Hezekiah's leadership in humbling himself likely inspired the people to follow suit. This collective humility is reminiscent of other biblical instances where communal repentance leads to divine mercy, such as in the story of Jonah and Nineveh (Jonah 3:5-10). It underscores the importance of both individual and corporate repentance in seeking God's forgiveness.

so that the wrath of the LORD did not come upon them—
The wrath of the LORD refers to divine judgment, which in the Old Testament often manifested as military defeat, famine, or other calamities. Hezekiah's humility averts this judgment, demonstrating the biblical principle that God is merciful to those who repent (2 Chronicles 7:14). This phrase also reflects the covenant relationship between God and Israel, where obedience brings blessing and disobedience brings judgment (Deuteronomy 28). The avoidance of God's wrath here is a testament to His willingness to forgive and restore those who turn back to Him.

during the days of Hezekiah.
This temporal clause indicates that the reprieve from God's wrath was specific to Hezekiah's reign. It suggests that Hezekiah's leadership and the people's repentance had a lasting impact during his lifetime. However, it also implies that future generations would need to continue in faithfulness to maintain God's favor. This is a common theme in the history of Israel and Judah, where the faithfulness of one generation does not automatically ensure the same for the next (Judges 2:10). The phrase serves as a reminder of the ongoing need for each generation to seek God earnestly.

Hezekiah had very great riches and honor
Hezekiah, the king of Judah, was known for his faithfulness to God, which led to divine favor and prosperity. His wealth and honor were a testament to God's blessing, as seen in 2 Kings 18:7, where it states that the Lord was with him, and he prospered wherever he went. This prosperity can be seen as a fulfillment of the covenant blessings promised to Israel for obedience (Deuteronomy 28:1-14). Hezekiah's wealth also reflects the political stability and economic growth during his reign, following the Assyrian threat's retreat.

and he made treasuries for his silver, gold, precious stones, spices, shields, and all kinds of valuable articles
The construction of treasuries indicates a period of peace and security, allowing Hezekiah to focus on accumulating and safeguarding wealth. The mention of silver, gold, and precious stones highlights the economic prosperity and trade relations of Judah during this time. Spices were highly valued in the ancient Near East, often used in religious rituals and as luxury items, indicating Judah's involvement in long-distance trade. Shields, while practical for defense, also symbolized strength and military preparedness. The accumulation of "all kinds of valuable articles" suggests a kingdom flourishing under God's favor, reminiscent of Solomon's wealth (1 Kings 10:14-29). This prosperity can be seen as a type of the future messianic kingdom, where peace and abundance will reign.

He also made storehouses for the harvest of grain and new wine and oil
This phrase highlights the importance of preparation and stewardship in ancient Israel. Storehouses were essential for preserving the harvest, ensuring food security during times of scarcity. Grain, new wine, and oil were staples in the diet and economy of Israel, symbolizing sustenance, joy, and anointing, respectively. The construction of storehouses reflects a period of prosperity and foresight under King Hezekiah's reign. Biblically, this mirrors Joseph's actions in Egypt (Genesis 41:48-49), where he stored grain during years of plenty to prepare for famine. Spiritually, it can be seen as a call to store up spiritual treasures (Matthew 6:19-21).

stalls for all kinds of livestock
Livestock was a sign of wealth and blessing in the ancient Near East. The mention of stalls indicates organized and systematic care for animals, which were vital for agriculture, transportation, and religious sacrifices. This reflects Hezekiah's commitment to maintaining and expanding the kingdom's resources. The care for livestock is reminiscent of the patriarchs, such as Abraham and Job, who were also blessed with abundant flocks and herds (Genesis 13:2, Job 1:3). It underscores the biblical principle of responsible stewardship over God's creation (Proverbs 27:23).

and pens for the flocks
Flocks, particularly sheep and goats, were central to the agrarian lifestyle of ancient Israel. Pens provided protection from predators and harsh weather, ensuring the well-being of the animals. This phrase suggests a well-organized and prosperous kingdom under Hezekiah's leadership. The imagery of shepherding is prevalent throughout Scripture, often used to describe God's care for His people (Psalm 23, John 10:11). It also foreshadows Christ as the Good Shepherd, who tends to His flock with diligence and love. The preparation of pens signifies the importance of safeguarding and nurturing what has been entrusted to one's care.

He made cities for himself
This phrase highlights the administrative and strategic prowess of King Hezekiah. Building cities was a common practice for kings to fortify their kingdoms and ensure economic stability. In the context of ancient Judah, cities served as centers of trade, military defense, and governance. Hezekiah's efforts in city-building reflect his commitment to strengthening his kingdom against potential threats, such as the Assyrian empire. This action also mirrors the practices of other biblical figures like Solomon, who built cities to consolidate his reign (1 Kings 9:17-19).

and he acquired herds of sheep and cattle in abundance
The acquisition of livestock signifies wealth and prosperity in the agrarian society of ancient Israel. Herds of sheep and cattle were essential for food, clothing, and religious sacrifices. This abundance indicates a period of economic growth and stability under Hezekiah's rule. The mention of livestock also connects to the patriarchs, such as Abraham and Jacob, who were blessed with large flocks as a sign of God's favor (Genesis 13:2, Genesis 30:43).

for God gave him very great wealth
This phrase attributes Hezekiah's prosperity directly to divine blessing, emphasizing the biblical theme that true success and wealth come from God. It reflects the covenantal relationship between God and the kings of Judah, where obedience to God's commandments often resulted in material blessings (Deuteronomy 28:1-14). Hezekiah's wealth can be seen as a fulfillment of God's promises to bless those who follow Him. This divine favor also prefigures the ultimate blessing found in Jesus Christ, who offers spiritual riches to believers (Ephesians 1:3).

It was Hezekiah who blocked the upper outlet of the Spring of Gihon
Hezekiah, the king of Judah, is noted for his significant engineering achievements, particularly in water management. The Spring of Gihon was a crucial water source for Jerusalem, located in the Kidron Valley. By blocking the upper outlet, Hezekiah aimed to secure the city's water supply against the Assyrian siege led by Sennacherib. This action reflects Hezekiah's wisdom and foresight in protecting his people. The Gihon Spring is also historically significant as the site where Solomon was anointed king (1 Kings 1:33-45), symbolizing a place of divine blessing and provision.

and channeled it down to the west side of the City of David.
Hezekiah's construction of a tunnel to redirect the waters of the Gihon Spring to the west side of the City of David is a remarkable feat of ancient engineering. This tunnel, known as Hezekiah's Tunnel, is approximately 1,750 feet long and was carved through solid rock. It ensured a continuous water supply within the city walls, crucial during times of siege. Archaeological discoveries, including the Siloam Inscription, confirm the historical accuracy of this biblical account. The City of David, the original nucleus of Jerusalem, holds deep historical and spiritual significance as the site of King David's reign and the location of the Ark of the Covenant.

And Hezekiah prospered in all that he did.
Hezekiah's prosperity is attributed to his faithfulness to God and his reforms to restore proper worship in Judah. His reign is marked by a return to the worship of Yahweh, the removal of idolatrous practices, and the celebration of the Passover (2 Chronicles 30). The prosperity he experienced is seen as a divine blessing for his obedience and trust in God. This phrase echoes the biblical principle that those who follow God's commandments and seek His guidance will find success and favor (Joshua 1:8, Psalm 1:3). Hezekiah's life serves as a type of Christ, exemplifying a righteous king who leads his people in faithfulness to God, prefiguring the ultimate reign of Jesus as the King of Kings.

And so when ambassadors of the rulers of Babylon were sent to him
This phrase indicates a diplomatic mission from Babylon to Judah. Babylon, at this time, was a rising power, and its interest in Judah suggests the growing influence of King Hezekiah. The visit likely occurred after Hezekiah's miraculous recovery from illness and the defeat of the Assyrians, events that would have drawn international attention. The Babylonian envoys were likely sent by Merodach-Baladan, a king known for his opposition to Assyrian dominance, seeking alliances. This visit is also recorded in 2 Kings 20:12-19 and Isaiah 39, highlighting its significance.

to inquire about the wonder that had happened in the land
The "wonder" refers to the miraculous events surrounding Hezekiah's reign, particularly his healing and the defeat of the Assyrian army. The "wonder" could also include the sign of the sun moving backward, as mentioned in 2 Kings 20:8-11. Such events would have been of great interest to foreign powers, both for their political implications and their demonstration of divine favor. This inquiry reflects the ancient world's fascination with omens and signs, often seen as indicators of divine will.

God left him alone to test him
This phrase suggests a divine purpose behind the events, where God allows Hezekiah to act independently to reveal his true character. The concept of God "testing" individuals is a recurring theme in Scripture, seen in the lives of figures like Abraham (Genesis 22) and Job. It implies a period of trial where one's faith and reliance on God are examined. Theologically, it underscores the belief in God's sovereignty and His interest in the moral and spiritual development of His people.

that He might know all that was in Hezekiah’s heart
This phrase emphasizes the importance of inner motives and the condition of the heart in biblical theology. While God is omniscient, the testing serves to reveal Hezekiah's heart to himself and others. Hezekiah's subsequent actions, showing the Babylonian envoys all his treasures (2 Kings 20:13), reveal a lapse in judgment and pride, leading to Isaiah's prophecy of Babylonian captivity. This serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of pride and the importance of humility and reliance on God.

Hezekiah’s Death

As for the rest of the acts of Hezekiah and his deeds of loving devotion
Hezekiah was one of the most notable kings of Judah, known for his religious reforms and dedication to God. His reign is marked by efforts to restore proper worship in the temple, destroy idolatry, and lead the nation back to the covenant with Yahweh. His deeds of loving devotion include his trust in God during the Assyrian siege and his efforts to celebrate the Passover, inviting even the northern tribes to join. This phrase highlights the comprehensive nature of his piety and leadership, which extended beyond mere political achievements to include spiritual and religious devotion.

they are indeed written in the vision of the prophet Isaiah son of Amoz
Isaiah, a major prophet in the Hebrew Bible, played a significant role during Hezekiah's reign. His writings provide insight into the spiritual and political climate of the time. The "vision" refers to the prophetic revelations and messages Isaiah received from God, which include both warnings and promises. Isaiah's interactions with Hezekiah, such as the prophecy of deliverance from the Assyrians and the sign of the sun's shadow, are documented in the Book of Isaiah, providing a prophetic perspective on Hezekiah's reign.

in the Book of the Kings of Judah and Israel
This phrase refers to the historical records that chronicled the reigns of the kings of both the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah. These records, which are now part of the biblical books of 1 and 2 Kings, provide a historical account of the monarchies, including political events, religious reforms, and interactions with prophets. The inclusion of Hezekiah's acts in these records underscores their significance and the impact of his reign on the history of God's people.

And Hezekiah rested with his fathers
This phrase indicates the death of King Hezekiah, a common biblical expression meaning he died and joined his ancestors in death. Hezekiah was a king of Judah known for his faithfulness to God, his religious reforms, and his efforts to centralize worship in Jerusalem. His reign is detailed in 2 Kings 18-20 and 2 Chronicles 29-32. The phrase "rested with his fathers" suggests a peaceful death, often used for kings who were considered righteous.

and was buried in the upper tombs of David’s descendants.
Hezekiah's burial in the "upper tombs" signifies a place of honor among the royal burial sites, likely located in the City of David, Jerusalem. This burial location underscores his esteemed status among the kings of Judah. Archaeological evidence of royal tombs in this area supports the historical accuracy of such burials. The mention of "David’s descendants" connects Hezekiah to the Davidic line, emphasizing the messianic promise that the Messiah would come from David's lineage.

All Judah and the people of Jerusalem paid him honor at his death.
The collective mourning and honor paid by "all Judah and the people of Jerusalem" reflect Hezekiah's popularity and the impact of his leadership. His reforms, which included the restoration of temple worship and the celebration of Passover, endeared him to the people. This public mourning is reminiscent of the honor given to other righteous leaders in Israel's history, such as Samuel (1 Samuel 25:1) and Josiah (2 Chronicles 35:24).

And his son Manasseh reigned in his place.
Manasseh's succession marks a significant transition in Judah's history. Unlike his father, Manasseh initially led the nation into idolatry and evil practices, as detailed in 2 Kings 21 and 2 Chronicles 33. His reign is often seen as a period of spiritual decline, contrasting sharply with Hezekiah's reforms. However, Manasseh's later repentance and return to God highlight themes of redemption and forgiveness. This transition also serves as a reminder of the cyclical nature of Israel's faithfulness and apostasy throughout the Old Testament narrative.

This is a draft of the Berean Study Bible. Please send all comments and recommendations to bereanstudybible@aol.com.



Bible Hub


2 Chronicles 31
Top of Page
Top of Page